Modeling and Simulation of Hybrid Soft Robots Using Finite Element Methods: Brief Overview and Benefits

Mathematical modeling of hybrid soft robots is complicated by the description of the complex shape that they undergone when subject to actuation and external loads. It might be noticed that several approaches have been used so far in robotics, and the problem is not yet fully solved. This short paper aims at presenting an overview of modeling and simulation approaches for soft robots based on finite element methods. Benefits and perspectives of future directions are also discussed.

[1]  Frédéric Boyer,et al.  Locomotion and elastodynamics model of an underwater shell-like soft robot , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[2]  Jamie Paik,et al.  Modeling, Design, and Development of Soft Pneumatic Actuators with Finite Element Method   , 2016 .

[3]  Nobuto Matsuhira,et al.  Virtual Robot Experimentation Platform V-REP: A Versatile 3D Robot Simulator , 2010, SIMPAR.

[4]  Howie Choset,et al.  Continuum Robots for Medical Applications: A Survey , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[5]  Giorgio Grioli,et al.  The Quest for Natural Machine Motion: An Open Platform to Fast-Prototyping Articulated Soft Robots , 2017, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[6]  J. C. Simo,et al.  On the Dynamics of Flexible Beams Under Large Overall Motions—The Plane Case: Part II , 1986 .

[7]  Arthur W. Mahoney,et al.  Continuum Reconfigurable Parallel Robots for Surgery: Shape Sensing and State Estimation With Uncertainty , 2017, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[8]  Matteo Cianchetti,et al.  Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities , 2016, Science Robotics.

[9]  Stephane Cotin,et al.  EP4A: Software and Computer Based Simulator Research: Development and Outlook SOFA—An Open Source Framework for Medical Simulation , 2007, MMVR.

[10]  Christian Duriez,et al.  Stiffness Control of Deformable Robots Using Finite Element Modeling , 2019, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters.

[11]  Peter Betsch,et al.  Validation of flexible multibody dynamics beam formulations using benchmark problems , 2015 .

[12]  Arianna Menciassi,et al.  Finite Element Analysis and Design Optimization of a Pneumatically Actuating Silicone Module for Robotic Surgery Applications , 2014 .

[13]  Andrew Howard,et al.  Design and use paradigms for Gazebo, an open-source multi-robot simulator , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[14]  J. C. Simo,et al.  A three-dimensional finite-strain rod model. Part II: Computational aspects , 1986 .

[15]  Christian Duriez,et al.  Fast, Generic, and Reliable Control and Simulation of Soft Robots Using Model Order Reduction , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[16]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Nonlinear Finite Elements for Continua and Structures , 2000 .

[17]  S. Antman.  Nonlinear problems of elasticity , 1994 .

[18]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Soft robotics , 2008, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[19]  Cv Clemens Verhoosel,et al.  Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures , 1991 .

[20]  Daniela Rus,et al.  Model-based dynamic feedback control of a planar soft robot: trajectory tracking and interaction with the environment , 2020, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[21]  Ioannis M. Rekleitis,et al.  The Avatar Project , 2008, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[22]  Christian Duriez,et al.  SOFA: A Multi-Model Framework for Interactive Physical Simulation , 2012 .

[23]  Bruno Siciliano,et al.  A Geometrically Exact Model for Soft Continuum Robots: The Finite Element Deformation Space Formulation. , 2019, Soft robotics.