The effects of angle-arm length on judgments of angle magnitude and orientation contrast

Acute angles frequently are overestimated, an effect that has been attributed to lateral inhibitory mechanisms. It can be derived from such theories that lengthening the arms of an angle should either reduce or not affect its judged subtense. However, in Experiments 1 and 2, it was found that angles with longer arms were judged larger. In Experiment 3, direct measures of anglearm orientation indicated that orientation contrast does not increase with angle-arm length, that it decreases with distance from the angle vertex, and that these effects are not averaged along the entire length of the arm. It follows that inhibitory mechanisms alone cannot explain why longer armed angles appear larger or why angle arms appear straight rather than bowed. It is suggested that a distinction is required between the orientation and the angular domains and that the latter judgments depend, at least partially, on the space or area within an angle. The fact that angles appear unbowed may reflect the fact that perceived orientation differences occur along an angle’s arm only when matches are made to small segments of the arm.

[1]  L. Ganz.  Mechanism of the figural aftereffects. , 1966, Psychological review.

[2]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  Analysis of the angle perception based on the angle matching technique , 1981, Vision Research.

[4]  Constant errors occur in matched reproduction of angles even when likely biases are eliminated , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[5]  J Z Levinson,et al.  Perception of size of one object among many. , 1979, Science.

[6]  J. O. Robinson.  The Psychology of Visual Illusion , 1972 .

[7]  Peter Wenderoth,et al.  The tilt illusion: Repulsion and attraction effects in the oblique meridian , 1977, Vision Research.

[8]  P. Wenderoth,et al.  Angle-Matching Illusions and Perceived Line Orientation , 1979, Perception.

[9]  Constant errors donot occur in the matched reproduction of angles , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  J. Frisby.  Seeing: Illusion, Brain and Mind , 1979 .

[11]  H. Bouma,et al.  Perceived orientation of isolated line segments. , 1968, Vision research.

[12]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Lateral Inhibition between Orientation Detectors in the Human Visual System , 1970, Nature.

[13]  Peter Wenderoth,et al.  Perceptual distortion of an oblique line in the presence of an abutting vertical line , 1978, Vision Research.

[14]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  T. Cornsweet,et al.  The staircrase-method in psychophysics. , 1962, The American journal of psychology.

[16]  O. Creutzfeldt,et al.  Significance of intracortical inhibition in the visual cortex. , 1972, Nature: New biology.

[17]  W. Hotopf,et al.  Position in the Visual Field and Spatial Expansion , 1983, Perception.

[18]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[19]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex , 1977 .

[20]  D. Hubel,et al.  Ferrier lecture - Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[21]  P Lennie,et al.  Distortions of perceived orientation. , 1971, Nature: New biology.

[22]  H. Bouma,et al.  Induced changes in the perceived orientation of line segments. , 1970, Vision research.