A design framework for educational hypermedia systems: theory, research, and learning emerging scientific conceptual perspectives

This paper focuses on theory and research issues associated with the use of hypermedia technologies in education. It is proposed that viewing hypermedia technologies as an enabling infrastructure for tools to support learning—in particular learning in problem-based pedagogical environments involving cases—has particular promise. After considering research issues with problem-based learning related to knowledge transfer and conceptual change, a design framework is discussed for a hypermedia system with scaffolding features intended to support and enhance problem-based learning with cases. Preliminary results are reported of research involving a new version of this hypermedia design approach with special ontological scaffolding to explore conceptual change and far knowledge transfer issues related to learning advanced scientific knowledge involving complex systems as well as the use of the system in a graduate seminar class. Overall, it is hoped that this program of research will stimulate further work on learning and cognitive sciences theoretical and research issues, on the characteristics of design features for robust and educationally powerful hypermedia systems, on ways that hypermedia systems might be used to support innovative pedagogical approaches being used in the schools, and on how particular designs for learning technologies might foster learning of conceptually difficult knowledge and skills that are increasingly necessary in the 21st century.

[1]  A. diSessa.  Toward an Epistemology of Physics , 1993 .

[2]  D. Gentner,et al.  Avoiding Missed Opportunities in Managerial Life: Analogical Training More Powerful Than Individual Case Training , 2000 .

[3]  T. Kuhn.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[4]  Naomi Miyake,et al.  Explorations of Scaffolding in Complex Classroom Systems , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[5]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[6]  Michael J. Jacobson,et al.  Issues in hypertext and hypermedia research: toward a framework for linking theory-to-design , 1994 .

[7]  D. Gentner.  Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy* , 1983 .

[8]  Michael J. Jacobson,et al.  Cognitive visualisations and the design of learning technologies , 2004, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[9]  Cindy E. Hmelo,et al.  Problem-Based Learning: Effects on the Early Acquisition of Cognitive Skill in Medicine , 1998 .

[10]  Susan M. Williams,et al.  Putting Case-Based Instruction Into Context: Examples From Legal and Medical Education , 1992 .

[11]  Paul Horwitz,et al.  ‘‘Relativity readiness’’ using the RelLab program , 1994 .

[12]  Michael J. Jacobson,et al.  Hypertext Learning Environments, Cognitive Flexibility, and the Transfer of Complex Knowledge: an Empirical Investigation Center for the Study of Reading Center for the Study of Reading Hypertext Learning Environments, Cognitive Flexibility, and the Transfer of Complex Knowledge: an Empirical Invest , 2007 .

[13]  Min Liu,et al.  The Effects of Modeling Expert Cognitive Strategies during Problem-Based Learning , 2002 .

[14]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[15]  S. Cormier,et al.  Transfer of learning: Contemporary research and applications. , 1987 .

[16]  Michael J. Jacobson,et al.  Learning with hypertext learning environments: theory, design, and research , 1995 .

[17]  Ok-choon Park,et al.  Hypermedia: functional features and research issues , 1991 .

[18]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3rd Edition , 2012 .

[19]  Dorothea P. Simon,et al.  Expert and Novice Performance in Solving Physics Problems , 1980, Science.

[20]  Daniel C. Moos,et al.  Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? , 2008 .

[21]  W. Brewer,et al.  Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Sigmar-Olaf Tergan,et al.  Conceptual and Methodological Shortcomings in Hypertext/Hypermedia Design and Research , 1997 .

[23]  M. Albanese,et al.  Problem‐based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes and Implementation Issues , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[24]  D. Gentner,et al.  Learning and Transfer: A General Role for Analogical Encoding , 2003 .

[25]  C. Hmelo‐Silver.  Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? , 2004 .

[26]  T. Kuhn.  The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. , 1996 .

[27]  N. Chater,et al.  Proceedings of the fourteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society , 1992 .

[28]  H S Barrows,et al.  A taxonomy of problem‐based learning methods , 1986, Medical education.

[29]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  Mental Models of the Day/Night Cycle , 1994, Cogn. Sci..

[30]  D. Wood,et al.  Problem based learning , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[31]  MICHAEL J. JACOBSON,et al.  Problem solving, cognition, and complex systems: Differences between experts and novices , 2001, Complex..

[32]  David E. Brown,et al.  Overcoming misconceptions via analogical reasoning: abstract transfer versus explanatory model construction , 1989 .

[33]  Charles W. Anderson,et al.  Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution , 1986 .

[34]  Kenneth A. Strike,et al.  A revisionist theory of conceptual change , 1992 .

[35]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  The cognitive basis of knowledge transfer. , 1987 .

[36]  A. Ortony,et al.  Similarity and Analogical Reasoning , 1991 .

[37]  Alfred North Whitehead.  The Aims of Education and Other Essays , 1967 .

[38]  Bruce K. Britton,et al.  Executive Control Processes in Reading , 1987 .

[39]  Robert Kozma,et al.  Innovations in Science and Mathematics Education: Advanced Designs for Technologies of Learning. , 2000 .

[40]  Mitchell J. Nathan,et al.  Less Can Be More: Unintelligent Tutoring Based on Psychological Theories and Experimentation , 1994 .

[41]  Anthi Archodidou,et al.  Evolution, hypermedia learning environments, and conceptual change: a preliminary report , 1996 .

[42]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  Commonsense Conceptions of Emergent Processes: Why Some Misconceptions Are Robust , 2005 .

[43]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  The design of Goal-Based Scenarios , 1994 .

[44]  William F. Brewer,et al.  The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction , 1993 .

[45]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[46]  Rand J. Spiro,et al.  Cognitive flexibility theory : advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains , 1988 .

[47]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[48]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Constructivism: Implications for the Design and Delivery of Instruction , 1996 .

[49]  Allan Collins,et al.  Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues , 2004 .

[50]  J. Roschelle,et al.  Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition , 1994 .

[51]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implica-tions , 1999 .

[52]  D. T. Vernon,et al.  Does problem‐based learning work? A meta‐analysis of evaluative research , 1993, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[53]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? q , 2004 .

[54]  R. Azevedo.  Using Hypermedia as a Metacognitive Tool for Enhancing Student Learning? The Role of Self-Regulated Learning , 2005 .

[55]  Elizabeth S. Charles,et al.  Developing a conceptual framework to explain emergent causality: Overcoming ontological beliefs to achieve conceptual change , 2004 .

[56]  M. Shand,et al.  Sign-based short-term coding of American Sign Language signs and printed English words by congenitally deaf signers , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[57]  A. Dillon,et al.  Hypermedia as an Educational Technology: A Review of the Quantitative Research Literature on Learner Comprehension, Control, and Style , 1998 .

[58]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[59]  Manu Kapur.  Productive Failure , 2006, ICLS.

[60]  Michael J. Jacobson,et al.  The Design of Hypermedia Tools for Learning: Fostering Conceptual Change and Transfer of Complex Scientific Knowledge , 2000 .

[61]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  The Social and Technological Dimensions of Scaffolding and Related Theoretical Concepts for Learning, Education, and Human Activity , 2004, The Journal of the Learning Sciences.

[62]  Michael J. Jacobson,et al.  From Non-Adaptive to Adaptive Educational Hypermedia: Theory, Research, and Methodological Issues , 2006 .

[63]  N. Cole.  Conceptions of Educational Achievement , 1990 .

[64]  Robert L. Goldstone.  The Complex Systems See-Change in Education , 2006 .

[65]  Reinout W. Wiers,et al.  Children's thoughts on the origin of species: A study of explanatory coherence , 1997 .

[66]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  International Perspectives on the Design of Technology-supported Learning Environments , 1996 .

[67]  Wim H. Gijselaers,et al.  Bringing Problem-Based Learning To Higher Education: Theory And Practice , 1996 .

[68]  Herbert A Simon,et al.  The understanding process: Problem isomorphs , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[69]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Schema induction and analogical transfer , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[70]  S. Vosniadou.  Mental Models in Conceptual Development , 2002 .

[71]  Amy M. Shapiro,et al.  LEARNING FROM HYPERTEXT: RESEARCH ISSUES AND FINDINGS , 2004 .

[72]  Janet L. Kolodner,et al.  Case-Based Reasoning , 1989, IJCAI 1989.

[73]  Roger Azevedo,et al.  Why Is Externally-Regulated Learning More Effective Than Self-Regulated Learning with Hypermedia? , 2005, AIED.

[74]  Joke Voogt,et al.  Technology, innovation, and educational change : a global perspective : a report of the Second Information Technology in Education Study, Module 2 , 2003 .

[75]  Rinat B. Rosenberg-Kima,et al.  Interface Agents to Alleviate Online Frustration , 2006, ICLS.

[76]  M. Chi,et al.  The Nature of Expertise , 1988 .

[77]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Mechanisms of Analogical Learning. , 1987 .

[78]  Yanghee Kim,et al.  Simulating Instructional Roles through Pedagogical Agents , 2005, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ..

[79]  R. Kozma,et al.  The Roles of Representations and Tools in the Chemistry Laboratory and Their Implications for Chemistry Learning , 2000 .

[80]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Analogical problem solving , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[81]  George D. Magoulas,et al.  Advances in Web-based Education: Personalized Learning Environments , 2005 .

[82]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Technology-Based Learning Environments , 1994, NATO ASI Series.

[83]  Walter P. Vispoel,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition for Application: Cognitive Flexibility and Transfer in Complex Content Domains. Technical Report No. 409. , 1987 .

[84]  John J. Clement,et al.  The Role of Extreme Case Reasoning in Instruction for Conceptual Change , 1997 .

[85]  D. Hestenes,et al.  A mechanics baseline test , 1992 .

[86]  H. Barrows.  Problem‐based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview , 1996 .

[87]  M. Chi,et al.  From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts , 1994 .

[88]  U. Wilensky,et al.  Complex Systems in Education: Scientific and Educational Importance and Implications for the Learning Sciences , 2006 .