A Boolean Model of the Gene Regulatory Network Underlying Mammalian Cortical Area Development

The cerebral cortex is divided into many functionally distinct areas. The emergence of these areas during neural development is dependent on the expression patterns of several genes. Along the anterior-posterior axis, gradients of Fgf8, Emx2, Pax6, Coup-tfi, and Sp8 play a particularly strong role in specifying areal identity. However, our understanding of the regulatory interactions between these genes that lead to their confinement to particular spatial patterns is currently qualitative and incomplete. We therefore used a computational model of the interactions between these five genes to determine which interactions, and combinations of interactions, occur in networks that reproduce the anterior-posterior expression patterns observed experimentally. The model treats expression levels as Boolean, reflecting the qualitative nature of the expression data currently available. We simulated gene expression patterns created by all possible networks containing the five genes of interest. We found that only of these networks were able to reproduce the experimentally observed expression patterns. These networks all lacked certain interactions and combinations of interactions including auto-regulation and inductive loops. Many higher order combinations of interactions also never appeared in networks that satisfied our criteria for good performance. While there was remarkable diversity in the structure of the networks that perform well, an analysis of the probability of each interaction gave an indication of which interactions are most likely to be present in the gene network regulating cortical area development. We found that in general, repressive interactions are much more likely than inductive ones, but that mutually repressive loops are not critical for correct network functioning. Overall, our model illuminates the design principles of the gene network regulating cortical area development, and makes novel predictions that can be tested experimentally.

[1]  Luca Muzio,et al.  Area identity shifts in the early cerebral cortex of Emx2−/− mutant mice , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  Salvador Martinez,et al.  Midbrain development induced by FGF8 in the chick embryo , 1996, Nature.

[3]  Shen-Ju Chou,et al.  Area Patterning of the Mammalian Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[4]  Hidde de Jong,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of Genetic Regulatory Systems: A Literature Review , 2002, J. Comput. Biol..

[5]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Distinct Actions of Emx1, Emx2, andPax6 in Regulating the Specification of Areas in the Developing Neocortex , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Denis Thieffry,et al.  Dynamical modelling of pattern formation during embryonic development. , 2003, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[7]  M. Sur,et al.  Patterning and Plasticity of the Cerebral Cortex , 2005, Science.

[8]  M. Sur,et al.  Development and plasticity of cortical areas and networks , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  Anastassia Stoykova,et al.  Gene networks controlling early cerebral cortex arealization , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[10]  D. A. Baxter,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Gene Networks , 2000, Neuron.

[11]  Y. Lazebnik.  Can a biologist fix a radio? — or, what I learned while studying apoptosis , 2004, Biochemistry (Moscow).

[12]  U. Bhalla,et al.  Emergent properties of networks of biological signaling pathways. , 1999, Science.

[13]  Alvis Brazma,et al.  Current approaches to gene regulatory network modelling , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[14]  H. Bolouri.  Computational Modeling of Gene Regulatory Networks - A Primer , 2008 .

[15]  Stefan Krauss,et al.  COUP-TFI coordinates cortical patterning, neurogenesis, and laminar fate and modulates MAPK/ERK, AKT, and beta-catenin signaling. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  R. Laubenbacher,et al.  A computational algebra approach to the reverse engineering of gene regulatory networks. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  H. Kestler,et al.  Network modeling of signal transduction: establishing the global view , 2008, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[18]  C. Tomlin,et al.  Biology by numbers: mathematical modelling in developmental biology , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[19]  Seong-Seng Tan,et al.  Constructing the mammalian neocortex: the role of intrinsic factors. , 2003, Developmental biology.

[20]  Gord Fishell,et al.  The genetics of early telencephalon patterning: some assembly required , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  T. Henzinger,et al.  Executable cell biology , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[22]  Bard Ermentrout,et al.  Model of the Early Development of Thalamo-Cortical Connections and Area Patterning via Signaling Molecules , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[23]  E. Grove,et al.  Neocortex Patterning by the Secreted Signaling Molecule FGF8 , 2001, Science.

[24]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Regulation of area identity in the mammalian neocortex by Emx2 and Pax6. , 2000, Science.

[25]  Ahmed Mansouri,et al.  Genetic interplay between the transcription factors Sp8 and Emx2 in the patterning of the forebrain , 2007, Neural Development.

[26]  Zoltán Molnár,et al.  Altered Molecular Regionalization and Normal Thalamocortical Connections in Cortex-Specific Pax6 Knock-Out Mice , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  L Wolpert,et al.  One hundred years of positional information. , 1996, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[28]  L. Wolpert.  Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[29]  John D West,et al.  Controlled overexpression of Pax6 in vivo negatively autoregulates the Pax6 locus, causing cell-autonomous defects of late cortical progenitor proliferation with little effect on cortical arealization , 2006, Development.

[30]  Shen-Ju Chou,et al.  Cortical area size dictates performance at modality-specific behaviors , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  J. Rubenstein,et al.  Dosage of Fgf8 determines whether cell survival is positively or negatively regulated in the developing forebrain , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  Tadashi Hamasaki,et al.  EMX2 Regulates Sizes and Positioning of the Primary Sensory and Motor Areas in Neocortex by Direct Specification of Cortical Progenitors , 2004, Neuron.

[33]  Phil Husbands,et al.  Asynchronous Dynamics of an Artificial Genetic Regulatory Network , 2004 .

[34]  Hamid Bolouri,et al.  Embryonic pattern formation without morphogens. , 2008, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[35]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Genetic regulation of arealization of the neocortex , 2008, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[36]  Y. Ohkubo,et al.  Coordinate expression of Fgf8, Otx2, Bmp4, and Shh in the rostral prosencephalon during development of the telencephalic and optic vesicles , 2001, Neuroscience.

[37]  Julian Lewis,et al.  From Signals to Patterns: Space, Time, and Mathematics in Developmental Biology , 2008, Science.

[38]  J. Rubenstein,et al.  Frontal cortex subdivision patterning is coordinately regulated by Fgf8, Fgf17, and Emx2 , 2008, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[39]  E. Davidson,et al.  Modeling transcriptional regulatory networks. , 2002, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[40]  J. Rubenstein,et al.  Molecular regionalization of the neocortex is disrupted in Fgf8 hypomorphic mutants , 2003, Development.

[41]  J. Rubenstein,et al.  Inductive interactions direct early regionalization of the mouse forebrain. , 1997, Development.

[42]  M. Tsai,et al.  COUP-TFI: an intrinsic factor for early regionalization of the neocortex. , 2001, Genes & development.

[43]  P. Rakic,et al.  Decision by division: making cortical maps , 2009, Trends in Neurosciences.

[44]  Salvador Martinez,et al.  Dose-dependent functions of Fgf8 in regulating telencephalic patterning centers , 2006, Development.

[45]  Guy Karlebach,et al.  Modelling and analysis of gene regulatory networks , 2008, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[46]  Phil Husbands,et al.  Artificial Life IX: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on the Simulation and Synthesis of Living Systems , 2004 .

[47]  Jeff Hasty,et al.  Engineered gene circuits , 2002, Nature.

[48]  H. Othmer,et al.  The topology of the regulatory interactions predicts the expression pattern of the segment polarity genes in Drosophila melanogaster. , 2003, Journal of theoretical biology.

[49]  E. Klipp,et al.  Mathematical modeling of intracellular signaling pathways , 2006, BMC Neuroscience.

[50]  Fabian J. Theis,et al.  Spatial Analysis of Expression Patterns Predicts Genetic Interactions at the Mid-Hindbrain Boundary , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[51]  E. Grove,et al.  Generating the cerebral cortical area map. , 2003, Annual review of neuroscience.

[52]  Shen-Ju Chou,et al.  COUP-TFI regulates the balance of cortical patterning between frontal/motor and sensory areas , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[53]  Tomomi Shimogori,et al.  Embryonic signaling centers expressing BMP, WNT and FGF proteins interact to pattern the cerebral cortex , 2004, Development.

[54]  C. MacArthur,et al.  Roles for FGF8 in the Induction, Initiation, and Maintenance of Chick Limb Development , 1996, Cell.

[55]  Eric H Davidson,et al.  Properties of developmental gene regulatory networks , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Luca Muzio,et al.  Emx2 and Pax6 control regionalization of the pre-neuronogenic cortical primordium. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[57]  D. A. Baxter,et al.  Modeling transcriptional control in gene networks—methods, recent results, and future directions , 2000, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[58]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  ORIGINS OF ORDER , 2019, Origins of Order.

[59]  Michael C Crair,et al.  The Nuclear Orphan Receptor COUP-TFI Is Required for Differentiation of Subplate Neurons and Guidance of Thalamocortical Axons , 1999, Neuron.

[60]  René Thomas.  Regulatory networks seen as asynchronous automata: A logical description , 1991 .

[61]  E. Grove,et al.  Emx2 patterns the neocortex by regulating FGF positional signaling , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[62]  Stefan Bornholdt,et al.  Boolean network models of cellular regulation: prospects and limitations , 2008, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[63]  Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte,et al.  Sp8 exhibits reciprocal induction with Fgf8 but has an opposing effect on anterior-posterior cortical area patterning , 2007, Neural Development.

[64]  E. Davidson,et al.  Gene Regulatory Networks and the Evolution of Animal Body Plans , 2006, Science.

[65]  Kunihiko Kaneko,et al.  Robustness under Functional Constraint: The Genetic Network for Temporal Expression in Drosophila Neurogenesis , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[66]  Luca Muzio,et al.  Emx1, emx2 and pax6 in specification, regionalization and arealization of the cerebral cortex. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.