Evolution of mutualism between globeflowers and their pollinating flies.

Plant/seed-eater pollinators mutualisms involve a plant pollinated by an insect whose larvae develop by eating a fraction of host-plant seeds. The outcome of the interaction therefore depends on the number of ovules fertilized by adult visits and the number of seeds destroyed by larvae. Among the very few cases of such mutualisms reported so far is the globeflower-globeflower flies mutualism, which is unique in that it involves several congeneric fly species (Chiastocheta genus) coexisting within a single host-plant species, Trollius europaeus. These species exhibit contrasted oviposition behaviors resulting in a more or less beneficial outcome for the plant. We designed an adaptive dynamics model to investigate how morphological traits of globeflower could affect the evolution of oviposition in its pollinating flies. Three fly traits (flower age at oviposition, clutch size and the level of avoidance of already parasitized flowers) and one plant trait (closed or open corolla) were examined. Whatever the shape of the flower, evolutionary branching occurs between early and late ovipositing flies, driven by strong competition among larvae within a fruit. Once this branching occurred, the closed shape of the corolla is likely to offer a better protection to eggs of early but not of late ovipositing flies. The difference in egg survival results in higher competition among early larvae and thus selects for decreased clutch size in early flies. This can be seen as a first step in the evolution of a mutualistic behavior. The prediction of our model fits field observations of fly behavior, giving theoretical support to the hypothesis of fly sympatric speciation within its host plant. Moreover, flower closed globe shape can be positively selected in globeflowers as it results in a reduction of parasitism strength. This last evolution therefore leads to a stable mutualism between globeflowers and globeflower flies.

[1]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[2]  J. Bull,et al.  Distinguishing mechanisms for the evolution of co-operation. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  R. Nisbet,et al.  How should we define 'fitness' for general ecological scenarios? , 1992, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  O. Pellmyr The phylogeny of a mutualism: evolution and coadaptation between Trollius and its seed-parasitic pollinators , 1992 .

[5]  O. Pellmyr,et al.  Evolutionary stability of mutualism between yuccas and yucca moths , 1994, Nature.

[6]  Visual trapping of the Strobilomyia spp. (Dipt., Anthomyiidae) flies damaging Siberian larch cones in north‐eastern China , 1995 .

[7]  J. Thompson,et al.  Evolution of Pollination and Mutualism in the Yucca Moth Lineage , 1996, American Naturalist.

[8]  V. Loeschcke,et al.  Distribution, Abundance and Oviposition Patterns of Four Coexisting Chiastocheta Species (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) , 1996 .

[9]  O. Pellmyr POLLINATING SEED EATERS: WHY IS ACTIVE POLLINATION SO RARE? , 1997 .

[10]  U Dieckmann,et al.  Can adaptive dynamics invade? , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  M. Anstett,et al.  Figs and fig pollinators: evolutionary conflicts in a coevoled mutualism. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[12]  L. Després,et al.  Obligate mutualism between Trollius europaeus and its seed-parasite pollinators Chiastocheta flies in the Alps , 1998 .

[13]  Theodore H. Fleming,et al.  MUTUALISTIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN UPIGA VIRESCENS (PYRALIDAE), A POLLINATING SEED-CONSUMER, AND LOPHOCEREUS SCHOTTII (CACTACEAE) , 1999 .

[14]  Jaeger,et al.  Evolution of oviposition strategies and speciation in the globeflower flies Chiastocheta spp. (Anthomyiidae) , 1999 .

[15]  U. Dieckmann,et al.  On the origin of species by sympatric speciation , 1999, Nature.

[16]  L. Després,et al.  Oviposition by mutualistic seed-parasitic pollinators and its effects on annual fitness of single- and multi-flowered host plants , 1999, Oecologia.

[17]  O. Pellmyr,et al.  POLLEN-MEDIATED SELECTIVE ABORTION IN YUCCAS AND ITS CONSEQUENCES FOR THE PLANT–POLLINATOR MUTUALISM , 2000 .

[18]  L. Després,et al.  Evolutionary conflict between Trollius europaeus and its seed-parasite pollinators Chiastocheta flies , 2000 .

[19]  J. Leebens-Mack,et al.  Reversal of Mutualism as a Mechanism for Adaptive Radiation in Yucca Moths , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[20]  R. Law,et al.  On mutualists and exploiters: plant-insect coevolution in pollinating seed-parasite systems. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[21]  F. Pompanon,et al.  Variation in predation costs with Chiastocheta egg number on Trollius europaeus: how many seeds to pay for pollination? , 2001 .

[22]  F. Pompanon,et al.  Speciation in the globeflower fly Chiastocheta spp. (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) in relation to host plant species, biogeography, and morphology. , 2002, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[23]  O. Pellmyr The cost of mutualism: interactions between Trollius europaeus and its pollinating parasites , 2004, Oecologia.