Modelling the N400 brain potential as change in a probabilistic representation of meaning
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Caplan,et al. Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[2] James L. McClelland,et al. Sentence comprehension: A parallel distributed processing approach , 1989, Language and Cognitive Processes.
[3] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing , 2007, Brain Research.
[4] Peter Hagoort,et al. The Processing Nature of the N400: Evidence from Masked Priming , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[5] George Kurian,et al. Google's Neural Machine Translation System: Bridging the Gap between Human and Machine Translation , 2016, ArXiv.
[6] E. Vogel,et al. Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink , 1996, Nature.
[7] Ellen F. Lau,et al. A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400 , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[8] A. Sanford,et al. Depth of processing in language comprehension: not noticing the evidence , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[9] Janet L. McDonald,et al. The Development of Sentence Comprehension Strategies in English and Dutch. , 1986 .
[10] M. Koivisto,et al. Cognitive representations underlying the N400 priming effect. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[11] Colin M. Brown,et al. The cascaded nature of lexical selection and integration in auditory sentence processing. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[12] M. Kutas,et al. Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words , 1991, Memory & cognition.
[13] E. Plante,et al. Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[14] A. Borst. Seeing smells: imaging olfactory learning in bees , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.
[15] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. When the Truth Is Not Too Hard to Handle , 2008, Psychological science.
[16] Colin M. Brown,et al. Semantic Integration in Sentences and Discourse: Evidence from the N400 , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[17] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. A Rose by Any Other Name: Long-Term Memory Structure and Sentence Processing , 1999 .
[18] M. Kutas,et al. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.
[19] M. Rugg. The effects of semantic priming and work repetition on event-related potentials. , 1985, Psychophysiology.
[20] H. Barber,et al. Syllable-frequency effects in visual word recognition: evidence from ERPs , 2004, Neuroreport.
[21] P. Holcomb,et al. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .
[22] D. Plaut,et al. A neurally plausible Parallel Distributed Processing model of Event-Related Potential word reading data , 2012, Brain and Language.
[23] J. Fodor. The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .
[24] G. Altmann,et al. The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye-movements , 2003 .
[25] Geoffrey E. Hinton. Learning and Applying Contextual Constraints in Sentence Comprehension , 1991 .
[26] Giosuè Baggio,et al. The balance between memory and unification in semantics: A dynamic account of the N400 , 2011 .
[27] H. Heinze,et al. Perceptual Priming Versus Explicit Memory: Dissociable Neural Correlates at Encoding , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[28] J. Debruille,et al. The N400 potential could index a semantic inhibition , 2007, Brain Research Reviews.
[29] Salim Roukos,et al. Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification. , 1983, Psychophysiology.
[30] M. Kutas,et al. An Event-Related Potential (ERP) Analysis of Semantic Congruity and Repetition Effects in Sentences , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[31] James L. McClelland,et al. The parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[32] Ann Marie Schmidt,et al. The Receptor for Advanced Glycation End Products (RAGE) Affects T Cell Differentiation in OVA Induced Asthma , 2014, PloS one.
[33] Matthew W. Crocker,et al. A Neurocomputational Model of the N400 and the P600 in Language Processing , 2016, Cognitive science.
[34] H. Kolk,et al. An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[35] Brian MacWhinney,et al. The handbook of language emergence , 2015 .
[36] G. Altmann,et al. Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.
[37] L. Osterhout,et al. Neural correlates of second-language word learning: minimal instruction produces rapid change , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.
[38] Colin M. Brown,et al. ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: the P600/SPS to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation , 2000, Neuropsychologia.
[39] Mark Steyvers,et al. Topics in semantic representation. , 2007, Psychological review.
[40] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Chapter 1 Time for Meaning: Electrophysiology Provides Insights into the Dynamics of Representation and Processing in Semantic Memory , 2009 .
[41] Karl J. Friston,et al. A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[42] Yvonne Koch. The Psychology Of Learning And Motivation , 2016 .
[43] Brian A. Wandell,et al. THE COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCES Fourth Edition , 2009 .
[44] M. Farah,et al. Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[45] M. Kutas,et al. Expect the Unexpected: Event-related Brain Response to Morphosyntactic Violations , 1998 .
[46] John C J Hoeks,et al. Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[47] Jeffrey Pennington,et al. GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation , 2014, EMNLP.
[48] J. Polich. Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[49] Geoffrey E. Hinton. Connectionist Learning Procedures , 1989, Artif. Intell..
[50] Roger Levy,et al. A noisy-channel model of rational human sentence comprehension under uncertain input , 2008, EMNLP 2008.
[51] A. Turken,et al. The Neural Architecture of the Language Comprehension Network: Converging Evidence from Lesion and Connectivity Analyses , 2011, Front. Syst. Neurosci..
[52] Jeffrey L. Elman,et al. Finding Structure in Time , 1990, Cogn. Sci..
[53] Pierre Baldi,et al. Bayesian surprise attracts human attention , 2005, Vision Research.
[54] Angela D. Friederici,et al. Isn't It Ironic? An Electrophysiological Exploration of Figurative Language Processing , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[55] Gina R Kuperberg,et al. Separate streams or probabilistic inference? What the N400 can tell us about the comprehension of events , 2016, Language, cognition and neuroscience.
[56] Milena Rabovsky,et al. Simulating the N400 ERP component as semantic network error: Insights from a feature-based connectionist attractor model of word meaning , 2014, Cognition.
[57] Gabriella Vigliocco,et al. Integrating experiential and distributional data to learn semantic representations. , 2009, Psychological review.
[58] A. Friederici. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[59] W. Sommer,et al. Differential Task Effects on N400 and P600 Elicited by Semantic and Syntactic Violations , 2014, PloS one.
[60] R. Levy. Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.
[61] James L. McClelland,et al. A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.
[62] Karl G. D. Bailey,et al. Good-Enough Representations in Language Comprehension , 2002 .
[63] Lukás Burget,et al. Strategies for training large scale neural network language models , 2011, 2011 IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition & Understanding.
[64] R. Jacobs,et al. Perception of speech reflects optimal use of probabilistic speech cues , 2008, Cognition.
[65] A. Friederici,et al. N400-like Semantic Incongruity Effect in 19-Month-Olds: Processing Known Words in Picture Contexts , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[66] S. Bookheimer. Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.
[67] Blair C. Armstrong,et al. PSPs and ERPs: Applying the dynamics of post-synaptic potentials to individual units in simulation of temporally extended Event-Related Potential reading data , 2014, Brain and Language.
[68] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.
[69] A. Jongman,et al. A comparison of semantic and syntactic event related potentials generated by children and adults , 2006, Brain and Language.
[70] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. When Peanuts Fall in Love: N400 Evidence for the Power of Discourse , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[71] S. Gotts. Incremental learning of perceptual and conceptual representations and the puzzle of neural repetition suppression , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[72] F. Pulvermüller,et al. Words in the brain's language , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[73] Bruce D. McCandliss,et al. The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[74] Samuel J Cheyette,et al. Modeling the N400 ERP component as transient semantic over-activation within a neural network model of word comprehension , 2017, Cognition.
[75] G. McCarthy,et al. Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal lobe: II. Effects of word type and semantic priming , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.
[76] G. McCarthy,et al. Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal lobe: I. Intracranial distribution and neural generators , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.
[77] L. Barsalou. Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.
[78] L. Osterhout,et al. The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2005 .
[79] J. Fodor,et al. Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis , 1988, Cognition.
[80] N. Dronkers,et al. Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension , 2004, Cognition.
[81] M. Kutas,et al. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.
[82] M. Schlesewsky,et al. The P600-as-P3 hypothesis revisited: Single-trial analyses reveal that the late EEG positivity following linguistically deviant material is reaction time aligned , 2014, Brain and Language.
[83] S. Frank,et al. The ERP response to the amount of information conveyed by words in sentences , 2015, Brain and Language.
[84] Katherine A. DeLong,et al. Predictability, plausibility, and two late ERP positivities during written sentence comprehension , 2014, Neuropsychologia.
[85] Peter Dayan,et al. A Neural Substrate of Prediction and Reward , 1997, Science.
[86] R. Jackendoff. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution , 2002 .
[87] Stephen Budiansky. Green house effect: Energy efficiency may help , 1984, Nature.
[88] M. Kutas,et al. The N400 in a semantic categorization task across 6 decades. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.