Quintessential Solutions to Existential Problems: How Human Factors and Ergonomics Can and Should Address the Imminent Challenges of Our Times.

OBJECTIVE To examine and evaluate ways in which an understanding of the quintessential element of Human Factors/Ergonomics can address the spectrum of existential threats that confront contemporary civilization. BACKGROUND HF/E is dedicated to improving quality of life. Paradoxically, many processes which sustain contemporary civilization act to reduce that overall quality. Some technological developments themselves now even present existential threats to the fragile skein of civilization itself. Many disciplines address these diverse threats, and each may be advised and facilitated by HF/E knowledge and methods. It is a moral imperative of our science to contribute what we can to proposed resolutions. METHOD A primary conduit, by the established strengths of HF/E can contribute to potential solutions is identified. The present work advocates for specific, practical interventions using a direct-perception mediated, panopticon principle, that derives from the corpus of our science. RESULT Limitations upon a general, social understanding of imminent global concerns, which are largely ignorable when not actually present, are brought to immediate consciousness via an HF/E principle emphasizing the direct-perception of threat. It is argued that this, and allied HF/E insights can generate practical steps toward problem resolution at both macroscopic and localized levels of implementation. APPLICATIONS The primary, practical application of the proposed panopticon principle is to use our science to save global civilization. It is postulated that this represents useful employment of the knowledge we have adduced and accumulated across our discipline's existence.

[1]  J. A,et al.  METAVERSE , 2023, International Journal of Innovative Research in Information Security.

[2]  K. Witte,et al.  Perception and Action under Different Stimulus Presentations: A Review of Eye-Tracking Studies with an Extended View on Possibilities of Virtual Reality , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[3]  A. D. Kaplan,et al.  How effective are warnings? A meta-analysis , 2020 .

[4]  P. Newman Hope in a time of civicide: regenerative development and IPAT , 2020, Sustainable Earth.

[5]  P. Hancock,et al.  Specifying and Mitigating Thermal Stress Effects on Cognition During Personal Protective Equipment Use , 2020, Hum. Factors.

[6]  P. Hancock,et al.  Quantifying the qualities of language , 2020, PloS one.

[7]  Stephen B Broomell,et al.  Global-Local Incompatibility: The Misperception of Reliability in Judgment Regarding Global Variables , 2020, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  P A Hancock,et al.  The Effects of Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Mixed Reality as Training Enhancement Methods: A Meta-Analysis , 2020, Hum. Factors.

[9]  P. Hancock,et al.  In Praise of Civicide , 2019, Sustainable Earth.

[10]  P A Hancock,et al.  The humane use of human beings? , 2019, Applied ergonomics.

[11]  P. Waterson,et al.  Human factors and ergonomics systems-based tools for understanding and addressing global problems of the twenty-first century , 2019, Ergonomics.

[12]  Patrick Waterson,et al.  State of Science: ergonomics and global issues , 2018, Ergonomics.

[13]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  On the Design of Time , 2018 .

[14]  A. Thatcher,et al.  Human factors for a sustainable future. , 2016, Applied ergonomics.

[15]  E. Phelps,et al.  Flashbulb Memories , 2016, Current directions in psychological science.

[16]  P A Hancock,et al.  The effects of display size on performance , 2015, Ergonomics.

[17]  A. Thatcher,et al.  Towards a sustainable world through human factors and ergonomics: it is all about values , 2014, Ergonomics.

[18]  Bence Nanay,et al.  Between Perception and Action , 2013 .

[19]  Peter A Hancock,et al.  Ergonomics and sustainability: towards an embrace of complexity and emergence , 2013, Ergonomics.

[20]  Nick Bostrom,et al.  Existential Risk Prevention as Global Priority , 2013 .

[21]  Ajey Lele,et al.  Virtual reality and its military utility , 2011, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing.

[22]  M. Desvaux The sustainability of human populations , 2007 .

[23]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Bilateral teleoperation: An historical survey , 2006, Autom..

[24]  J. Hansen,et al.  Global temperature change , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  K. Sweeney Personal knowledge , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  The Tale of a Two-Faced Tiger , 2005 .

[27]  Peter M. Wiemer-Hastings,et al.  Addiction to the Internet and Online Gaming , 2005, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[28]  Antony Trewavas,et al.  Malthus foiled again and again , 2002, Nature.

[29]  J. Randers,et al.  Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Neville Moray,et al.  Ergonomics and the global problems of the twenty-first century , 1995 .

[31]  J. E. Cohen,et al.  Population growth and earth's human carrying capacity. , 1995, Science.

[32]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  Transfer of training from virtual reality , 1993 .

[33]  P. Hancock,et al.  A Dynamic Model of Stress and Sustained Attention , 1989, Human factors.

[34]  Yan Feng,et al.  Air Pollution, Greenhouse Gases and Climate Change: Global and Regional Perspectives , 2009 .