Sexual reproduction and Muller's ratchet in digital organisms

The evolution of sexual reproduction has long been a major problem in biology. According to one theory, sex opposes the fitness-destroying process of Muller's ratchet, which occurs by the stochastic loss of high-fitness genotypes in small populations. Sex opposes the ratchet by allowing genotypes with different deleterious mutations to produce mutation-free offspring. We used the Avida digitalevolution software to investigate sex in relation to Muller's ratchet. Populations of digital organisms mutated, competed, and evolved in a complex environment. Populations were either asexual or sexual; in the latter case, parental genomes recombined to produce offspring. We also varied genomic mutation rates and population sizes, which at extreme values often caused mutational meltdowns and population extinctions. Our results demonstrate that sex is advantageous for population survival under some conditions. However, differences in extinction probabilities were usually small, occurred over a narrow range of mutation rates and population sizes, and the advantage of sex for population survival required many generations. Also, the mean fitness of surviving asexual populations was often greater than in sexual populations. This last result indicates the need for work that compares the statistical distribution of mutational effects and epistatic interactions in asexual and sexual populations.

[1]  J. M. Smith What use is sex? , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  J. Felsenstein The evolutionary advantage of recombination. , 1974, Genetics.

[3]  P. Feldman Evolution of sex , 1975, Nature.

[4]  A. Kondrashov Selection against harmful mutations in large sexual and asexual populations. , 1982, Genetical research.

[5]  G. Bell The Masterpiece of Nature , 2019 .

[6]  W. M. Lewis Interruption of Synthesis as a Cost of Sex in Small Organisms , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[7]  G. Bell,et al.  Sex And Death In Protozoa , 1988 .

[8]  B. Charlesworth The evolution of sex and recombination. , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[9]  M. Nowak,et al.  Error thresholds of replication in finite populations mutation frequencies and the onset of Muller's ratchet. , 1989, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  Lin Chao,et al.  Fitness of RNA virus decreased by Muller's ratchet , 1990, Nature.

[11]  L. Chao,et al.  MULLER'S RATCHET AND THE ADVANTAGE OF SEX IN THE RNA VIRUS ϟ6 , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  A. Moya,et al.  Rapid fitness losses in mammalian RNA virus clones due to Muller's ratchet. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  M. Lynch,et al.  The mutational meltdown in asexual populations. , 1993, The Journal of heredity.

[14]  A. Kondrashov,et al.  Classification of hypotheses on the advantage of amphimixis. , 1993, The Journal of heredity.

[15]  Reinhard Bürger,et al.  MUTATIONAL MELTDOWNS IN SEXUAL POPULATIONS , 1995, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  D. Andersson,et al.  Muller's ratchet decreases fitness of a DNA-based microbe. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  Lenski A distinction between the origin and maintenance of sex , 1999 .

[18]  C. Ofria,et al.  Genome complexity, robustness and genetic interactions in digital organisms , 1999, Nature.

[19]  Christoph Endres,et al.  Introduction to Artificial Life , 2000, Künstliche Intell..

[20]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Comparison of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results , 2000, Evolutionary Computation.

[21]  C. Adami,et al.  Evolution of Biological Complexity , 2000, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[22]  C. Ofria,et al.  Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rates leads to survival of the flattest , 2001, Nature.

[23]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  On the Effects of Archiving, Elitism, and Density Based Selection in Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization , 2001, EMO.

[24]  C. Wilke,et al.  The biology of digital organisms , 2002 .

[25]  C. Adami AB INITIO MODELING OF ECOSYSTEMS WITH ARTIFICIAL LIFE , 2002 .

[26]  W. Rice Evolution of sex: Experimental tests of the adaptive significance of sexual recombination , 2002, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[27]  R. H.J.MULLE THE RELATION OF RECOMBINATION TO MUTATIONAL ADVANCE , 2002 .

[28]  Robert T. Pennock,et al.  The evolutionary origin of complex features , 2003, Nature.

[29]  Charles Ofria,et al.  Avida , 2004, Artificial Life.