Reconfigurable Transport Networks to Accommodate Much More Traffic Demand

Transport networks are being used to exchange traffic among communication sites. Current transport networks are mostly static, because existing traffic patterns do not fluctuate wildly. However, given that demand fluctuations are likely to become significant due to the emerging diversity of network services, current static networks will have great difficulty in accommodating all future demands. In this paper, we propose a network architecture that can accommodate more demands by employing fiber cross-connects (FXCs) connected with dark fibers; FXCs, e.g., robotic patch panels and micro-electromechanical system, are optical switches that perform circuit-switching on a per-fiber basis. Because the FXCs can satisfy demand changes by reconfiguring the physical network topology, it can accommodate greater demand variations than traditional fixed networks; this is confirmed by numerical simulations. The reconfigurable network is particularly effective when the network has many nodes with significant demand fluctuations; it accommodates up to 2.5 times more demand than the fixed equivalent.

[1]  Rajdeep Das,et al.  Expanding across time to deliver bandwidth efficiency and low latency , 2019, NSDI.

[2]  Robert Protzmann Large-scale Modeling of Future Automotive Data Traffic towards the Edge Cloud , 2019 .

[3]  Gal Shahaf,et al.  Beyond fat-trees without antennae, mirrors, and disco-balls , 2017, SIGCOMM.

[4]  Masahiko Jinno,et al.  Spatial channel network (SCN): Opportunities and challenges of introducing spatial bypass toward the massive SDM era [invited] , 2019, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[5]  A. Hirano,et al.  Wavelength path reconfiguration design in transparent optical WDM networks , 2013, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[6]  George N. Rouskas,et al.  On the physical and logical topology design of large-scale optical networks , 2003 .

[7]  Wei Xu,et al.  Optimizing Bulk Transfers with Software-Defined Optical WAN , 2016, SIGCOMM.

[8]  Himanshu Shah,et al.  FireFly , 2014, SIGCOMM.

[9]  Michal Stepanovsky,et al.  A Comparative Review of MEMS-Based Optical Cross-Connects for All-Optical Networks From the Past to the Present Day , 2019, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[10]  Masayuki Murata,et al.  Bayesian-based virtual network reconfiguration for dynamic optical networks , 2018, IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking.

[11]  Farhad Shahrokhi,et al.  The maximum concurrent flow problem , 1990, JACM.

[12]  Hiroshi Hasegawa,et al.  Dynamic Path Provisioning and Disruption-Free Reoptimization Algorithms for Bandwidth on-Demand Services Considering Fairness , 2017, IEICE Trans. Commun..

[13]  Nikhil R. Devanur,et al.  ProjecToR: Agile Reconfigurable Data Center Interconnect , 2016, SIGCOMM.

[14]  Stefan Schmid,et al.  Survey of Reconfigurable Data Center Networks: Enablers, Algorithms, Complexity , 2019, SIGA.

[15]  H. T. Mouftah,et al.  Energy-efficient design for multi-granular optical transport networks with optical reach consideration , 2014, Opt. Switch. Netw..

[16]  J. M. Simmons,et al.  Optical Network Design and Planning , 2008 .

[17]  Chunming Qiao,et al.  Waveband Switching for Dynamic Traffic Demands in Multigranular Optical Networks , 2007, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[18]  Biswanath Mukherjee,et al.  Wavelength-routed optical networks: linear formulation, resource budgeting tradeoffs, and a reconfiguration study , 2000, TNET.

[19]  Matthew Roughan,et al.  Internet Traffic Matrices: A Primer , 2013 .