Personal Vehicles Evaluated against Climate Change Mitigation Targets.

Meeting global climate change mitigation goals will likely require that transportation-related greenhouse gas emissions begin to decline within the next two decades and then continue to fall. A variety of vehicle technologies and fuels are commercially available to consumers today that can reduce the emissions of the transportation sector. Yet what are the best options, and do any suffice to meet climate policy targets? Here, we examine the costs and carbon intensities of 125 light-duty vehicle models on the U.S. market today and evaluate these models against U.S. emission-reduction targets for 2030, 2040, and 2050 that are compatible with the goal of limiting mean global temperature rise to 2 °C above preindustrial levels. Our results show that consumers are not required to pay more for a low-carbon-emitting vehicle. Across the diverse set of vehicle models and powertrain technologies examined, a clean vehicle is usually a low-cost vehicle. Although the average carbon intensity of vehicles sold in 2014 exceeds the climate target for 2030 by more than 50%, we find that most hybrid and battery electric vehicles available today meet this target. By 2050, only electric vehicles supplied with almost completely carbon-free electric power are expected to meet climate-policy targets.

[1]  Anibal T. de Almeida,et al.  Impact of the electricity mix and use profile in the life-cycle assessment of electric vehicles , 2013 .

[2]  Mark Z. Jacobson,et al.  100% clean and renewable wind, water, and sunlight (WWS) all-sector energy roadmaps for the 50 United States , 2015 .

[3]  C. Weber,et al.  Growth in emission transfers via international trade from 1990 to 2008 , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  The environmental performance of current and future passenger vehicles: Life cycle assessment based on a novel scenario analysis framework , 2015 .

[5]  Christopher J. Koroneos,et al.  Comparative economic and environmental analysis of conventional, hybrid and electric vehicles – the case study of Greece , 2013 .

[6]  Michael Wang,et al.  Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Advanced Fuel/Vehicle Systems — A North American Study of Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Criteria Pollutant Emissions , 2005 .

[7]  J. Greenblatt,et al.  Autonomous taxis could greatly reduce greenhouse-gas emissions of US light-duty vehicles , 2015 .

[8]  W. R. Morrow,et al.  The Technology Path to Deep Greenhouse Gas Emissions Cuts by 2050: The Pivotal Role of Electricity , 2012, Science.

[9]  Steven K. Firth,et al.  Who rebounds most? Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for different UK socioeconomic groups , 2014 .

[10]  D. Greene.  How Consumers Value Fuel Economy: A Literature Review , 2010 .

[11]  J. Trancik,et al.  Metals Production Requirements for Rapid Photovoltaics Deployment , 2014, 1501.03039.

[12]  J. Doyne Farmer.  Dynamics of technological development in the energy sector , 2007 .

[13]  Michael Cw Kintner-Meyer,et al.  Electric Vehicles and the Electric Grid , 2014 .

[14]  James McNerney,et al.  Metals Production Requirements for Rapid Photovoltaics Deployment , 2014 .

[15]  O. Johansson,et al.  Optimal road-pricing: Simultaneous treatment of time losses, increased fuel consumption, and emissions , 1997 .

[16]  M Granger Morgan,et al.  Marginal emissions factors for the U.S. electricity system. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Jessika E. Trancik,et al.  Potential for widespread electrification of personal vehicle travel in the United States , 2016, Nature Energy.

[18]  Edwards Robert,et al.  Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Future Automotive Fuels and Power Trains in the European Context - Report, Version 3c , 2011 .

[19]  J. Tarascon,et al.  Towards greener and more sustainable batteries for electrical energy storage. , 2015, Nature chemistry.

[20]  Christina Karapataki,et al.  Effectiveness of a segmental approach to climate policy. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  André Faaij,et al.  Energy use, cost and CO 2 emissions of electric cars , 2011 .

[22]  Venkat Srinivasan,et al.  Resource constraints on the battery energy storage potential for grid and transportation applications , 2011 .

[23]  Christopher M. Jones,et al.  Deep carbon reductions in California require electrification and integration across economic sectors , 2013 .

[24]  Jessika E. Trancik,et al.  Energy technologies evaluated against climate targets using a cost and carbon trade-off curve. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Yafeng Yin,et al.  Robust signal timing optimization with environmental concerns , 2013 .

[26]  R. Ozaki,et al.  Going hybrid: An analysis of consumer purchase motivations , 2011 .

[27]  K. Train,et al.  Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles , 1999, Controlling Automobile Air Pollution.

[28]  M. Torn,et al.  Pathways to Deep Decarbonization in the United States , 2015 .

[29]  J. Trancik,et al.  Statistical Basis for Predicting Technological Progress , 2012, PloS one.

[30]  Jessika E. Trancik,et al.  Determinants of the Pace of Global Innovation in Energy Technologies , 2012, PloS one.

[31]  Michael Kuss,et al.  Co-benefits of large scale plug-in hybrid electric vehicle and solar PV deployment , 2013 .

[32]  A. Majumdar,et al.  Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future , 2012, Nature.

[33]  Felix Creutzig,et al.  Climate policies for road transport revisited (I): Evaluation of the current framework , 2011 .

[34]  J. Zuboy,et al.  Analyzing the Levelized Cost of Centralized and Distributed Hydrogen Production Using the H2A Production Model, Version 2 , 2009 .

[35]  R. Lindsey,et al.  Reducing Urban Road Transportation Externalities: Road Pricing in Theory and in Practice , 2011, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[36]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Will subsidies drive electric vehicle adoption? Measuring consumer preferences in the U.S. and China , 2015 .

[37]  B. Wee,et al.  The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption , 2014 .

[38]  Amgad Elgowainy,et al.  Well-To-Wheels Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2009 .

[39]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Valuation of plug-in vehicle life-cycle air emissions and oil displacement benefits , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Changxu Wu,et al.  A fuel economy optimization system with applications in vehicles with human drivers and autonomous vehicles , 2011 .

[41]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Environmental impacts of hybrid and electric vehicles—a review , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[42]  N. W. Washington,et al.  INVENTORY OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND SINKS , 2005 .

[43]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Future fuel cell and internal combustion engine automobile technologies: A 25-year life cycle and fleet impact assessment , 2006 .

[44]  Emmanuel P Kasseris,et al.  On the Road in 2035 : Reducing Transportation ’ s Petroleum Consumption and GHG Emissions , 2008 .

[45]  Timothy J Wallington,et al.  Light-duty vehicle CO2 targets consistent with 450 ppm CO2 stabilization. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[46]  L B Lave,et al.  A life-cycle comparison of alternative automobile fuels. , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[47]  Joeri Van Mierlo,et al.  Environmental impacts of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and battery electric vehicles—what can we learn from life cycle assessment? , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[48]  David B. Richardson,et al.  Electric vehicles and the electric grid: A review of modeling approaches, Impacts, and renewable energy integration , 2013 .

[49]  Joeri Van Mierlo,et al.  A Range-Based Vehicle Life Cycle Assessment Incorporating Variability in the Environmental Assessment of Different Vehicle Technologies and Fuels , 2014 .

[50]  N. Höhne,et al.  Reductions of greenhouse gas emissions in Annex I and non-Annex I countries for meeting concentration stabilisation targets , 2008 .

[51]  Stacy Cagle Davis,et al.  Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 34 , 2015 .

[52]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Climate change 2014 : mitigation of climate change , 2014 .

[53]  Jeremy J. Michalek,et al.  Optimal design and allocation of electrified vehicles and dedicated charging infrastructure for minimum life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and cost , 2012 .

[54]  Lin Gao,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Environmental and Economic Impacts of Advanced Vehicles , 2012 .

[55]  M. Ha-Duong,et al.  Climate change 2014 - Mitigation of climate change , 2015 .

[56]  Reinhard Madlener,et al.  Consumer Preferences for Alternative Fuel Vehicles: A Discrete Choice Analysis , 2012 .

[57]  P. Fischbeck,et al.  How will we fund our roads? A case of decreasing revenue from electric vehicles , 2015 .

[58]  Dawei Wang,et al.  Life cycle analysis of internal combustion engine, electric and fuel cell vehicles for China , 2013 .

[59]  Troy R. Hawkins,et al.  Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles , 2013 .

[60]  Marco Frey,et al.  Comparison between hydrogen and electric vehicles by life cycle assessment: A case study in Tuscany, Italy , 2011 .

[61]  P. Haan,et al.  How much do incentives affect car purchase? Agent-based microsimulation of consumer choice of new cars—Part I: Model structure, simulation of bounded rationality, and model validation , 2009 .

[62]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Consumption-based GHG emission accounting: a UK case study , 2013 .

[63]  Stacy Cagle Davis,et al.  Transportation energy data book , 2008 .

[64]  Christian Bauer,et al.  Integrated environmental and economic assessment of current and future fuel cell vehicles , 2015, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.