Social targets improve body-based and environment-based strategies during spatial navigation

Encoding the position of another person in space is vital for everyday life. Nevertheless, little is known about the specific navigational strategies associated with encoding the position of another person in the wider spatial environment. We asked two groups of participants to learn the location of a target (person or object) during active navigation, while optic flow information, a landmark, or both optic flow information and a landmark were available in a virtual environment. Whereas optic flow information is used for body-based encoding, such as the simulation of motor movements, landmarks are used to form an abstract, disembodied representation of the environment. During testing, we passively moved participants through virtual space, and compared their abilities to correctly decide whether the non-visible target was before or behind them. Using psychometric functions and the Bayes Theorem, we show that both groups assigned similar weights to body-based and environment-based cues in the condition, where both cue types were available. However, the group who was provided with a person as target showed generally reduced position errors compared to the group who was provided with an object as target. We replicated this effect in a second study with novel participants. This indicates a social advantage in spatial encoding, with facilitated processing of both body-based and environment-based cues during spatial navigation when the position of a person is encoded. This may underlie our critical ability to make accurate distance judgments during social interactions, for example, during fight or flight responses.

[1]  Ekaterina Levichkina,et al.  Coding of spatial attention priorities and object features in the macaque lateral intraparietal cortex , 2017, Physiological reports.

[2]  D. Blanchard,et al.  Human defensive behaviors to threat scenarios show parallels to fear- and anxiety-related defense patterns of non-human mammals , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[3]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  Visuo-tactile Integration in Personal Space , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  David H. Foster,et al.  Model-free estimation of the psychometric function , 2010 .

[5]  F. Binkofski,et al.  The mirror neuron system and action recognition , 2004, Brain and Language.

[6]  Kenneth H. Britten,et al.  Mechanisms of self-motion perception. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  B. Schönebeck,et al.  The neural basis of ego- and allocentric reference frames in spatial navigation: Evidence from spatio-temporal coupled current density reconstruction , 2006, Brain Research.

[8]  Gillian Forrester,et al.  Social environment elicits lateralized navigational paths in two populations of typically developing children , 2014, Brain and Cognition.

[9]  H. Heinze,et al.  Reward-related fMRI activation of dopaminergic midbrain is associated with enhanced hippocampus-dependent long-term memory formation , 2005 .

[10]  Hermann J Müller,et al.  Evidence of separable spatial representations in a virtual navigation task. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  D. Kumaran,et al.  Context-specific activation of hippocampus and SN/VTA by reward is related to enhanced long-term memory for embedded objects , 2016, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[12]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Attentional capture by social stimuli in young infants , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[13]  Michael J. Proulx,et al.  The role of visual experience for the neural basis of spatial cognition , 2012, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[14]  Giacomo Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system and action recognition , 2003 .

[15]  R. Schultz,et al.  Neural evidence for an association between social proficiency and sensitivity to social reward. , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[16]  C. Barnes,et al.  The Aging Navigational System , 2017, Neuron.

[17]  Karsten Mueller,et al.  Judging roughness by sight—A 7‐tesla fMRI study on responsivity of the primary somatosensory cortex during observed touch of self and others , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[18]  Nikolai W F Bode,et al.  Distinguishing Social from Nonsocial Navigation in Moving Animal Groups , 2012, The American Naturalist.

[19]  W. Prinz,et al.  Compatibility between Observed and Executed Finger Movements: Comparing Symbolic, Spatial, and Imitative Cues , 2000, Brain and Cognition.

[20]  Eleanor A. Maguire,et al.  Retrosplenial Cortex Codes for Permanent Landmarks , 2012, PloS one.

[21]  Michael J. Proulx,et al.  Where am I? Who am I? The Relation Between Spatial Cognition, Social Cognition and Individual Differences in the Built Environment , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[22]  E. Buffalo,et al.  Social relevance drives viewing behavior independent of low-level salience in rhesus macaques , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[23]  Giuseppe Iaria,et al.  Gray Matter Differences Correlate with Spontaneous Strategies in a Human Virtual Navigation Task , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  N. Córdova,et al.  Attentional modulation of background connectivity between ventral visual cortex and the medial temporal lobe , 2016, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[25]  W. Prinz,et al.  Perceptual resonance: action-induced modulation of perception , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Grace Truong,et al.  SOAP Opera: Self as Object and Agent in Prioritizing Attention* , 2017, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Andrea Serino,et al.  Variability in Multisensory Responses Predicts the Self-Space , 2016, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  T. Hafting,et al.  Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex , 2005, Nature.

[29]  Bettina Forster,et al.  An ERP Investigation on Visuotactile Interactions in Peripersonal and Extrapersonal Space: Evidence for the Spatial Rule , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  Jack A. De Havas,et al.  On the bimanual integration of proprioceptive information , 2015, Experimental Brain Research.

[31]  Ryuta Kawashima,et al.  Neural mechanisms underlying the reward‐related enhancement of motivation when remembering episodic memories with high difficulty , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[32]  M. Shapiro,et al.  A Map for Social Navigation in the Human Brain , 2015, Neuron.

[33]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  What determines our navigational abilities? , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  Karsten Mueller,et al.  The functional architecture of S1 during touch observation described with 7 T fMRI , 2013, Brain Structure and Function.

[35]  Matthew D. Weaver,et al.  Attentional capture and hold: the oculomotor correlates of the change detection advantage for faces , 2011, Psychological research.

[36]  Martin V. Butz,et al.  The Influence of Human Body Orientation on Distance Judgments , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[37]  Taketoshi Ono,et al.  Place recognition responses of neurons in monkey hippocampus , 1991, Neuroscience Letters.

[38]  M. Proulx,et al.  Visual experience facilitates allocentric spatial representation , 2013, Behavioural Brain Research.

[39]  Olaf Blanke,et al.  Common and distinct brain regions processing multisensory bodily signals for peripersonal space and body ownership , 2017, NeuroImage.

[40]  C. Keysers,et al.  The Observation and Execution of Actions Share Motor and Somatosensory Voxels in all Tested Subjects: Single-Subject Analyses of Unsmoothed fMRI Data , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  P. Haggard,et al.  Noninformative vision improves the spatial resolution of touch in humans , 2001, Current Biology.

[42]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[43]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain , 2010, NeuroImage.

[44]  D. Vorberg,et al.  Estimating the difference limen in 2AFC tasks: Pitfalls and improved estimators , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[45]  Jonathan W. Kelly,et al.  Cue combination in human spatial navigation , 2017, Cognitive Psychology.

[46]  J. Rieser,et al.  Bayesian integration of spatial information. , 2007, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  P. Haggard,et al.  The perceived position of the hand in space , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[48]  Miguel A. García-Pérez,et al.  Adaptive psychophysical methods for nonmonotonic psychometric functions , 2014, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[49]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Grounded Cognition: Past, Present, and Future , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[50]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Prospective coding in event representation , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[51]  Lysanne S. Post,et al.  Mechanisms of embodiment , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[52]  Pete R. Jones,et al.  Development of Cue Integration in Human Navigation , 2008, Current Biology.

[53]  R. Dolan,et al.  Sharing a Context with Other Rewarding Events Increases the Probability that Neutral Events will be Recollected , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[54]  N. Burgess Spatial Cognition and the Brain , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.