Adaptation to spiral motion: global but not local motion detectors are modulated by attention

In this study, we investigated the effect of attention on local motion detectors. For this purpose we used logarithmic spirals previously used by Cavanagh and Favreau [Perception, 1980, 9(2), 175-182]. While the adapting stimulus was a rotating logarithmic spiral, the test stimulus was either the same spiral or its mirror image. When superimposed, all contours of the spiral stimulus and its mirror image are 90 degrees apart. Presenting the same spiral during the test period shows adaptation of both local motion detectors and global rotation detectors, whereas showing the mirror-spiral stimulates another set of local motion detectors, and therefore illustrates adaptation at only the global motion level. To manipulate the attentional state of observers, a secondary task was presented during the adaptation phase and observers either performed the task or ignored it. Motion aftereffect (MAE) duration was measured afterwards. While the effects of attention and test stimulus type on MAE duration were both significant, the difference in the MAE strength between the attention-distracted and attention-not-distracted conditions was equal when the test stimulus was the same-spiral or the mirror-spiral, suggesting that attention to spiral motion modulates only global rotation units and does not affect local motion detectors located at V1. Our results are in accord with those reported by Watanabe et al. [Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 1998, 95(19), 11489-11492] which showed differential modulation of motion processing areas depending on the type of motion being attended. Therefore our data are supportive of the notion that attentional modulation of V1 is highly task-dependent.

[1]  D. Somers,et al.  Functional MRI reveals spatially specific attentional modulation in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  P. Schiller,et al.  Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. II. Orientation specificity and ocular dominance. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[4]  Charles G. Gross,et al.  Pattern recognition mechanisms , 1985 .

[5]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The orientation specificity of two visual after‐effects , 1971, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The functional anatomy of attention to visual motion. A functional MRI study. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  S. Nishida,et al.  Contrast Dependencies of Two Types of Motion Aftereffect , 1997, Vision Research.

[8]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Underlying mechanisms of the response specificity of expansion/contraction and rotation cells in the dorsal part of the medial superior temporal area of the macaque monkey. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  P Cavanagh,et al.  Motion Aftereffect: A Global Mechanism for the Perception of Rotation , 1980, Perception.

[10]  C D Frith,et al.  Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. , 1997, Science.

[11]  D. Heeger,et al.  Motion Opponency in Visual Cortex , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  E. Seidemann,et al.  Effect of spatial attention on the responses of area MT neurons. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  Alexander M. Harner,et al.  Task-dependent influences of attention on the activation of human primary visual cortex. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  R. Ivry,et al.  Dissociation of short- and long-range apparent motion in visual search. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  J. Movshon,et al.  Selectivity for orientation and direction of motion of single neurons in cat striate and extrastriate visual cortex. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  S Ullman,et al.  Parallel and serial processes in motion detection. , 1987, Science.

[17]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Effects of Attention on the Processing of Motion in Macaque Middle Temporal and Medial Superior Temporal Visual Cortical Areas , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  D. Heeger,et al.  Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  P Cavanagh,et al.  Attention-based motion perception. , 1992, Science.

[20]  Selective activation of human cortical area V5A by a rotating visual stimulus in fMRI; implication of attentional mechanisms , 1998, Neuroreport.

[21]  F. Campbell,et al.  Orientational selectivity of the human visual system , 1966, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST , 1996, Nature.

[23]  Jon Driver,et al.  Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel , 1988, Nature.

[24]  A. Chaudhuri.  Modulation of the motion aftereffect by selective attention , 1990, Nature.

[25]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[26]  A. Pantle,et al.  Motion aftereffect as a function of the contrast of sinusoidal gratings , 1976, Vision Research.

[27]  D. Burr,et al.  Two stages of visual processing for radial and circular motion , 1995, Nature.

[28]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Cortical fMRI activation produced by attentive tracking of moving targets. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[29]  D. Heeger,et al.  Task-related modulation of visual cortex. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  D. Burr,et al.  A cortical area that responds specifically to optic flow, revealed by fMRI , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  A. Treisman,et al.  Voluntary Attention Modulates fMRI Activity in Human MT–MST , 1997, Neuron.

[32]  E. Adelson,et al.  The analysis of moving visual patterns , 1985 .