Incremental Top-k List Comparison Approach to Robust Multi-Structure Model Fitting

Random hypothesis sampling lies at the core of many popular robust fitting techniques such as RANSAC. In this paper, we propose a novel hypothesis sampling scheme based on incremental computation of distances between partial rankings (top-$k$ lists) derived from residual sorting information. Our method simultaneously (1) guides the sampling such that hypotheses corresponding to all true structures can be quickly retrieved and (2) filters the hypotheses such that only a small but very promising subset remain. This permits the usage of simple agglomerative clustering on the surviving hypotheses for accurate model selection. The outcome is a highly efficient multi-structure robust estimation technique. Experiments on synthetic and real data show the superior performance of our approach over previous methods.

[1]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[2]  Jiri Matas,et al.  Matching with PROSAC - progressive sample consensus , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[3]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  The multiRANSAC algorithm and its application to detect planar homographies , 2005, IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2005.

[4]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction , 2010 .

[5]  Jiri Matas,et al.  Locally Optimized RANSAC , 2003, DAGM-Symposium.

[6]  Torsten Sattler,et al.  SCRAMSAC: Improving RANSAC's efficiency with a spatial consistency filter , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[7]  David W. Murray,et al.  Guided-MLESAC: faster image transform estimation by using matching priors , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[8]  Hiroshi Kawakami,et al.  Detection of Planar Regions with Uncalibrated Stereo using Distributions of Feature Points , 2004, BMVC.

[9]  Dorin Comaniciu,et al.  Mean Shift: A Robust Approach Toward Feature Space Analysis , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Charles V. Stewart,et al.  Robust Parameter Estimation in Computer Vision , 1999, SIAM Rev..

[11]  Ronald Fagin,et al.  Comparing top k lists , 2003, SODA '03.

[12]  H. Opower Multiple view geometry in computer vision , 2002 .

[13]  Andrea Fusiello,et al.  Robust Multiple Structures Estimation with J-Linkage , 2008, ECCV.

[14]  É. Vincent,et al.  Detecting planar homographies in an image pair , 2001, ISPA 2001. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis. In conjunction with 23rd International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces (IEEE Cat..

[15]  Bernhard P. Wrobel,et al.  Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision , 2001 .

[16]  Matthijs C. Dorst Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .

[17]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Multiple View Geometry , 1999 .

[18]  Erkki Oja,et al.  A new curve detection method: Randomized Hough transform (RHT) , 1990, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[19]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.