Non-Invasive Continuous Glucose Monitoring with Multi-Sensor Systems: A Monte Carlo-Based Methodology for Assessing Calibration Robustness

In diabetes research, non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring (NI-CGM) devices represent a new and appealing frontier. In the last years, some multi-sensor devices for NI-CGM have been proposed, which exploit several sensors measuring phenomena of different nature, not only for measuring glucose related signals, but also signals reflecting some possible perturbing processes (temperature, blood perfusion). Estimation of glucose levels is then obtained combining these signals through a mathematical model which requires an initial calibration step exploiting one reference blood glucose (RBG) sample. Even if promising results have been obtained, especially in hospitalized volunteers, at present the temporal accuracy of NI-CGM sensors may suffer because of environmental and physiological interferences. The aim of this work is to develop a general methodology, based on Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, to assess the robustness of the calibration step used by NI-CGM devices against these disturbances. The proposed methodology is illustrated considering two examples: the first concerns the possible detrimental influence of sweat events, while the second deals with calibration scheduling. For implementing both examples, 45 datasets collected by the Solianis Multisensor system are considered. In the first example, the MC methodology suggests that no further calibration adjustments are needed after the occurrence of sweat events, because the “Multisensor+model” system is able to deal with the disturbance. The second case study shows how to identify the best time interval to update the model's calibration for improving the accuracy of the estimated glucose. The methodology proposed in this work is of general applicability and can be helpful in making those incremental steps in NI-CGM devices development needed to further improve their performance.

[1]  Giovanni Sparacino,et al.  Enhanced accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring by online extended kalman filtering. , 2010, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[2]  Janet M. Allen,et al.  Manual closed-loop insulin delivery in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a phase 2 randomised crossover trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[3]  Andrea Tura Advances in the development of devices for noninvasive glycemia monitoring: who will win the race , 2012 .

[4]  Howard Zisser,et al.  Improvement in glycemic excursions with a transcutaneous, real-time continuous glucose sensor: a randomized controlled trial. , 2006, Diabetes care.

[5]  M. Dwass Modified Randomization Tests for Nonparametric Hypotheses , 1957 .

[6]  Jorge Bondia,et al.  A multiple local models approach to accuracy improvement in continuous glucose monitoring. , 2012, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[7]  Josep Vehí,et al.  Comparison of interval and Monte Carlo simulation for the prediction of postprandial glucose under uncertainty in type 1 diabetes mellitus , 2011, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[8]  Giovanni Sparacino,et al.  A dynamic risk measure from continuous glucose monitoring data. , 2011, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[9]  A. Rollett,et al.  The Monte Carlo Method , 2004 .

[10]  S. K. Vashist Non-invasive glucose monitoring technology in diabetes management: a review. , 2012, Analytica chimica acta.

[11]  Giovanni Sparacino,et al.  “Smart” Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors: On-Line Signal Processing Issues , 2010, Sensors.

[12]  Josep Vehí,et al.  Estimating Plasma Glucose from Interstitial Glucose: The Issue of Calibration Algorithms in Commercial Continuous Glucose Monitoring Devices , 2010, Sensors.

[13]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[14]  Steven J. Russell,et al.  A Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Three Continuous Glucose Monitors , 2013, Diabetes Care.

[15]  J. Shaw,et al.  Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. , 2010, Diabetes research and clinical practice.

[16]  I. Harman-boehm,et al.  Noninvasive Glucose Monitoring: Increasing Accuracy by Combination of Multi-Technology and Multi-Sensors , 2010, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[17]  S. Grimnes,et al.  A study on electrode gels for skin conductance measurements , 2010, Physiological measurement.

[18]  Lutz Heinemann,et al.  Non-invasive glucose monitoring in patients with Type 1 diabetes: a Multisensor system combining sensors for dielectric and optical characterisation of skin. , 2009, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[19]  R. Esenaliev,et al.  Noninvasive blood glucose monitoring with optical coherence tomography: a pilot study in human subjects. , 2002, Diabetes care.

[20]  Peter Diem,et al.  Influence of time point of calibration on accuracy of continuous glucose monitoring in individuals with type 1 diabetes. , 2012, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[21]  Pavel Zakharov,et al.  Characteristics of a multisensor system for non invasive glucose monitoring with external validation and prospective evaluation. , 2011, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[22]  Sergei V. Pereverzyev,et al.  A meta-learning approach to the regularized learning - Case study: Blood glucose prediction , 2012, Neural Networks.

[23]  G. W. Small,et al.  Noninvasive glucose sensing. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[24]  C. Cobelli,et al.  Reduction of number and duration of hypoglycemic events by glucose prediction methods: a proof-of-concept in silico study. , 2013, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[25]  H. S. Wolff,et al.  iRun: Horizontal and Vertical Shape of a Region-Based Graph Compression , 2022, Sensors.

[26]  C. Cobelli,et al.  Real-Time Improvement of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Accuracy , 2013, Diabetes Care.

[27]  William L Clarke,et al.  Modeling of Calibration Effectiveness and Blood-to-Interstitial Glucose Dynamics as Potential Confounders of the Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Sensors during Hyperinsulinemic Clamp , 2007, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[28]  Giovanni Sparacino,et al.  Online Denoising Method to Handle Intraindividual Variability of Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Continuous Glucose Monitoring , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  J Geoffrey Chase,et al.  Using Stochastic modelling to identify unusual continuous glucose monitor measurements and behaviour, in newborn infants , 2012, Biomedical engineering online.

[30]  G. Rastelli,et al.  Diabetes complications and their potential prevention: Aldose reductase inhibition and other approaches , 1999, Medicinal research reviews.

[31]  Bernhard Wolf,et al.  Multiparameter techniques for non-invasive measurement of blood glucose , 2009 .

[32]  Pavel Zakharov,et al.  Cutaneous blood perfusion as a perturbing factor for noninvasive glucose monitoring. , 2010, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[33]  Giovanni Sparacino,et al.  Non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring: improved accuracy of point and trend estimates of the Multisensor system , 2012, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[34]  Giuseppe De Nicolao,et al.  Enhancing the Accuracy of Subcutaneous Glucose Sensors: A Real-Time Deconvolution-Based Approach , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[35]  Giovanni Sparacino,et al.  Italian Contributions to the Development of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Sensors for Diabetes Management , 2012, Sensors.

[36]  Tadej Battelino,et al.  Clinical use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring. , 2008, Current diabetes reviews.

[37]  Geoffrey M. Shaw,et al.  Hypoglycemia Detection in Critical Care Using Continuous Glucose Monitors: An in Silico Proof of Concept Analysis , 2010, Journal of diabetes science and technology.