Material properties derived from three-dimensional shape representations

Retinal image structure is due to a complex mixture of physical sources that includes the surface's 3D shape, light-reflectance and transmittance properties, and the light field. The visual system can somehow discriminate between these different sources of image structure and recover information about the objects and surfaces in the scene. There has been significant debate about the nature of the representations that are used to derive surface reflectance properties such as specularity (gloss). Specularity could be derived either directly from 2D image properties or by exploiting information that can only be derived from representations in which 3D shape has been made explicit. We recently provided evidence that 3D shape information can play a critical role in the perception of material specularity, but the shape manipulation in our prior study also significantly changed 2D image properties (Marlow, Todorović, & Anderson, 2015). Here, we held fixed all monocularly visible 2D image properties and manipulated 3D shape stereoscopically. When binocularly fused, the depicted 3D shapes induced striking transformations in the surfaces' apparent material properties, which vary from matte to 'metallic'. Our psychophysical measurements of perceived specularity reveal that 3D shape information can play a critical role in material perception for both singly-curved surfaces and more complex geometries that curve in two directions. These results provide strong evidence that the perception of material specularity can depend on physical constraints derived from representations in which three-dimensional shape has been made explicit.

[1]  Barton L. Anderson,et al.  Coupled computations of three-dimensional shape and material , 2015, Current Biology.

[2]  M. Landy,et al.  Conjoint Measurement of Gloss and Surface Texture , 2008, Psychological science.

[3]  D. L. Macadam,et al.  The measurement of appearance , 1975 .

[4]  Huseyin Boyaci,et al.  Estimating the glossiness transfer function induced by illumination change and testing its transitivity. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[5]  J. Beck,et al.  Highlights and the perception of glossiness , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  David H Brainard,et al.  Joint effects of illumination geometry and object shape in the perception of surface reflectance , 2011, i-Perception.

[7]  S. Laughlin,et al.  Predictive coding: a fresh view of inhibition in the retina , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[8]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  The role of brightness and orientation congruence in the perception of surface gloss. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[9]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  Generalization of Lambert's reflectance model , 1994, SIGGRAPH.

[10]  A. Witkin,et al.  On the Role of Structure in Vision , 1983 .

[11]  S. Nishida,et al.  Use of image-based information in judgments of surface-reflectance properties. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[12]  G. Obein,et al.  Difference scaling of gloss: nonlinearity, binocularity, and constancy. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[13]  Phillip J. Marlow,et al.  The Perception and Misperception of Specular Surface Reflectance , 2012, Current Biology.

[14]  Ofir Weber,et al.  Conformal mesh deformations with Möbius transformations , 2015, ACM Trans. Graph..

[15]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  Image statistics and the perception of surface gloss and lightness. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[16]  Andrew Blake,et al.  Specular reflections and the estimation of shape from binocular disparity , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Karl R Gegenfurtner,et al.  Categorical sensitivity to color differences. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[18]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Perception of shape from shading , 1988, Nature.

[19]  Vebjørn Ekroll,et al.  Disparity, motion, and color information improve gloss constancy performance. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[20]  Vision Research , 1961, Nature.

[21]  Wendy J Adams,et al.  Highlights, disparity, and perceived gloss with convex and concave surfaces. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[22]  Jeffrey S. Perry,et al.  Contour statistics in natural images: Grouping across occlusions , 2009, Visual Neuroscience.

[23]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Exploring features in a Bayesian framework for material recognition , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[24]  David J. Field,et al.  Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images , 1996, Nature.

[25]  Phillip J. Marlow,et al.  The perception of gloss depends on highlight congruence with surface shading. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[26]  D. Knill,et al.  Apparent surface curvature affects lightness perception , 1991, Nature.

[27]  Maria Olkkonen,et al.  Perceived glossiness and lightness under real-world illumination. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[28]  F. Scharnowski,et al.  Long-lasting modulation of feature integration by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[29]  J. Weesie,et al.  Integration of visual and inertial cues in perceived heading of self-motion. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[30]  E. Mingolla,et al.  Remote Effects of Highlights on Gloss Perception , 2005, Perception.

[31]  E. Adelson,et al.  Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities , 2007, Nature.

[32]  Silvio Savarese,et al.  Detecting Specular Surfaces on Natural Images , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[33]  R. Evans,et al.  Identification of a new class of steroid hormone receptors , 1988, Nature.

[34]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  Generative constraints on image cues for perceived gloss. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[35]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Low-Level Image Cues in the Perception of Translucent Materials , 2005, TAP.

[36]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Does the brain know the physics of specular reflection? , 1990, Nature.

[37]  Atsushi Kimura,et al.  Luminance distribution modifies the perceived freshness of strawberries , 2012, i-Perception.

[38]  Richard Szeliski,et al.  Impossible Shaded Images , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[39]  Jeffrey S. Perry,et al.  Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance , 2001, Vision Research.

[40]  Roland W Fleming,et al.  Real-world illumination and the perception of surface reflectance properties. , 2003, Journal of vision.

[41]  Isamu Motoyoshi,et al.  Variability in constancy of the perceived surface reflectance across different illumination statistics , 2012, Vision Research.

[42]  Donald P. Greenberg,et al.  Toward a psychophysically-based light reflection model for image synthesis , 2000, SIGGRAPH.

[43]  Philip Dutré,et al.  The influence of shape on the perception of material reflectance , 2007, ACM Trans. Graph..

[44]  K. Bird Analysis of Variance via Confidence Intervals , 2004 .

[45]  F. Billmeyer,et al.  Visual gloss scaling and multidimensional scaling analysis of painted specimens , 1987 .

[46]  F. E. Nicodemus Directional Reflectance and Emissivity of an Opaque Surface , 1965 .

[47]  J J Koenderink,et al.  What Does the Occluding Contour Tell Us about Solid Shape? , 1984, Perception.

[48]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  Image statistics do not explain the perception of gloss and lightness. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[49]  Sylvia C. Pont,et al.  A comparison of material and illumination discrimination performance for real rough, real smooth and computer generated smooth spheres , 2005, APGV '05.

[50]  E. Mingolla,et al.  Lightness Constancy in the Presence of Specular Highlights , 2004, Psychological science.

[51]  Wojciech Chojnacki,et al.  Impossible and ambiguous shading patterns , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[52]  Barton L Anderson,et al.  The dark side of gloss , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[53]  S. Pont,et al.  Material — Illumination Ambiguities and the Perception of Solid Objects , 2006, Perception.

[54]  Dejan Todorović How shape from contours affects shape from shading , 2014, Vision Research.

[55]  Qasim Zaidi,et al.  Frequency-based heuristics for material perception. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[56]  Junyu Dong,et al.  Why do rough surfaces appear glossy? , 2014, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[57]  H. Barrow,et al.  RECOVERING INTRINSIC SCENE CHARACTERISTICS FROM IMAGES , 1978 .

[58]  Sylvia C Pont,et al.  Illusory gloss on Lambertian surfaces. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[59]  E. Adelson,et al.  Image statistics for surface reflectance perception. , 2008, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[60]  Leif Kobbelt,et al.  Character animation from 2D pictures and 3D motion data , 2007, TOGS.

[61]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.