Optimizing Multi-class Fleet Compositions for Shared Mobility-as-a-Service

Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) systems are transforming the way society moves. The introduction and adoption of pooled ride-sharing has revolutionized urban transit with the potential of reducing vehicle congestion, improving accessibility and flexibility of a city’s transportation infrastructure. Recently developed algorithms can compute routes for vehicles in realtime for a city-scale volume of requests, as well as optimize fleet sizes for MaaS systems that allow requests to share vehicles. Nonetheless, they are not capable of reasoning about the composition of a fleet and their varying capacity classes. In this paper, we present a method to not only optimize fleet sizes, but also their multi-class composition for MaaS systems that allow requests to share vehicles. We present an algorithm to determine how many vehicles of each class and capacity are needed, where they should be initialized, and how they should be routed to service all the travel demand for a given period of time. The algorithm maximizes utilization while reducing the total number of vehicles and incorporates constraints on wait- times and travel-delays. Finally, we evaluate the effectiveness of the algorithm for multi-class fleets with pooled ride-sharing using 426,908 historical taxi requests from Manhattan and 187,243 downtown Singapore. We show fleets comprised of vehicles with smaller capacities can reduce the total travel delay by 10% in Manhattan whereas larger capacity fleets in downtown Singapore contribute to a 9% reduction in the total waiting time.

[1]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Privacy-preserving vehicle assignment for mobility-on-demand systems , 2017, 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[2]  Paolo Santi,et al.  Supporting Information for Quantifying the Benefits of Vehicle Pooling with Shareability Networks Data Set and Pre-processing , 2022 .

[3]  R. Tachet,et al.  Scaling Law of Urban Ride Sharing , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[4]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  Autonomous Vehicle Fleet Sizes Required to Serve Different Levels of Demand , 2016 .

[5]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Toward a Systematic Approach to the Design and Evaluation of Automated Mobility-on-Demand Systems: A Case Study in Singapore , 2014 .

[6]  Oded Cats,et al.  Designing an Automated Demand-Responsive Transport System: Fleet Size and Performance Analysis for a Campus–Train Station Service , 2016 .

[7]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Robotic load balancing for mobility-on-demand systems , 2012, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[8]  Javier Alonso-Mora,et al.  Multi-Objective Analysis of Ridesharing in Automated Mobility-on-Demand , 2018, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[9]  Javier Alonso-Mora,et al.  Optimizing Vehicle Distributions and Fleet Sizes for Shared Mobility-on-Demand , 2019, 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[10]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  Asymptotically Optimal Algorithms for One-to-One Pickup and Delivery Problems With Applications to Transportation Systems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[11]  Marco Pavone,et al.  Control of robotic mobility-on-demand systems: A queueing-theoretical perspective , 2014, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[12]  Emilio Frazzoli,et al.  On-demand high-capacity ride-sharing via dynamic trip-vehicle assignment , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  P. Santi,et al.  Addressing the minimum fleet problem in on-demand urban mobility , 2018, Nature.