Feminist Living Labs as Research Infrastructures for HCI: The Case of a Video Game Company

The number of women in IT is still low and companies struggle to integrate female professionals. The aim of our research is to provide methodological support for understanding and sharing experiences of gendered practices in the IT industry and encouraging sustained reflection about these matters over time. We established a Living Lab with that end in view, aiming to enhance female participation in the IT workforce and committing ourselves to a participatory approach to the sharing of women's experiences. Here, using the case of a German video game company which participated in our Lab, we detail our lessons learned. We show that this kind of long-term participation involves challenges over the lifetime of the project but can lead to substantial benefits for organizations. Our findings demonstrate that Living Labs are suitable for giving voice to marginalized groups, addressing their concerns and evoking change possibilities. Nevertheless, uncertainties about long-term sustainability remain.

[1]  Laurie Cohen,et al.  Spaces that Matter: Gender Performativity and Organizational Space , 2010 .

[2]  Martyn Hammersley,et al.  Educational Research and Evidence-based Practice , 2007 .

[3]  Lauren Alfrey,et al.  Gender-Fluid Geek Girls , 2017 .

[4]  Volker Wulf,et al.  "We want to push the industry via communication"... Designing Communication Measures to Foster Gender Diversity in a Video Game Company , 2020, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  I. Wagner.  Critical Reflections on Participation in Design , 2018 .

[6]  Timo Jakobi,et al.  PRAXLABS : A sustainable framework for user-centered ICT development Cultivating research experiences from Living Labs in the home ( , 2018 .

[7]  Barbara Czarniawska.  A Narrative Approach to Organization Studies , 1998 .

[8]  Martyn Hammersley,et al.  Action research: a contradiction in terms? , 2004 .

[9]  B. Gatenby,et al.  FEMINIST PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH: METHODOLOGICAL AND ETHICAL ISSUES , 2000 .

[10]  Marie-Josée Legault,et al.  Women’s Experiences on the Path to a Career in Game Development , 2018 .

[11]  Nicola Marsden,et al.  Personas and Identity: Looking at Multiple Identities to Inform the Construction of Personas , 2019, CHI.

[12]  R. Edwards,et al.  Ethics and feminist research: theory and practice , 2012 .

[13]  Ann Light,et al.  Queer(ing) HCI: Moving Forward in Theory and Practice , 2019, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[14]  Michelle K. Bothwell,et al.  STEM Women Faculty Struggling for Recognition and Advancement in a “Men’s Club” Culture , 2018 .

[15]  M. Edwards-Schachter,et al.  Fostering quality of life through social innovation: a living lab methodology study case , 2012 .

[16]  Seonaidh McDonald,et al.  Studying actions in context: a qualitative shadowing method for organizational research , 2005 .

[17]  C. Farquhar,et al.  Are focus groups suitable for 'sensitive' topics? , 1999 .

[18]  P. Maguire,et al.  The `f' word has everything to do with it , 2009 .

[19]  Nicola Marsden.  Doing gender in input fields , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[20]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Scandinavian Design: On Participation and Skill , 1992, Usability - Turning Technologies into Tools.

[21]  Angelo Corallo,et al.  Methodology for User-Centered Innovation in Industrial Living Lab , 2013 .

[22]  H. Bradbury,et al.  Handbook of action research : participative inquiry and practice , 2001 .

[23]  Jennifer Ann Rode,et al.  A theoretical agenda for feminist HCI , 2011, Interact. Comput..

[24]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI , 2011, CHI.

[25]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Utopias of participation: design, criticality, and emancipation , 2014, PDC '14.

[26]  Stefan Klein,et al.  Introduction to the Living Lab Approach , 2011, Accelerating Global Supply Chains with IT-Innovation.

[27]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Implications for design , 2006, CHI.

[28]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  Leaving the wild: lessons from community technology handovers , 2013, CHI.

[29]  James A. Holstein,et al.  Institutional Ethnography: Using Interviews to Investigate Ruling Relations , 2003 .

[30]  F. Baum,et al.  Participatory action research , 2006, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[31]  Anna Ståhlbröst,et al.  Reflecting on Actions in Living Lab Research , 2017 .

[32]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design , 2010, CHI.

[33]  A. Bruckman,et al.  An Archive of Their Own: A Case Study of Feminist HCI and Values in Design , 2016, CHI.

[34]  Margaret Burnett,et al.  From Gender Biases to Gender-Inclusive Design: An Empirical Investigation , 2019, CHI.

[35]  Joan Acker,et al.  Objectivity and truth: Problems in doing feminist research☆ , 1983 .

[36]  Konstantin Aal,et al.  Challenges and lessons learned by applying living labs in gender and IT contexts , 2018, GenderIT.

[37]  Anna Ståhlbröst.  A Living Lab as a Service: Creating Value for Micro-enterprises through Collaboration and Innovation , 2013 .

[38]  Volker Wulf,et al.  At Home with Users: A Comparative View of Living Labs , 2015, Interact. Comput..

[39]  Dimitri Schuurman,et al.  An exploration of user motivations for participation in living labs , 2014 .

[40]  Tone Bratteteig.  Bringing Gender Issues to Technology Design , 2002 .

[41]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Hacking Masculine Cultures - Career Ambitions of Female Young Professionals in a Video Game Company , 2019, CHI PLAY.

[42]  Joan Acker,et al.  Inequality Regimes , 2006 .

[43]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Retaining Women in Technology , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC).

[44]  Jan Bogg,et al.  Segregation in a Male-Dominated Industry: Women Working in the Computer Games Industry , 2011 .

[45]  Elizabeth L. Rose,et al.  Workforce motivation in Japan: an examination of gender differences and management perceptions , 2009 .

[46]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Designing for the living room: long-term user involvement in a living lab , 2013, CHI.

[47]  Javier García Guzmán,et al.  An Action Research Approach to Rural Living Labs Innovation , 2008 .

[48]  Barbara Simpson,et al.  Shadowing research in organizations: the methodological debates , 2014 .

[49]  Marla H. Kohlman,et al.  Intersectionality: A Transformative Paradigm in Feminist Theory and Social Justice , 2012 .

[50]  T. Cain.  The Sage handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice , 2014 .

[51]  Ian Alexander,et al.  Handbook of Action Research Participative Inquiry and Practice , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[52]  James A. Landay,et al.  Gender-Inclusive Design: Sense of Belonging and Bias in Web Interfaces , 2018, CHI.

[53]  Donna Harawy.  Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective , 2022, Philosophical Literary Journal Logos.

[54]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Research on research: design research at the margins: academia, industry and end-users , 2014, CHI.

[55]  Mika Westerlund,et al.  Towards innovation in Living Labs networks , 2012 .

[56]  C. Herring.  Does Diversity Pay?: Race, Gender, and the Business Case for Diversity , 2009 .

[57]  Peter C. Wright,et al.  Empathy and experience in HCI , 2008, CHI.

[58]  Carla Simone,et al.  Designing for Sustainability: Key Issues of ICT Projects for Ageing at Home , 2018, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[59]  D. Smith.  Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People , 2005 .

[60]  M. Pimbert,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Action Research , 2008 .

[61]  Nancy A. Van House,et al.  Feminist HCI meets facebook: Performativity and social networking sites , 2011, Interacting with computers.

[62]  Lynette Kvasny,et al.  Recruitment is never enough: retention of women and minorities in the IT workplace , 2004, SIGMIS CPR '04.

[63]  Stefanie Beninger,et al.  Book Review: Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men , 2019, Journal of Macromarketing.

[64]  Alexis Hope,et al.  A Feminist HCI Approach to Designing Postpartum Technologies: "When I first saw a breast pump I was wondering if it was a joke" , 2016, CHI.

[65]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[66]  Nancy Wyatt,et al.  The Science Question in Feminism , 1990 .

[67]  Rhoda K. Unger,et al.  Feminist Methods in Social Research. , 1993 .

[68]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[69]  Konstantin Aal,et al.  Exploring the Potential of Exergames to affect the Social and Daily Life of People with Dementia and their Caregivers , 2018, CHI.

[70]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Measures and Tools for Supporting ICT Appropriation by Elderly and Non Tech-Savvy Persons in a Long-Term Perspective , 2015, ECSCW.

[71]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Engaging with practices: design case studies as a research framework in CSCW , 2011, CSCW.

[72]  V. Braun,et al.  Using thematic analysis in psychology , 2006 .

[73]  Kim Etherington,et al.  Becoming a Reflexive Researcher - Using Our Selves in Research , 2004 .

[74]  C. Dell’Era,et al.  Living Lab: A Methodology between User‐Centred Design and Participatory Design , 2014 .

[75]  Daniela Karin Rosner,et al.  Hacking Culture, Not Devices: Access and Recognition in Feminist Hackerspaces , 2015, CSCW.

[76]  R Campbell,et al.  Feminist Approaches to Social Science: Epistemological and Methodological Tenets , 2000, American journal of community psychology.

[77]  Fiona Dowling Næss,et al.  Narratives about Young Men and Masculinities in Organised Sport in Norway , 2001 .

[78]  Nancy Taber,et al.  Institutional ethnography, autoethnography, and narrative: an argument for incorporating multiple methodologies , 2010 .