Inactivity Recognition: Separating Moving Phones from Stationary Users

Accurate methods of detecting whether a person is at rest form an important component in indoor localization and sedentary lifestyle monitoring. The problem of quantifying rest is complicated by the variety of activities and phone configurations that exist even when the user location is stationary. Our study examines whether on-phone kinematic sensors can be used to accurately and consistently detect rest. Rest is defined as a user's absolute positioning with respect to a world coordinate frame not changing significantly over a fixed time interval. An important requirement in our approach is that the algorithm maintains its accuracy independent of orientation and on-body location. The techniques examined show high accuracy classification (>95%) with test participants simulating typical everyday tasks in an office environment. An important contribution of our approach is showing that rest detection accuracy improved when accounting for the orientation of the phone for the activities discussed.

[1]  Klaus Winkelmann Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence , 1989, Künstliche Intell..

[2]  Mirco Musolesi,et al.  Sensing meets mobile social networks: the design, implementation and evaluation of the CenceMe application , 2008, SenSys '08.

[3]  Yi Wang,et al.  A framework of energy efficient mobile sensing for automatic user state recognition , 2009, MobiSys '09.

[4]  Injong Rhee,et al.  Towards Mobile Phone Localization without War-Driving , 2010, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[5]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[6]  Ling Bao,et al.  Activity Recognition from User-Annotated Acceleration Data , 2004, Pervasive.

[7]  L. Vicci Quaternions and Rotations in 3-Space: The Algebra and its Geometric Interpretation , 2001 .

[8]  Gaurav S. Sukhatme,et al.  A Data-Driven Movement Model for Single Cellphone-Based Indoor Positioning , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Body Sensor Networks.

[9]  Gaetano Borriello,et al.  A Practical Approach to Recognizing Physical Activities , 2006, Pervasive.

[10]  Mashfiqui Rabbi,et al.  Objective Measurement of Sociability and Activity: Mobile Sensing in the Community , 2011, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[11]  Michael L. Littman,et al.  Activity Recognition from Accelerometer Data , 2005, AAAI.

[12]  Hari Balakrishnan,et al.  Accurate, Low-Energy Trajectory Mapping for Mobile Devices , 2011, NSDI.

[13]  Fehmi Ben Abdesslem,et al.  Less is more: energy-efficient mobile sensing with senseless , 2009, MobiHeld '09.

[14]  Oliver J. Woodman,et al.  An introduction to inertial navigation , 2007 .