Topology control for predictable delay-tolerant networks based on probability

In wireless networks, topology control can improve energy effectiveness and increase the communication capacity. In predictable delay tolerant networks (PDTNs), intermittent connectivity, network partitioning, and long delays make most of the researchers focus on routing protocol, and the research on topology control is in the very early stage. Most existing topology control approaches for PDTN assume the underlying connections are deterministic, which excludes a large amount of probabilistic connections existing in the challenged environments. In this paper, probabilistic connections are taking into consideration. The predictable delay tolerant networks are modeled as a three dimensional space-time weighted directed graph which includes spatial, temporal and connection probability information. The topology control problem is formulated as finding a sub graph to balance the energy cost and data transferring reliability. This problem is proved to be NP-complete, and two heuristic algorithms are proposed to solve the problem. The first one is to find a sub graph that assures the maximum connection probability between each pair of nodes. The other one is to find the sub graph in which the connection probabilities between each pair of nodes satisfy the given threshold with the minimum energy cost. Extensive simulation experiments demonstrate that the proposed topology control algorithms can achieve our goal.

[1]  Robert Tappan Morris,et al.  ExOR: opportunistic multi-hop routing for wireless networks , 2005, SIGCOMM '05.

[2]  Sachin Katti,et al.  Trading structure for randomness in wireless opportunistic routing , 2007, SIGCOMM 2007.

[3]  Hongyi Wu,et al.  A survey on analytic studies of Delay-Tolerant Mobile Sensor Networks , 2007, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[4]  Ram Ramanathan,et al.  Challenges: a radically new architecture for next generation mobile ad hoc networks , 2005, MobiCom '05.

[5]  Siyuan Chen,et al.  Topology Control for Time-Evolving and Predictable Delay-Tolerant Networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Eighth International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems.

[6]  Jie Wu,et al.  Predict and relay: an efficient routing in disruption-tolerant networks , 2009, MobiHoc '09.

[7]  Siyuan Chen,et al.  Efficient Topology Design in Time-Evolving and Energy-Harvesting Wireless Sensor Networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on Mobile Ad-Hoc and Sensor Systems.

[8]  Lui Sha,et al.  Design and analysis of an MST-based topology control algorithm , 2005, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun..

[9]  Anders Lindgren,et al.  Probabilistic Routing in Intermittently Connected Networks , 2004, SAPIR.

[11]  Bhaskar Krishnamachari,et al.  Backpressure with Adaptive Redundancy (BWAR) , 2012, 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[12]  Shouling Ji,et al.  Snapshot/Continuous Data Collection capacity for large-scale probabilistic Wireless Sensor Networks , 2012, 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[13]  Waylon Brunette,et al.  Data MULEs: modeling a three-tier architecture for sparse sensor networks , 2003, Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, 2003..

[14]  Yong Wang,et al.  Energy-efficient computing for wildlife tracking: design tradeoffs and early experiences with ZebraNet , 2002, ASPLOS X.

[15]  Minsu Huang,et al.  Topology design in time-evolving delay-tolerant networks with unreliable links , 2012, 2012 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[16]  Brian Gallagher,et al.  MaxProp: Routing for Vehicle-Based Disruption-Tolerant Networks , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[17]  Cauligi S. Raghavendra,et al.  Spray and wait: an efficient routing scheme for intermittently connected mobile networks , 2005, WDTN '05.

[18]  Ellen W. Zegura,et al.  Controlling the mobility of multiple data transport ferries in a delay-tolerant network , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[19]  Bhaskar Krishnamachari,et al.  Experimental study of concurrent transmission in wireless sensor networks , 2006, SenSys '06.

[20]  Timur Friedman,et al.  Evaluating Mobility Pattern Space Routing for DTNs , 2005, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[21]  Yu Wang,et al.  A survey on analytic studies of Delay-Tolerant Mobile Sensor Networks: Research Articles , 2007 .

[22]  Amin Vahdat,et al.  Epidemic Routing for Partially-Connected Ad Hoc Networks , 2009 .

[23]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  Directional routing and scheduling for green vehicular delay tolerant networks , 2012, Wireless Networks.

[24]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Statistical model of lossy links in wireless sensor networks , 2005, IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005..

[25]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[26]  Xiang-Yang Li,et al.  Localized Construction of Bounded Degree and Planar Spanner for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks , 2003, DIALM-POMC '03.

[27]  Oliver Brock,et al.  MV routing and capacity building in disruption tolerant networks , 2005, Proceedings IEEE 24th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies..

[28]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  Backpressure-based routing protocol for DTNs , 2010, SIGCOMM '10.

[29]  Douglas S. Reeves,et al.  The delay-constrained minimum spanning tree problem , 1997, Proceedings Second IEEE Symposium on Computer and Communications.

[30]  Athanasios V. Vasilakos,et al.  Routing for disruption tolerant networks: taxonomy and design , 2010, Wirel. Networks.

[31]  Xiang-Yang Li,et al.  Efficient distributed low-cost backbone formation for wireless networks , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[32]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Temporal Properties of Low Power Wireless Links: Modeling and Implications on Multi-Hop Routing , 2005 .