An Interactive System for Computer-Aided Diagnosis of Breast Masses

Although mammography is the only clinically accepted imaging modality for screening the general population to detect breast cancer, interpreting mammograms is difficult with lower sensitivity and specificity. To provide radiologists “a visual aid” in interpreting mammograms, we developed and tested an interactive system for computer-aided detection and diagnosis (CAD) of mass-like cancers. Using this system, an observer can view CAD-cued mass regions depicted on one image and then query any suspicious regions (either cued or not cued by CAD). CAD scheme automatically segments the suspicious region or accepts manually defined region and computes a set of image features. Using content-based image retrieval (CBIR) algorithm, CAD searches for a set of reference images depicting “abnormalities” similar to the queried region. Based on image retrieval results and a decision algorithm, a classification score is assigned to the queried region. In this study, a reference database with 1,800 malignant mass regions and 1,800 benign and CAD-generated false-positive regions was used. A modified CBIR algorithm with a new function of stretching the attributes in the multi-dimensional space and decision scheme was optimized using a genetic algorithm. Using a leave-one-out testing method to classify suspicious mass regions, we compared the classification performance using two CBIR algorithms with either equally weighted or optimally stretched attributes. Using the modified CBIR algorithm, the area under receiver operating characteristic curve was significantly increased from 0.865 ± 0.006 to 0.897 ± 0.005 (p < 0.001). This study demonstrated the feasibility of developing an interactive CAD system with a large reference database and achieving improved performance.

[1]  Robert M. Nishikawa,et al.  Current status and future directions of computer-aided diagnosis in mammography , 2007, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[2]  D. Ikeda,et al.  Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. , 2001, Radiology.

[3]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States. , 2011, Radiology.

[4]  M. Yaffe,et al.  American Cancer Society Guidelines for Breast Screening with MRI as an Adjunct to Mammography , 2007 .

[5]  Priscilla J Slanetz,et al.  Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  B. Cady,et al.  The life‐sparing potential of mammographic screening , 2001, Cancer.

[7]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Content-based Retrieval of Mammograms Using Visual Features Related to Breast Density Patterns , 2007, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[8]  Lorenzo Strigini,et al.  Effects of incorrect computer-aided detection (CAD) output on human decision-making in mammography. , 2004, Academic radiology.

[9]  D. Kopans,et al.  Cumulative Probability of False-Positive Recall or Biopsy Recommendation After 10 Years of Screening Mammography: A Cohort Study , 2012 .

[10]  H. Müller,et al.  Informatics in radiology (infoRAD): benefits of content-based visual data access in radiology. , 2005, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[11]  Bin Zheng,et al.  Improving performance of content-based image retrieval schemes in searching for similar breast mass regions: an assessment , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Bin Zheng,et al.  Improving performance of computer-aided detection scheme by combining results from two machine learning classifiers. , 2009, Academic radiology.

[13]  Haifeng Xu,et al.  Content-based retrieval in picture archiving and communication systems , 2009, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[14]  Luisa P. Wallace,et al.  Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[15]  D. Evans,et al.  Assessing women at high risk of breast cancer: a review of risk assessment models. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  P. Taylor,et al.  Computer-aided detection in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Programme: prospective study. , 2005, Radiology.

[17]  I. Ellis,et al.  The positive predictive value of mammographic signs: a review of 425 non-palpable breast lesions. , 1996, Clinical radiology.

[18]  Ellen Warner,et al.  Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination , 2004, JAMA.

[19]  Robert M. Nishikawa,et al.  Intelligent CAD workstation for breast imaging using similarity to known lesions and multiple visual prompt aids , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[20]  Nikolas P. Galatsanos,et al.  A similarity learning approach to content-based image retrieval: application to digital mammography , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  R. Warren,et al.  Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS) , 2005, The Lancet.

[22]  David Gur,et al.  A method to improve visual similarity of breast masses for an interactive computer-aided diagnosis environment. , 2005, Medical physics.

[23]  David Gur,et al.  Actual versus intended use of CAD systems in the clinical environment , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[24]  B. Zheng,et al.  Assessment of performance improvement in content-based medical image retrieval schemes using fractal dimension. , 2009, Academic radiology.

[25]  K. Doi,et al.  Determination of subjective similarity for pairs of masses and pairs of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms: comparison of similarity ranking scores and absolute similarity ratings. , 2007, Medical physics.

[26]  Joan Leach,et al.  Expert heads a'rolling Melissa Leach Ian , 2005, The Lancet.

[27]  Rachel F Brem,et al.  Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Content-based retrieval and analysis of mammographic masses , 2005, J. Electronic Imaging.

[29]  David Gur,et al.  Computer-aided detection performance in mammographic examination of masses: assessment. , 2004, Radiology.

[30]  Rong Jin,et al.  A Boosting Framework for Visuality-Preserving Distance Metric Learning and Its Application to Medical Image Retrieval , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[31]  Sang-Cheol Park,et al.  Assessment of Performance and Reliability of Computer-Aided Detection Scheme Using Content-Based Image Retrieval Approach and Limited Reference Database , 2010, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[32]  Joann G Elmore,et al.  Reality check: perceived versus actual performance of community mammographers. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[33]  Jacek M Zurada,et al.  Decision optimization of case-based computer-aided decision systems using genetic algorithms with application to mammography , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  D. Wolverton,et al.  Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists. , 2002, Radiology.

[35]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2010 , 2010, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[36]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice. , 2011, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[37]  J. Meyerhardt,et al.  Adjuvant Treatment of Colorectal Cancer , 2007, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[38]  T. Freer,et al.  Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. , 2001, Radiology.

[39]  Claudia Mello-Thoms,et al.  Interactive computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses: computerized selection of visually similar image sets from a reference library. , 2007, Academic radiology.

[40]  Mahadev Satyanarayanan,et al.  Optimization of reference library used in content-based medical image retrieval scheme. , 2007, Medical physics.