Causal generative models are just a start

Human reasoning is richer than Lake et al. acknowledge, and the emphasis on theories of how images and scenes are synthesized is misleading. For example, the world knowledge used in vision presumably involves a combination of geometric, physical, and other knowledge, rather than just a causal theory of how the image was produced. In physical reasoning, a model can be a set of constraints rather than a physics engine. In intuitive psychology, many inferences proceed without detailed causal generative models. How humans reliably perform such inferences, often in the face of radically incomplete information, remains a mystery.

[1]  Jessica B. Hamrick,et al.  Simulation as an engine of physical scene understanding , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Ernest Davis,et al.  The scope and limits of simulation in automated reasoning , 2016, Artif. Intell..

[3]  R. Siegler Three aspects of cognitive development , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction , 2015, Science.

[5]  Vikash K. Mansinghka,et al.  Reconciling intuitive physics and Newtonian mechanics for colliding objects. , 2013, Psychological review.

[6]  L. Tan,et al.  Reading depends on writing, in Chinese. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.