Probabilistic Field Coverage using a Hybrid Network of Static and Mobile Sensors

Providing field coverage is a key issue in many sensor network applications. For a field with unevenly distributed static sensors, a quality coverage with acceptable network lifetime is often difficult to achieve. We propose a hybrid network that consists of both static and mobile sensors, and we suggest that it can be a cost-effective solution for held coverage. The main challenges of designing such a hybrid network are, first, determining necessary coverage contributions from each type of sensors; and second, scheduling the sensors to achieve the desired coverage contributions, which includes activation scheduling for static sensors and movement scheduling for mobile sensors. In this paper, we offer an analytical study on the above problems, and the results also lead to a practical system design. Specifically, we present an optimal algorithm for calculating the contributions from different types of sensors, which fully exploits the potentials of the mobile sensors and maximizes the network lifetime. We then present a random walk model for the mobile sensors. The model is distributed with very low control overhead. Its parameters can be fine-tuned to match the moving capability of different mobile sensors and the demands from a broad spectrum of applications. A node collaboration scheme is then introduced to further enhance the system performance. We demonstrate through analysis and simulation that, in our hybrid design, a small set of mobile sensors can effectively address the uneven distribution of the static sensors and significantly improve the coverage quality.

[1]  Krishnendu Chakrabarty,et al.  Sensor deployment and target localization based on virtual forces , 2003, IEEE INFOCOM 2003. Twenty-second Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37428).

[2]  L.J. Guibas,et al.  Geometric spanners for routing in mobile networks , 2001, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[3]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Robomote: a tiny mobile robot platform for large-scale ad-hoc sensor networks , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[4]  Donald F. Towsley,et al.  Mobility improves coverage of sensor networks , 2005, MobiHoc '05.

[5]  Tian He,et al.  Differentiated surveillance for sensor networks , 2003, SenSys '03.

[6]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  Sensor Networks , 2002, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[7]  Miodrag Potkonjak,et al.  Power efficient organization of wireless sensor networks , 2001, ICC 2001. IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37240).

[8]  Christian Schindelhauer,et al.  Mobility in Wireless Networks , 2006, SOFSEM.

[9]  Lixia Zhang,et al.  Recursive position estimation in sensor networks , 2001, Proceedings Ninth International Conference on Network Protocols. ICNP 2001.

[10]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  GPS-less low-cost outdoor localization for very small devices , 2000, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[11]  Francesco Mondada,et al.  Mobile Robot Miniaturisation: A Tool for Investigation in Control Algorithms , 1993, ISER.

[12]  Thomas F. La Porta,et al.  Bidding Protocols for Deploying Mobile Sensors , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[13]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Geography-informed energy conservation for Ad Hoc routing , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[14]  J.A. O'Sullivan,et al.  Co-Grid: an efficient coverage maintenance protocol for distributed sensor networks , 2004, Third International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2004. IPSN 2004.

[15]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Intelligent fluid infrastructure for embedded networks , 2004, MobiSys '04.

[16]  Alhussein A. Abouzeid,et al.  Stochastic Event Capture Using Mobile Sensors Subject to a Quality Metric , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[17]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  An Incremental Self-Deployment Algorithm for Mobile Sensor Networks , 2002, Auton. Robots.

[18]  Leandros Tassiulas,et al.  Energy conserving routing in wireless ad-hoc networks , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[19]  Ossama Younis,et al.  Distributed clustering in ad-hoc sensor networks: a hybrid, energy-efficient approach , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[20]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  Mobile Sensor Network Deployment using Potential Fields : A Distributed , Scalable Solution to the Area Coverage Problem , 2002 .

[21]  Sheldon M. Ross Introduction to Probability Models. , 1995 .

[22]  Prasant Mohapatra,et al.  Power conservation and quality of surveillance in target tracking sensor networks , 2004, MobiCom '04.

[23]  H. M. Taylor,et al.  An introduction to stochastic modeling , 1985 .

[24]  Thomas F. La Porta,et al.  A bidding protocol for deploying mobile sensors , 2003, 11th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols, 2003. Proceedings..