Organizational Structure-Satisfactory Social Law Determination in Multiagent Workflow Systems

The multiagent workflow systems can be formalized from an organi- zational structure viewpoint, which includes three parts: the interaction structure among agents, the temporal flow of activities, and the critical resource sharing re- lations among activities. While agents execute activities, they should decide their strategies to satisfy the constraints brought by the organizational structure of mul- tiagent workflow system. To avoid collisions in the multiagent workflow system, this paper presents a method to determine social laws in the system to restrict the strategies of agents and activities; the determined social laws can satisfy the cha- racteristics of organization structures so as to minimize the conflicts among agents and activities. Moreover, we also deal with the social law adjustment mechanism for the alternations of interaction relations, temporal flows, and critical resource sharing relations. It is proved that our model can produce useful social laws for organizational structure of multiagent workflow systems, i.e., the conflicts brought by the constraints of organization structure can be minimized.

[1]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Negotiation and Cooperation in Multi-Agent Environments , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[2]  Guido Boella,et al.  The Evolution of Artificial Social Systems , 2005, IJCAI.

[3]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  On Stable Social Laws and Qualitative Equilibria , 1998, Artif. Intell..

[4]  Yichuan Jiang,et al.  A multi-agent coordination model for the variation of underlying network topology , 2005, Expert Syst. Appl..

[5]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  Conflict resolution for air traffic management: a study in multiagent hybrid systems , 1998, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[6]  Stephen J. Buckley,et al.  Fast motion planning for multiple moving robots , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Colin T. Scott,et al.  Agent-Based Workflow: TRP Support Environment (TSE) , 1996, Comput. Networks.

[8]  Yichuan Jiang Extracting social laws from unilateral binary constraint relation topologies in multiagent systems , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  Jiuchuan Jiang,et al.  Contextual Resource Negotiation-Based Task Allocation and Load Balancing in Complex Software Systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[10]  Donghui Lin,et al.  Compatibility Analysis of Local Process Views in InterorganizationalWorkflow , 2007, The 9th IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology and The 4th IEEE International Conference on Enterprise Computing, E-Commerce and E-Services (CEC-EEE 2007).

[11]  Toru Ishida,et al.  Compatibility between the local and social performances of multi-agent societies , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[12]  José M. Vidal,et al.  Multiagent systems with workflows , 2004, IEEE Internet Computing.

[13]  Munindar P. Singh,et al.  Workflow Agents , 1998, IEEE Internet Comput..

[14]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  On Social Laws for Artificial Agent Societies: Off-Line Design , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[15]  Toru Ishida,et al.  Local interaction and non-local coordination in agent social law diffusion , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  Jiang Yi-Chuan On Self-adjustment of Social Conventions to Small Perturbations , 2008 .

[17]  Randall Davis,et al.  Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving , 1988, Artif. Intell..