Does the Design of a Robot Influence Its Animacy and Perceived Intelligence?

Robots exhibit life-like behavior by performing intelligent actions. To enhance human-robot interaction it is necessary to investigate and understand how end-users perceive such animate behavior. In this paper, we report an experiment to investigate how people perceived different designs of robot embodiments in terms of animacy and intelligence. iCat and Robovie II were used as the two embodiments in this experiment. We conducted a between-subject experiment where robot type was the independent variable, and perceived animacy and intelligence of the robot were the dependent variables. Our findings suggest that a robot’s perceived intelligence is significantly correlated with animacy. The correlation between the intelligence and the animacy of a robot was observed to be stronger in the case of the iCat embodiment. Our results also indicate that the more animated the face of the robot, the more likely it is to attract the attention of a user. We also discuss the possible and probable explanations of the results obtained.

[1]  D. Rakison,et al.  Developmental origin of the animate-inanimate distinction. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  Diane Poulin-Dubois,et al.  Infants' concept of animacy. , 1996 .

[3]  Xue Yan,et al.  iCat: an animated user-interface robot with personality , 2005, AAMAS '05.

[4]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Young Children's Understanding of Animacy and Entertainment Robots , 2006, Int. J. Humanoid Robotics.

[5]  Hayeon Song,et al.  Can a robot be perceived as a developing creature? Effects of a robot's long-term cognitive developments on its social presence and people's social responses toward it , 2005 .

[6]  H. McGurk,et al.  Hearing lips and seeing voices , 1976, Nature.

[7]  Frank E. Pollick,et al.  Perceiving Animacy And Arousal In Transformed Displays Of Human Interaction , 2004 .

[8]  P. Todd,et al.  How motion reveals intention: Categorizing social interactions , 1999 .

[9]  R. Warner,et al.  Attributions of Personality Based on Physical Appearance, Speech, and Handwriting , 1986 .

[10]  B. Webb.  What does robotics offer animal behaviour? , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[12]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  HRI caught on film , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[13]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Scientific Issues Concerning Androids , 2007, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[14]  Lee Sproull,et al.  My partner is a real dog: cooperation with social agents , 1996, CSCW '96.

[15]  Joseph Dumit,et al.  Cyborg babies : from techno-sex to techno-tots , 1998 .

[16]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Estimating Robot Induced Affective State using Hidden Markov Models , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[17]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[18]  J. Burger.  Obedience to Authority , 2011 .

[19]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  A Virtual Reprise of the Stanley Milgram Obedience Experiments , 2006, PloS one.

[20]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[21]  S. Gelman,et al.  Robots and rodents: children's inferences about living and nonliving kinds. , 2007, Child development.

[22]  D. McFarland,et al.  Artificial Ethology , 2001 .

[23]  F Mondada,et al.  Social Integration of Robots into Groups of Cockroaches to Control Self-Organized Choices , 2007, Science.

[24]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  All robots are not created equal: the design and perception of humanoid robot heads , 2002, DIS '02.

[25]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  “Daisy, daisy, give me your answer do!” switching off a robot , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[26]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perception of Animacy from the Motion of a Single Object , 2000, Perception.

[27]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Robots as dogs?: children's interactions with the robotic dog AIBO and a live australian shepherd , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[28]  P. Todd,et al.  Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .

[29]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perceptual causality and animacy , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[30]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Interacting with an embodied emotional character , 2003, DPPI '03.

[31]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  My robotic doppelgänger - a critical look at the Uncanny Valley , 2009, RO-MAN 2009 - The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[32]  Christian Heath,et al.  IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication , 2009 .

[33]  R. Sparrow.  The Turing Triage Test , 2004, Ethics and Information Technology.

[34]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  To kill a mockingbird robot , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[35]  A. D. Jones,et al.  Obedience to Authority , 1974 .

[36]  S. Kiesler,et al.  A prisoner's dilemma experiment on cooperation with people and human-like computers. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  F. Kaplan,et al.  Social behaviour of dogs encountering AIBO, an animal-like robot in a neutral and in a feeding situation , 2004, Behavioural Processes.

[38]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  What is a Human? - Toward Psychological Benchmarks in the Field of Human-Robot Interaction , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.