Infant and Adult Brains Are Coupled to the Dynamics of Natural Communication

Infancy is the foundational period for learning from adults, and the dynamics of the social environment have long been proposed as central to children’s development. Here we reveal a novel, highly naturalistic approach for studying live interactions between infants and adults. Using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), we simultaneously and continuously measured the brains of infants (9-15 months) and an adult while they communicated and played with each other in real time. We found that time-locked neural coupling within dyads was significantly greater when they interacted with each other than with control individuals. In addition, we found that both infant and adult brains continuously tracked the moment-to-moment fluctuations of mutual gaze, infant emotion, and adult speech prosody with high temporal precision. This investigation advances what is currently known about how the brains and behaviors of infants both shape and reflect those of adults during real-life communication.

[1]  P vanGeert.  A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action - Thelen,E, Smith,LB , 1996 .

[2]  Uri Hasson,et al.  Propagation of information along the cortical hierarchy as a function of attention while reading and listening to stories , 2018, bioRxiv.

[3]  M Wolf,et al.  How to detect and reduce movement artifacts in near-infrared imaging using moving standard deviation and spline interpolation , 2010, Physiological measurement.

[4]  Christopher J. Honey,et al.  Same Story , Different Story : The Neural Representation of Interpretive Frameworks , 2017 .

[5]  Gianlorenzo Fagiolo,et al.  Development of BOLD signal hemodynamic responses in the human brain , 2012, NeuroImage.

[6]  U. Hasson,et al.  Speaker–listener neural coupling underlies successful communication , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  D. Poeppel,et al.  Sensitivity of Newborn Auditory Cortex to the Temporal Structure of Sounds , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  T. Ono,et al.  Selective Medial Prefrontal Cortex Responses During Live Mutual Gaze Interactions in Human Infants: An fNIRS Study , 2015, Brain Topography.

[10]  Xian Zhang,et al.  Frontal temporal and parietal systems synchronize within and across brains during live eye-to-eye contact , 2017, NeuroImage.

[11]  Brock Ferguson,et al.  Communicative signals support abstract rule learning by 7-month-old infants , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[12]  By Enrique Vargas,et al.  Dynamic Reconfiguration , 2003, Series in Computer Science.

[13]  Michael J. Richardson,et al.  Social Connection Through Joint Action and Interpersonal Coordination , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[14]  Hugh Rabagliati,et al.  The profile of abstract rule learning in infancy: Meta‐analytic and experimental evidence , 2018, Developmental science.

[15]  Andrew N Meltzoff,et al.  Infant gaze following and pointing predict accelerated vocabulary growth through two years of age: a longitudinal, growth curve modeling study* , 2008, Journal of Child Language.

[16]  M. Tomasello.  The social bases of language acquisition , 1992 .

[17]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[18]  B. Ryan.  Speaking rate, conversational speech acts, interruption, and linguistic complexity of 20 pre-school stuttering and non-stuttering children and their mothers , 2000, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[19]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Taking shape: supporting preschoolers' acquisition of geometric knowledge through guided play. , 2013, Child development.

[20]  Laurel J. Trainor,et al.  Infant-Directed Speech Is Modulated by Infant Feedback , 2008 .

[21]  Janice Chen,et al.  Dynamic reconfiguration of the default mode network during narrative comprehension , 2016, Nature Communications.

[22]  D. Corina,et al.  Preference for language in early infancy: the human language bias is not speech specific. , 2008, Developmental science.

[23]  G. Csibra,et al.  Gaze Following in Human Infants Depends on Communicative Signals , 2008, Current Biology.

[24]  Lauren L. Emberson,et al.  Expectation affects neural repetition suppression in infancy , 2018, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  U. Hasson,et al.  On the Same Wavelength: Predictable Language Enhances Speaker–Listener Brain-to-Brain Synchrony in Posterior Superior Temporal Gyrus , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Acoustic determinants of infant preference for motherese speech , 1987 .

[27]  S. Garrod,et al.  Brain-to-brain coupling: a mechanism for creating and sharing a social world , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Developmental process emerges from extended brain–body–behavior networks , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  Uri Hasson,et al.  Not Lost in Translation: Neural Responses Shared Across Languages , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  David A. Boas,et al.  Twenty years of functional near-infrared spectroscopy: introduction for the special issue , 2014, NeuroImage.

[31]  J. Cohn,et al.  Mother infant face to face interaction influence is bidirectional and unrelated to periodic cycles in either partner's behavior , 1988 .

[32]  Katharine Graf Estes,et al.  Infant-directed prosody helps infants map sounds to meanings. , 2013, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[33]  Jennifer M. D. Yoon,et al.  Communication-induced memory biases in preverbal infants , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  D. Jackson,et al.  Play as learning , 1974 .

[35]  S. Wass,et al.  Speaker gaze increases information coupling between infant and adult brains , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  V. Noreika,et al.  Parental neural responsivity to infants’ visual attention: How mature brains influence immature brains during social interaction , 2018, PLoS biology.

[37]  Yuan Chang Leong,et al.  How We Transmit Memories to Other Brains: Constructing Shared Neural Representations Via Communication , 2016, bioRxiv.

[38]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  The development of gaze following and its relation to language. , 2005, Developmental science.

[39]  L. Vygotsky.  Interaction between learning and development , 1978 .

[40]  L. Trainor,et al.  Pitch characteristics of infant-directed speech affect infants’ ability to discriminate vowels , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[41]  U. Hasson,et al.  Shared understanding is correlated with shared neural responses in the default mode network , 2017, bioRxiv.

[42]  A. Sameroff.  The transactional model of development: How children and contexts shape each other. , 2009 .

[43]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[44]  Tony Charman,et al.  Neural Correlates of Eye Gaze Processing in the Infant Broader Autism Phenotype , 2009, Biological Psychiatry.

[45]  Chaozhe Zhu,et al.  Neural Synchronization during Face-to-Face Communication , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  T. Brazelton,et al.  The origins of reciprocity : The early mother-infant interaction , 1974 .

[47]  P. Shaver,et al.  Mechanisms of social connection: From brain to group. , 2014 .

[48]  A. Fernald,et al.  Expanded Intonation Contours in Mothers' Speech to Newborns. , 1984 .

[49]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Newborns' preference for face-relevant stimuli: effects of contrast polarity. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[50]  G. Csibra,et al.  Natural pedagogy , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[51]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Gaze following: A mechanism for building social connections between infants and adults. , 2014 .

[52]  Frank Schneider,et al.  Same or different? Neural correlates of happy and sad mood in healthy males , 2005, NeuroImage.

[53]  Erik D. Thiessen,et al.  Infant-Directed Speech Facilitates Word Segmentation. , 2005, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[54]  J. Werker,et al.  Tuned to the signal: the privileged status of speech for young infants. , 2004, Developmental science.

[55]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  The Developing Infant Creates a Curriculum for Statistical Learning , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[56]  A. Sameroff.  The transactional model. , 2009 .

[57]  Linda B. Smith,et al.  Joint Attention without Gaze Following: Human Infants and Their Parents Coordinate Visual Attention to Objects through Eye-Hand Coordination , 2013, PloS one.

[58]  C. Honey,et al.  Topographic Mapping of a Hierarchy of Temporal Receptive Windows Using a Narrated Story , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[59]  Marc Leman,et al.  The Cortical Topography of Tonal Structures Underlying Western Music , 2002, Science.

[60]  Uri Hasson,et al.  Same Story, Different Story , 2017, Psychological science.

[61]  Marius Catalin Iordan,et al.  Mothers Consistently Alter Their Unique Vocal Fingerprints When Communicating with Infants , 2017, Current Biology.

[62]  Elise A. Piazza,et al.  Measuring speaker–listener neural coupling with functional near infrared spectroscopy , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[63]  M. Goldstein,et al.  Social interaction shapes babbling: Testing parallels between birdsong and speech , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[64]  Scott P. Johnson,et al.  Infant Rule Learning Facilitated by Speech , 2007, Psychological science.

[65]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Evidence for ‘motionese’: modifications in mothers’ infant-directed action , 2002 .

[66]  Uri Hasson,et al.  Amplification of local changes along the timescale processing hierarchy , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[67]  Uri Hasson,et al.  Propagation of information along the cortical hierarchy as a function of attention while reading and listening to stories , 2018, bioRxiv.