Laminar differences in plasticity in area 17 following retinal lesions in kittens or adult cats

Circumscribed retinal lesions in adult cats result in a reorganization of circuitry in area 17 such that neurons in the lesion projection zone (LPZ) can now be activated, not from their original receptive fields (RFs) but from regions of normal retina adjacent to the lesion (‘ectopic’ RFs). We have studied this phenomenon further by making circumscribed monocular retinal lesions in 8‐week‐old kittens and recording responses to visual stimuli of neurons in the LPZ of area 17 when these cats reached adulthood. These responses have been compared with those in adult‐lesioned cats either of relatively short postlesion survival (2–24 weeks) or long postlesion survival (3.5–4.5 years). In both kitten‐lesioned and adult‐lesioned animals most LPZ neurons recorded from the supragranular layers (II and III) not only exhibited new ectopic RFs when stimuli were presented via the lesioned eye but the RF properties (e.g. the sizes of excitatory RFs, orientation and direction selectivities, velocity preferences and upper cut‐off velocities) were often indistinguishable from those seen when stimuli were presented via the nonlesioned eye. Similarly, in both kitten‐lesioned and adult‐lesioned animals, most LPZ neurons recorded from the granular and infragranular layers (IV, V, VI), like those recorded from the supragranular layers, were binocular. However, in adult‐lesioned but not in kitten‐lesioned animals, the responses and the upper cut‐off velocities of LPZ cells recorded from the granular and infragranular layers to stimuli presented via ectopic RFs tended to be, respectively, substantially weaker and lower than those for stimuli presented via the nonlesioned eye. The age‐related laminar differences in reorganizational plasticity of cat striate cortex correlate with the lamino‐temporal pattern of distribution of N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate glutamate receptors in striate cortex.

[1]  M G Rosa,et al.  Monocular focal retinal lesions induce short–term topographic plasticity in adult cat visual cortex , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Y. Chino Adult plasticity in the visual system. , 1995, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[3]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  W. Burke,et al.  Plasticity in adult cat visual cortex (area 17) following circumscribed monocular lesions of all retinal layers , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  C. Gilbert Adult cortical dynamics. , 1998, Physiological reviews.

[6]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Receptive field expansion in adult visual cortex is linked to dynamic changes in strength of cortical connections. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  W. Singer,et al.  Functional amblyopia in kittens with unilateral exotropia , 1980, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  M. Rosa,et al.  Visuotopic reorganization in the primary visual cortex of adult cats following monocular and binocular retinal lesions. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[10]  G. Orban,et al.  Laminar distribution of NMDA receptors in cat and monkey visual cortex visualized by [3H]‐MK‐801 binding , 1993, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  Andrew B. Metha,et al.  Topographic Plasticity in Primary Visual Cortex Is Mediated by Local Corticocortical Connections , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[13]  Earl L. Smith,et al.  Topographic map reorganization in cat area 17 after early monocular retinal lesions , 2002, Visual Neuroscience.

[14]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Axonal sprouting accompanies functional reorganization in adult cat striate cortex , 1994, Nature.

[15]  Earl L. Smith,et al.  Recovery of binocular responses by cortical neurons after early monocular lesions , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  K. Albus,et al.  The Topography of Tangential Inhibitory Connections in the Postnatally Developing and Mature Striate Cortex of the Cat , 1994, The European journal of neuroscience.

[17]  C. Gilbert Laminar differences in receptive field properties of cells in cat primary visual cortex , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  V. Bringuier,et al.  Horizontal propagation of visual activity in the synaptic integration field of area 17 neurons. , 1999, Science.

[19]  B. Gordon,et al.  Laminar distribution of MK‐801, kainate, AMPA, and muscimol binding sites in cat visual cortex: A developmental study , 1996, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[20]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Some quantitative aspects of the cat's eye: axis and plane of reference, visual field co‐ordinates and optics , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  W Singer,et al.  The development of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors in cat visual cortex. , 1989, Brain research. Developmental brain research.

[22]  T. Tsumoto,et al.  Actions of excitatory amino acid antagonists on synaptic potentials of layer II/III neurons of the cat's visual cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  M G Rosa,et al.  Retinal detachment induces massive immediate reorganization in visual cortex. , 1995, Neuroreport.

[24]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Improved use of tapetal reflection for eye-position monitoring. , 1979, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  W. Burke,et al.  Effects of selective pressure block of Y-type optic nerve fibers on the receptive-field properties of neurons in the striate cortex of the cat , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[26]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Receptive field dynamics in adult primary visual cortex , 1992, Nature.

[27]  J. Rauschecker,et al.  Mechanisms of visual plasticity: Hebb synapses, NMDA receptors, and beyond. , 1991, Physiological reviews.

[28]  N. Daw,et al.  The location and function of NMDA receptors in cat and kitten visual cortex , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[29]  T. Kasamatsu,et al.  Roles of N-methyl-d-aspartate receptors in ocular dominance plasticity in developing visual cortex: re-evaluation , 1997, Neuroscience.

[30]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  U. Eysel,et al.  Functional reconnections without new axonal growth in a partially denervated visual relay nucleus , 1982, Nature.

[32]  J. Kaas,et al.  Reorganization of retinotopic cortical maps in adult mammals after lesions of the retina. , 1990, Science.

[33]  Nigel W. Daw,et al.  Mechanisms of Plasticity in the Visual Cortex , 1995 .

[34]  T. Wiesel Postnatal development of the visual cortex and the influence of environment , 1982, Nature.

[35]  T. Bonhoeffer,et al.  Functional topography of horizontal neuronal networks in cat visual cortex (area 18) , 1996 .

[36]  U. Eysel,et al.  The effects of partial retinal lesions on activity and size of cells in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[37]  B. Dreher,et al.  Geniculate input to cat visual cortex: a comparison of area 19 with areas 17 and 18. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  A. A. Skavenski,et al.  Recovery of visual responses in foveal V1 neurons following bilateral foveal lesions in adult monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[39]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Interocular transfer of receptive field expansion in cat visual cortex , 1995, Vision Research.

[40]  U. Eysel,et al.  Recovery of function is not associated with proliferation of retinogeniculate synapses after chronic deafferentation in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the adult cat , 1984, Neuroscience Letters.

[41]  N W Daw,et al.  Mechanisms of plasticity in the visual cortex. The Friedenwald Lecture. , 1994, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[42]  J. Kaas,et al.  Rapid reorganization of cortical maps in adult cats following restricted deafferentation in retina , 1992, Vision Research.

[43]  L. Palmer,et al.  The retinotopic organization of area 17 (striate cortex) in the cat , 1978, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[44]  M. Pettet,et al.  Dynamic changes in receptive-field size in cat primary visual cortex. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  W. Burke,et al.  Modulatory influence of feedback projections from area 21a on neuronal activities in striate cortex of the cat. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[46]  Y. Chino Receptive-Field Plasticity in the Adult Visual Cortex: Dynamic Signal Rerouting or Experience-Dependent Plasticity , 1997 .

[47]  D. Hubel,et al.  Binocular interaction in striate cortex of kittens reared with artificial squint. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Topographic reorganization in the striate cortex of the adult cat and monkey is cortically mediated , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[49]  W. Burke,et al.  Topographic reorganization in area 18 of adult cats following circumscribed monocular retinal lesions in adolescence , 2002, The Journal of physiology.

[50]  Z. Henderson An anatomical investigation of projections from lateral geniculate nucleus to visual cortical areas 17 and 18 in newborn kitten , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[51]  G. Henry Receptive field classes of cells in the striate cortex of the cat , 1977, Brain Research.

[52]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Lateral interactions in visual cortex. , 1990, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[53]  U. Eysel,et al.  A functional sign of reorganization in the visual system of adult cats: Lateral geniculate neurons with displaced receptive fields after lesions of the nasal retina , 1980, Brain Research.

[54]  M. Rosa,et al.  Responsiveness of cat area 17 after monocular inactivation: limitation of topographic plasticity in adult cortex. , 1995, The Journal of physiology.

[55]  H. Komatsu,et al.  Perceptual filling-in at the scotoma following a monocular retinal lesion in the monkey , 1997, Visual Neuroscience.

[56]  J. Movshon,et al.  Visual neural development. , 1981, Annual review of psychology.

[57]  M. Stryker,et al.  Ocular dominance in layer IV of the cat's visual cortex and the effects of monocular deprivation. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[58]  W. Burke,et al.  Cortical plasticity revealed by circumscribed retinal lesions or artificial scotomas. , 2001, Progress in brain research.

[59]  M. Cynader,et al.  Intrinsic projections within visual cortex: evidence for orientation-specific local connections. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  K. Albus A quantitative study of the projection area of the central and the paracentral visual field in area 17 of the cat , 1975, Experimental brain research.

[61]  G. Orban,et al.  Reorganization in the visual cortex after retinal and cortical damage. , 1999, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[62]  W. Singer,et al.  The origin and topography of long-range intrinsic projections in cat visual cortex: a developmental study. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[63]  D. Hubel,et al.  The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[64]  T. Kasamatsu,et al.  Retinotopic and nonretinotopic field potentials in cat visual cortex , 1994, Visual Neuroscience.

[65]  J. Kaas,et al.  Receptive-field properties of deafferentated visual cortical neurons after topographic map reorganization in adult cats , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[66]  W. Burke,et al.  Effects of selective pressure block of Y-type optic nerve fibers on the receptive-field properties of neurons in area 18 of the visual cortex of the cat , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[67]  S. Sherman,et al.  Organization of visual pathways in normal and visually deprived cats. , 1982, Physiological reviews.

[68]  H. J. Luhmann,et al.  Horizontal Interactions in Cat Striate Cortex: I. Anatomical Substrate and Postnatal Development , 1990, The European journal of neuroscience.

[69]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[70]  K. Fox,et al.  Injection of MK-801 affects ocular dominance shifts more than visual activity. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[71]  E. B. Roberts,et al.  Suppression of NMDA receptor function using antisense DNA block ocular dominance plasticity while preserving visual responses. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[72]  R. Freeman,et al.  Profile of the sensitive period for monocular deprivation in kittens , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[73]  K. Miller Understanding layer 4 of the cortical circuit: a model based on cat V1. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[74]  J. Gordon,et al.  Cellular mechanisms of visual cortical plasticity: a game of cat and mouse. , 1997, Learning & memory.

[75]  A. Monster,et al.  Motoneurone properties and motor fatigue , 1982, Experimental Brain Research.

[76]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Parallel processing of binocular disparity in the cat’s retinogeniculocortical pathways , 1987, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.