Visual scenes and cortical neurons: what you see is what you get.

To even the casual observer, it cannot be doubted that animals are highly adapted to their environments. The long necks of giraffes help them to gather food from high in the trees and a cheetah’s speed helps it to capture prey. But over the last several years, studies of visual information processing have taken this sort of insight to levels that are not as inherently obvious. When we examine a visual scene, there are certain features that attract our attention, such as the face of a friend or an oncoming car. But to identify these objects, neural circuits in the visual system must extract relevant cues from the available visual information. For example, the outline of the oncoming car can be defined by the organization of oriented edges within the visual field. Information theory now is being used to define what cues are available within visual scenes. It is believed that neural circuits in the visual system should be adapted to take advantage of these cues (for review see refs. 1 and 2).

[1]  Tobias Bonhoeffer,et al.  Reverse occlusion leads to a precise restoration of orientation preference maps in visual cortex , 1994, Nature.

[2]  H. Hirsch,et al.  Physiological consequences for the cat's visual cortex of effectively restricting early visual experience with oriented contours. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  G. Orban,et al.  The influence of eccentricity on receptive field types and orientation selectivity in areas 17 and 18 of the cat , 1981, Brain Research.

[4]  G. F. Cooper,et al.  Development of the Brain depends on the Visual Environment , 1970, Nature.

[5]  M. Stryker,et al.  Development of Orientation Preference Maps in Ferret Primary Visual Cortex , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  D. Hocking,et al.  An adult-like pattern of ocular dominance columns in striate cortex of newborn monkeys prior to visual experience , 1996, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[7]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  The “independent components” of natural scenes are edge filters , 1997, Vision Research.

[8]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  H. Hirsch,et al.  Receptive-field properties of different classes of neurons in visual cortex of normal and dark-reared cats. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  M. Weliky,et al.  Disruption of orientation tuning visual cortex by artificially correlated neuronal activity , 1997, Nature.

[11]  David J. Field,et al.  Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: A strategy employed by V1? , 1997, Vision Research.

[12]  T. Wiesel Postnatal development of the visual cortex and the influence of environment , 1982, Nature.

[13]  Jeffrey A. Sloan,et al.  Spatial frequency analysis of the visual environment: Anisotropy and the carpentered environment hypothesis , 1978, Vision Research.

[14]  D. N. Spinelli,et al.  Visual Experience Modifies Distribution of Horizontally and Vertically Oriented Receptive Fields in Cats , 1970, Science.

[15]  M. Stryker,et al.  The role of visual experience in the development of columns in cat visual cortex. , 1998, Science.

[16]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  The effect of visual experience on the development of stimulus specificity by kitten cortical neurones , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[17]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  Tobias Bonhoeffer,et al.  Development of identical orientation maps for two eyes without common visual experience , 1996, Nature.

[19]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.

[20]  D. Hubel,et al.  RECEPTIVE FIELDS OF CELLS IN STRIATE CORTEX OF VERY YOUNG, VISUALLY INEXPERIENCED KITTENS. , 1963, Journal of neurophysiology.