Comparative image quality assessment using free energy minimization

It is a straightforward task for human observers to judge the relative quality of two visual signals of the same content, but subject to different type/level of distortions. However, this comparative image quality assessment (C-IQA) problem remains a difficult challenge for the current research of image quality assessment (IQA). In this paper, we propose a C-IQA approach to predict the relative perceptual quality of a pair of images that are possibly subject to different artifact types/levels. The C-IQA algorithm is designed to emulate the process of comparing the relative quality of two visual stimuli as performed by the human visual system (HVS) within the framework of free energy minimization. The brain's internal generative models initialized on the inputs are used to explain the two images. And their relative quality can then be determined through comparing the free energy level of this model-data fitting process. In the existing work of IQA, the full-reference (FR) and reduced-reference (RR) methods need the prior knowledge of the original images while the no-reference (NR) algorithms usually work with a single input image. The C-IQA approach is inherently different from those existing methods in that it takes as input an image pair and predicts their relative quality without using any knowledge about the original image. A computationally efficient solution to the proposed C-IQA scheme based on a linear autoregressive image model is also introduced. Experimental results show that the proposed method achieves about 98% accuracy in line with the subjective ratings when applied on over 300,000 image pairs sampled from the LIVE database, outperforming the FR metrics such as PSNR, SSIM, and some of the most advanced NR IQA algorithms.

[1]  Xiangjun Zhang,et al.  Image Interpolation by Adaptive 2-D Autoregressive Modeling and Soft-Decision Estimation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[2]  Hagai Attias,et al.  A Variational Bayesian Framework for Graphical Models , 1999 .

[3]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A free energy principle for the brain , 2006, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[4]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Blind Image Quality Assessment: From Natural Scene Statistics to Perceptual Quality , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Keeping the neural networks simple by minimizing the description length of the weights , 1993, COLT '93.

[6]  Xuelong Li,et al.  Sparse representation for blind image quality assessment , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[7]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Blind measurement of blocking artifacts in images , 2000, Proceedings 2000 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.00CH37101).

[8]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  On Advances in Statistical Modeling of Natural Images , 2004, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[9]  Weisi Lin,et al.  A Psychovisual Quality Metric in Free-Energy Principle , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  Stefan Winkler,et al.  Perceptual blur and ringing metrics: application to JPEG2000 , 2004, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[11]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[12]  Wenjun Zhang,et al.  Adaptive Sequential Prediction of Multidimensional Signals With Applications to Lossless Image Coding , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[13]  Xin Li,et al.  Blind image quality assessment , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing.

[14]  Eero P. Simoncelli Capturing Visual Image Properties with Probabilistic Models , 2009 .

[15]  Xiang Zhu,et al.  Automatic Parameter Selection for Denoising Algorithms Using a No-Reference Measure of Image Content , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[16]  Christophe Charrier,et al.  Blind Image Quality Assessment: A Natural Scene Statistics Approach in the DCT Domain , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[18]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Perceptual visual quality metrics: A survey , 2011, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[19]  Ingrid Heynderickx,et al.  A No-Reference Metric for Perceived Ringing Artifacts in Images , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[20]  Stefan Winkler,et al.  A no-reference perceptual blur metric , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing.

[21]  H.R. Wu,et al.  A generalized block-edge impairment metric for video coding , 1997, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[22]  Glen G. Langdon,et al.  Universal modeling and coding , 1981, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[23]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[24]  Xiangjun Zhang,et al.  Low Bit-Rate Image Compression via Adaptive Down-Sampling and Constrained Least Squares Upconversion , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[25]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  No-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[26]  D. Knill,et al.  The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[27]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Two-Step Framework for Constructing Blind Image Quality Indices , 2010, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[28]  Lina J. Karam,et al.  A No-Reference Objective Image Sharpness Metric Based on the Notion of Just Noticeable Blur (JNB) , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.