Design of a Rehabilitation Exoskeleton with Impedance Control: First Experiments

In this paper, we disclose the design strategy, control design and preliminary works leading to the development of a post stroke gait rehabilitation exoskeleton. The strategy is established based on the conventional gait rehabilitation currently used in rehabilitation centers and defines the exoskeleton as an interface between the therapist and the patient. The final purpose of this interface is to complete the conventional rehabilitation by intensifying the work of the patient while relieving the physical burden on the therapist. As the conventional rehabilitation is based on successive exercises the control is designed to have several operating modes triggered depending on the currently processing exercise. A test bench was realised to evaluate quantitatively as well as qualitatively these operating modes. Preliminary results of quantitative experiments on the transparent operation mode are then presented. These results validate the control design and comfort us on our development method.

[1]  Andrea Parri,et al.  A light-weight active orthosis for hip movement assistance , 2015, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[2]  Dennis R. Louie,et al.  Powered robotic exoskeletons in post-stroke rehabilitation of gait: a scoping review , 2016, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[3]  Mehmet Emin Aktan,et al.  Hybrid impedance control of a robot manipulator for wrist and forearm rehabilitation: Performance analysis and clinical results ☆ , 2018 .

[4]  W. Liao,et al.  Knee exoskeletons for gait rehabilitation and human performance augmentation: A state-of-the-art , 2019, Mechanism and Machine Theory.

[5]  Paolo Bonato,et al.  Development of a “transparent operation mode” for a lower-limb exoskeleton designed for children with cerebral palsy , 2019, 2019 IEEE 16th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[6]  Robert Riener,et al.  Control strategies for active lower extremity prosthetics and orthotics: a review , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[7]  Soumya K Manna,et al.  Comparative study of actuation systems for portable upper limb exoskeletons. , 2018, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  ParriAndrea,et al.  A light-weight active orthosis for hip movement assistance , 2015 .

[9]  Jan Swevers,et al.  Optimal robot excitation and identification , 1997, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[10]  Jusuk Lee,et al.  Fully autonomous hip exoskeleton saves metabolic cost of walking , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[11]  Mukul Talaty,et al.  Powered Exoskeletons for Walking Assistance in Persons with Central Nervous System Injuries: A Narrative Review , 2017, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[12]  Maxime Gautier,et al.  A New Closed-Loop Output Error Method for Parameter Identification of Robot Dynamics , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[13]  S. Olney,et al.  Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part I: Characteristics , 1996 .

[14]  R. Riener,et al.  Towards more effective robotic gait training for stroke rehabilitation: a review , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[15]  Fares Alahdab,et al.  Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016 , 2019, The Lancet Neurology.

[16]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Hybrid impedance control of robotic manipulators , 1987, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.