A Monitoring Network Design Procedure for Three-Dimensional (3D) Groundwater Contaminant Source Identification

Finding the location and concentration of contaminant sources is an important step in groundwater remediation and management. This discovery typically requires the solution of an inverse problem. This inverse problem can be formulated as an optimization problem where the objective function is the sum of the square of the errors between the observed and predicted values of contaminant concentration at the observation wells. Studies show that the source identification accuracy is dependent on the observation locations (i.e., network geometry) and frequency of sampling; thus, finding a set of optimal monitoring well locations is very important for characterizing the source. The objective of this study is to propose a sensitivity-based method for optimal placement of monitoring wells by incorporating two uncertainties: the source location and hydraulic conductivity. An optimality metric called D-optimality in combination with a distance metric, which tends to make monitoring locations as far apart from each other as possible, is developed for finding optimal monitoring well locations for source identification. To address uncertainty in hydraulic conductivity, an integration method of multiple well designs is proposed based on multiple hydraulic conductivity realizations. Genetic algorithm is used as a search technique for this discrete combinatorial optimization problem. This procedure was applied to a hypothetical problem based on the well-known Borden Site data in Canada. The results show that the criterion-based selection proposed in this paper provides improved source identification performance when compared to uniformly distributed placement of wells.

[1]  Bithin Datta,et al.  Optimal Dynamic Monitoring Network Design and Identification of Unknown Groundwater Pollution Sources , 2009 .

[2]  J. Eheart,et al.  Monitoring network design to provide initial detection of groundwater contamination , 1994 .

[3]  Mary C Hill,et al.  Determining Extreme Parameter Correlation in Ground Water Models , 2003, Ground water.

[4]  Clifford I. Voss,et al.  Further comments on sensitivities, parameter estimation, and sampling design in one-dimensional analysis of solute transport in porous media , 1988 .

[5]  Clifford I. Voss,et al.  Multiobjective sampling design for parameter estimation and model discrimination in groundwater solute transport , 1989 .

[6]  George F. Pinder,et al.  Optimal Search Strategy for the Definition of a DNAPL Source , 2003 .

[7]  E. D. Brill,et al.  A method for locating wells in a groundwater monitoring network under conditions of uncertainty , 1988 .

[8]  Yun Yang,et al.  A niched Pareto tabu search for multi-objective optimal design of groundwater remediation systems , 2013 .

[9]  B. Hobbs,et al.  Review of Ground‐Water Quality Monitoring Network Design , 1993 .

[10]  D. Freyberg,et al.  A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: 1. Approach and overview of plume movement , 1986 .

[11]  David Redman,et al.  A Field Experiment to Study the Behavior of Tetrachloroethylene Below the Water Table: Spatial Distribution of Residual and Pooled DNAPL , 1993 .

[12]  R. Ababou,et al.  Implementation of the three‐dimensional turning bands random field generator , 1989 .

[13]  Joseph R. Kasprzyk,et al.  A new epsilon-dominance hierarchical Bayesian optimization algorithm for large multiobjective monitoring network design problems , 2008 .

[14]  M. Sayeed,et al.  Efficient Parallel Implementation of Hybrid Optimization Approaches for Solving Groundwater Inverse Problems , 2005 .

[15]  J. Kiefer,et al.  Optimum Designs in Regression Problems , 1959 .

[16]  Yonathan Bard,et al.  Nonlinear parameter estimation , 1974 .

[17]  Xin Jin.  Optimization-based methodologies for detection and monitoring of groundwater sources , 2008 .

[18]  M. Rivett,et al.  A controlled field experiment on groundwater contamination by a multicomponent DNAPL: creation of the emplaced-source and overview of dissolved plume development. , 2001, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[19]  G. Mahinthakumar,et al.  Hybrid Genetic Algorithm—Local Search Methods for Solving Groundwater Source Identification Inverse Problems , 2005 .

[20]  Hund-Der Yeh,et al.  Groundwater contaminant source identification by a hybrid heuristic approach , 2007 .

[21]  T. Brubaker,et al.  Nonlinear Parameter Estimation , 1979 .

[22]  Bithin Datta,et al.  Optimal Monitoring Network and Ground-Water–Pollution Source Identification , 1997 .

[23]  Bernard H. Kueper,et al.  A field experiment to study the behavior of tetrachloroethylene in unsaturated porous media , 1992 .

[24]  Ranji S. Ranjithan,et al.  A parallel evolutionary strategy based simulation–optimization approach for solving groundwater source identification problems , 2009 .

[25]  C. Voss,et al.  Behavior of sensitivities in the one-dimensional advection-dispersion equation: Implications for parameter estimation and sampling design , 1987 .

[26]  E. Sudicky.  A natural gradient experiment on solute transport in a sand aquifer: Spatial variability of hydraulic conductivity and its role in the dispersion process , 1986 .

[27]  Ranji S. Ranjithan,et al.  A genetic algorithm-based procedure for 3D source identification at the Borden emplacement site , 2009 .

[28]  Kathryn W. Thorbjarnarson,et al.  A forced-gradient experiment on solute transport in the Borden aquifer: 1. Experimental methods and , 1994 .