A comparative life-cycle energy and emissions analysis for intercity passenger transportation in the U.S. by aviation, intercity bus, and automobile

Abstract Intercity passenger trips constitute a significant source of energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and criteria pollutant emissions. The most commonly used city-to-city modes in the United States include aircraft, intercity bus, and automobile. This study applies state-of-the-practice models to assess life-cycle fuel consumption and pollutant emissions for intercity trips via aircraft, intercity bus, and automobile. The analyses compare the fuel and emissions impacts of different travel mode scenarios for intercity trips ranging from 200 to 1600 km. Because these modes operate differently with respect to engine technology, fuel type, and vehicle capacity, the modeling techniques and modeling boundaries vary significantly across modes. For aviation systems, much of the energy and emissions are associated with auxiliary equipment activities, infrastructure power supply, and terminal activities, in addition to the vehicle operations between origin/destination. Furthermore, one should not ignore the embodied energy and initial emissions from the manufacturing of the vehicles, and the construction of airports, bus stations, highways and parking lots. Passenger loading factors and travel distances also significantly influence fuel and emissions results on a per-traveler basis. The results show intercity bus is generally the most fuel-efficient mode and produced the lowest per-passenger-trip emissions for the entire range of trip distances examined. Aviation is not a fuel-efficient mode for short trips (

[1]  R. Guensler,et al.  A Monte Carlo Technique for Assessing Motor Vehicle Emission Model Uncertainty , 1995 .

[2]  V. Filimonau,et al.  The carbon impact of short-haul tourism: a case study of UK travel to Southern France using life cycle analysis , 2014 .

[3]  Steven R H Barrett,et al.  Global mortality attributable to aircraft cruise emissions. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Nicole Adler,et al.  Aircraft trip cost parameters: A function of stage length and seat capacity , 2006 .

[5]  Lawrence W. Lan,et al.  Sustainable consumption, production and infrastructure construction for operating and planning intercity passenger transport systems , 2013 .

[6]  Troy R. Hawkins,et al.  Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles , 2013 .

[7]  Joseph P Schwieterman,et al.  Research Article: The Decline and Recovery of Intercity Bus Service in the United States: A Comeback for an Environmentally Friendly Transportation Mode? , 2011 .

[8]  Chris Hendrickson,et al.  Assessing the energy and greenhouse gas emissions mitigation effectiveness of potential US modal freight policies , 2012 .

[9]  John F. Frittelli,et al.  The Development of High Speed Rail in the United States: Issues and Recent Events , 2012 .

[10]  Sonja Haustein,et al.  Encouraging Environmentally Sustainable Holiday Travel , 2006 .

[11]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Environmental Assessment of Freight Transportation in the U.S. (11 pp) , 2006 .

[12]  Yanzhi Xu Effective GPS-based panel survey sample size for urban travel behavior studies , 2010 .

[13]  Constantine Samaras,et al.  Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from plug-in hybrid vehicles: implications for policy. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Stacy Cagle Davis,et al.  Transportation energy data book , 2008 .

[15]  Lee Chapman,et al.  Transport and climate change: a review , 2007 .

[16]  A. Horvath,et al.  Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains , 2009 .

[17]  Mikhail Chester Life-cycle Environmental Inventory of Passenger Transportation in the United States , 2008 .

[18]  Ian A. Waitz,et al.  The historical fuel efficiency characteristics of regional aircraft from technological, operational, and cost perspectives , 2002 .

[19]  R. Harrison,et al.  Civil aviation, air pollution and human health , 2015 .

[20]  M. Eckelman Life cycle assessment in support of sustainable transportation , 2013 .

[21]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Bias of averages in life-cycle footprinting of infrastructure: truck and bus case studies. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Aviation emissions and abatement policies in the United States: a city-pair analysis , 2004 .

[23]  Mikhail Chester,et al.  Vehicle Manufacturing Futures in Transportation Life-cycle Assessment , 2011 .

[24]  Tobias Kuhnimhof,et al.  Generating Internationally Comparable Figures on Long-Distance Travel for Europe , 2009 .

[25]  Lauren Ames Fischer,et al.  Competition from the Curb , 2012 .

[26]  A. Horvath,et al.  High-speed rail with emerging automobiles and aircraft can reduce environmental impacts in California’s future , 2012 .

[27]  Roger Kemp Short-haul aviation – under what conditions is it more environmentally benign than the alternatives? , 2009, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[28]  Descriptive Analysis of Long-Distance Travel by Personal Vehicles Using 2004 Commute Atlanta Data , 2007 .