ZU-mean: fingerprinting based device localization methods for IoT in the presence of additive and multiplicative noise

This paper proposes Zero-Mean and Unity-Mean (ZU-Mean) features based device localization methods for internet of things (IoT). These features do not depend on the hardwares and/or specifications of the devices being used. Moreover, the zero-mean and unity-mean features mitigate the additive and multiplicative noise, respectively. Extensive real experiments are conducted in two different sites (residential and mall areas) using WiFi received signal strength (RSS) for five weeks. The performance of the proposed methods is better than the absolute RSS based method. We also highlight that the absolute RSS feature cannot be used in calibration-free method and hence, it is not suitable for diverse devices in IoT networks. Additionally, the proposed low-cost method is computationally efficient as compared to the existing methods in the literature.

[1]  Agathoniki Trigoni,et al.  Gaussian Process Regression for Fingerprinting based Localization , 2016, Ad Hoc Networks.

[2]  Antoni Pérez-Navarro,et al.  Influence of human absorption of Wi-Fi signal in indoor positioning with Wi-Fi fingerprinting , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN).

[3]  Moustafa Youssef,et al.  The Horus WLAN location determination system , 2005, MobiSys '05.

[4]  Fangfang Dong,et al.  A Calibration-Free Localization Solution for Handling Signal Strength Variance , 2009, MELT.

[5]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Image Processing and GIS for Remote Sensing: Techniques and Applications , 2016 .

[6]  Moustafa Youssef,et al.  No need to war-drive: unsupervised indoor localization , 2012, MobiSys '12.

[7]  Yunhao Liu,et al.  From RSSI to CSI , 2013, ACM Comput. Surv..

[8]  Mario Gerla,et al.  FreeLoc: Calibration-free crowdsourced indoor localization , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[9]  Shueng-Han Gary Chan,et al.  Wi-Fi Fingerprint-Based Indoor Positioning: Recent Advances and Comparisons , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[10]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[11]  Chau Yuen,et al.  Selective AP-Sequence Based Indoor Localization without Site Survey , 2016, 2016 IEEE 83rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[12]  Mikkel Baun Kjærgaard,et al.  Hyperbolic Location Fingerprinting: A Calibration-Free Solution for Handling Differences in Signal Strength (concise contribution) , 2008, 2008 Sixth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom).