Contextual Alignment of Cognitive and Neural Dynamics

Effective real-world communication requires the alignment of multiple individuals to a common perspective or mental framework. To study how this alignment occurs at the level of the brain, we measured BOLD response during fMRI while participants (n = 24) listened to a series of vignettes either in the presence or absence of a valid contextual cue. The valid contextual cue was necessary to understand the information in each vignette. We then examined where and to what extent the shared valid context led to greater intersubject similarity of neural processing. Regions of the default mode network including posterior cingulate cortex and medial pFC became more aligned when participants shared a valid contextual framework, whereas other regions, including primary sensory cortices, responded to the stimuli reliably regardless of contextual factors. Taken in conjunction with previous research, the present results suggest that default mode regions help the brain to organize incoming verbal information in the context of previous knowledge.

[1]  Andrew J. Patton,et al.  Correction to “Automatic Block-Length Selection for the Dependent Bootstrap” by D. Politis and H. White , 2009 .

[2]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[3]  T. Yu,et al.  Contextual Prerequisites for Understanding: An Investigation of Comprehension and Recall , 1992 .

[4]  E. Tulving,et al.  Hippocampal PET activations of memory encoding and retrieval: The HIPER model , 1998, Hippocampus.

[5]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Beyond the sentence given , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  Evelyn C. Ferstl,et al.  The role of coherence and cohesion in text comprehension: an event-related fMRI study. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[7]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Human Brain Language Areas Identified by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  Uri Hasson,et al.  Not Lost in Translation: Neural Responses Shared Across Languages , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  C. Ranganath,et al.  Two cortical systems for memory-guided behaviour , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Neural substrates of narrative comprehension and memory , 2008, NeuroImage.

[11]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[12]  Jason P. Mitchell Contributions of Functional Neuroimaging to the Study of Social Cognition , 2008 .

[13]  M. Bar Visual objects in context , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[14]  T. Shallice,et al.  Dual-Process Model in Semantic Priming: A Functional Imaging Perspective , 1999, NeuroImage.

[15]  Amos Storkey,et al.  18th Annual Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping , 2012 .

[16]  D. Heeger,et al.  Reliability of cortical activity during natural stimulation , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Context effects in sentence memory. , 1974 .

[18]  G. Hynd,et al.  Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in normal readers: bilateral activation with narrative text. , 1989, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[19]  C. Goodwin,et al.  Rethinking Context: An Introduction , 1992 .

[20]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Common Blood Flow Changes across Visual Tasks: II. Decreases in Cerebral Cortex , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  Istvan Molnar-Szakacs,et al.  Beyond superior temporal cortex: intersubject correlations in narrative speech comprehension. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  M. Kutas,et al.  Semantic integration in reading: engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  R. Malach,et al.  Intersubject Synchronization of Cortical Activity During Natural Vision , 2004, Science.

[24]  Jason P. Mitchell Social psychology as a natural kind , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  C. Honey,et al.  Topographic Mapping of a Hierarchy of Temporal Receptive Windows Using a Narrated Story , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[27]  R. Buckner,et al.  Evidence for the Default Network's Role in Spontaneous Cognition , 2010 .

[28]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Social cognitive neuroscience: a review of core processes. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[29]  Florian Th. Siebörger,et al.  Making sense of nonsense: An fMRI study of task induced inference processes during discourse comprehension , 2007, Brain Research.

[30]  S. Petersen,et al.  Neuroimaging studies of word reading. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall , 1972 .

[32]  Guinevere F. Eden,et al.  Meta-Analysis of the Functional Neuroanatomy of Single-Word Reading: Method and Validation , 2002, NeuroImage.

[33]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[34]  D. A. Robertson,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of the Cognitive Process of Mapping During Discourse Comprehension , 2000, Psychological science.

[35]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .

[36]  E. Maguire,et al.  The functional neuroanatomy of comprehension and memory: the importance of prior knowledge. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[37]  C. Frith,et al.  Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[38]  Evelyn C. Ferstl,et al.  The extended language network: A meta‐analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[39]  D. Heeger,et al.  A Hierarchy of Temporal Receptive Windows in Human Cortex , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Jiang Xu,et al.  Language in context: emergent features of word, sentence, and narrative comprehension , 2005, NeuroImage.

[41]  Uri Hasson,et al.  Shared and idiosyncratic cortical activation patterns in autism revealed under continuous real‐life viewing conditions , 2009, Autism research : official journal of the International Society for Autism Research.

[42]  Bernard Mazoyer,et al.  Meta-analyzing left hemisphere language areas: Phonology, semantics, and sentence processing , 2006, NeuroImage.

[43]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Brain's Default Network , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Juan Antonio Hernández Tamames,et al.  Brain activation in discourse comprehension: A 3t fMRI study , 2008, NeuroImage.

[45]  T A Carpenter,et al.  Colored noise and computational inference in neurophysiological (fMRI) time series analysis: Resampling methods in time and wavelet domains , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[46]  B. Averbeck,et al.  The primate cortical auditory system and neural representation of conspecific vocalizations. , 2009, Annual review of neuroscience.

[47]  S. Blumstein,et al.  An Event-Related fMRI Investigation of Implicit Semantic Priming , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  R. Buckner,et al.  Self-projection and the brain , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[49]  H. White,et al.  Automatic Block-Length Selection for the Dependent Bootstrap , 2004 .

[50]  R. Mar The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[51]  Christopher J. Honey,et al.  Loss of reliable temporal structure in event-related averaging of naturalistic stimuli , 2012, NeuroImage.

[52]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .