The Impact of a Social Robot's Attributions for Success and Failure in a Teachable Agent Framework

Teachable agents foster student learning by employing the learning by teaching paradigm. Since social factors influence learning from this paradigm, understanding which social behaviors a teachable agent should embody is an important first step for designing such an agent. Here, we focus on the impact of causal attributions made by a teachable agent. To obtain data on student perceptions of agent attributions, we conducted a study involving students interacting with a social robot that made attributions to ability and effort, and to the student, itself, or both. We analyzed data from semi-structured interviews to understand how different attributions influence student perceptions, and discuss design opportunities for manipulating these attributions to improve student motivation.

[1]  J J Murray,et al.  Learning outcomes , 2004, British Dental Journal.

[2]  F. Reif,et al.  Teaching scientific thinking skills: Students and computers coaching each other , 1999 .

[3]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Expressive robots in education: varying the degree of social supportive behavior of a robotic tutor , 2010, CHI.

[4]  Kasia Muldner,et al.  The Effect of Motivational Learning Companions on Low Achieving Students and Students with Disabilities , 2010, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[5]  Shlomo Hareli,et al.  Social Emotions and Personality Inferences: A Scaffold for a New Direction in the Study of Achievement Motivation , 2002 .

[6]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  LEARNING BY TEACHING: A NEW AGENT PARADIGM FOR EDUCATIONAL SOFTWARE , 2005, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[7]  Rod D. Roscoe,et al.  Understanding Tutor Learning: Knowledge-Building and Knowledge-Telling in Peer Tutors’ Explanations and Questions , 2007 .

[8]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Critic, compatriot, or chump?: Responses to robot blame attribution , 2010, 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[9]  Annika Silvervarg,et al.  Extending a Teachable Agent with a Social Conversation Module - Effects on Student Experiences and Learning , 2011, AIED.

[10]  Gautam Biswas,et al.  Designing Learning by Teaching Agents: The Betty's Brain System , 2008, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[11]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Children learning with a social robot , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[12]  F. Försterling,et al.  Attributional retraining: a review. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[13]  Kasia Muldner,et al.  Designing a Tangible Learning Environment with a Teachable Agent , 2013, AIED.

[14]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Teachable Agents and the Protégé Effect: Increasing the Effort Towards Learning , 2009 .

[15]  Amy Ogan,et al.  Rudeness and Rapport: Insults and Learning Gains in Peer Tutoring , 2012, ITS.

[16]  Soyoung Kim,et al.  The Effects of Agent Nonverbal Communication on Procedural and Attitudinal Learning Outcomes , 2008, IVA.

[17]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Active-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[18]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[19]  Amy Ogan,et al.  "Oh dear stacy!": social interaction, elaboration, and learning with teachable agents , 2012, CHI.