A Lagrangian formulation for statistical fluid registration

We defined a new statistical fluid registration method with Lagrangian mechanics. Although several authors have suggested that empirical statistics on brain variation should be incorporated into the registration problem, few algorithms have included this information and instead use regularizers that guarantee diffeomorphic mappings. Here we combine the advantages of a large-deformation fluid matching approach with empirical statistics on population variability in anatomy. We reformulated the Riemannian fluid algorithmdeveloped in [4], and used a Lagrangian framework to incorporate 0th and 1st order statistics in the regularization process. 92 2D midline corpus callosum traces from a twin MRI database were fluidly registered using the non-statistical version of the algorithm (algorithm 0), giving initial vector fields and deformation tensors. Covariance matrices were computed for both distributions and incorporated either separately (algorithm 1 and algorithm 2) or together (algorithm 3) in the registration. We computed heritability maps and two vector and tensorbased distances to compare the power and the robustness of the algorithms.

[1]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[2]  Norbert Schuff,et al.  Optimizing power to track brain degeneration in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment with tensor-based morphometry: An ADNI study of 515 subjects , 2009, NeuroImage.

[3]  M. Miller Computational anatomy: shape, growth, and atrophy comparison via diffeomorphisms , 2004, NeuroImage.

[4]  Jens Frahm,et al.  Topography of the human corpus callosum revisited—Comprehensive fiber tractography using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging , 2006, NeuroImage.

[5]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  BrainSuite: An Automated Cortical Surface Identification Tool , 2000, MICCAI.

[6]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  3 D pattern of brain atrophy in HIV / AIDS visualized using tensor-based morphometry , 2006 .

[7]  James C. Gee,et al.  On matching brain volumes , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[8]  Michael Brady,et al.  Improved Optimization for the Robust and Accurate Linear Registration and Motion Correction of Brain Images , 2002, NeuroImage.

[9]  Ruzena Bajcsy,et al.  Multiresolution elastic matching , 1989, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[10]  N. Ayache,et al.  Log‐Euclidean metrics for fast and simple calculus on diffusion tensors , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  B. Ripley,et al.  Pattern Recognition , 1968, Nature.

[12]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Deformable templates using large deformation kinematics , 1996, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[13]  A. Karimi,et al.  Master‟s thesis , 2011 .

[14]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Statistically assisted fluid image registration algorithm - SAFIRA , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[15]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[16]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Genetic Contributions to Human Brain Morphology and Intelligence , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  U. Grenander,et al.  Computational anatomy: an emerging discipline , 1998 .