Complex cells increase their phase sensitivity at low contrasts and following adaptation.

One of the best-known dichotomies in neuroscience is the division of neurons in the mammalian primary visual cortex into simple and complex cells. Simple cells have receptive fields with separate on and off subregions and give phase-sensitive responses to moving gratings, whereas complex cells have uniform receptive fields and are phase invariant. The phase sensitivity of a cell is calculated as the ratio of the first Fourier coefficient (F1) to the mean time-average (Fo) of the response to moving sinusoidal gratings at 100% contrast. Cells are then classified as simple (F1/Fo >1) or complex (F1/Fo <1). We manipulated cell responses by changing the stimulus contrast or through adaptation. The F(1)/F(0) ratios of cells defined as complex at 100% contrast increased at low contrasts and following adaptation. Conversely, the F1/Fo ratios remained constant for cells defined as simple at 100% contrast. The latter cell type was primarily located in thalamorecipient layers 4 and 6. Many cells initially classified as complex exhibit F1/Fo >1 at low contrasts and after adaptation (particularly in layer 4). The results are consistent with the spike-threshold hypothesis, which suggests that the division of cells into two types arises from the nonlinear interaction of spike threshold with membrane potential responses.

[1]  D. Ringach,et al.  Spatial overlap of ON and OFF subregions and its relation to response modulation ratio in macaque primary visual cortex. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Stephen D. Van Hooser,et al.  Functional cell classes and functional architecture in the early visual system of a highly visual rodent. , 2005, Progress in brain research.

[3]  R. Shapley,et al.  An egalitarian network model for the emergence of simple and complex cells in visual cortex , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Stimulus specificity in the human visual system. , 1973, Vision research.

[5]  M. Carandini,et al.  A tonic hyperpolarization underlying contrast adaptation in cat visual cortex. , 1997, Science.

[6]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Contrast gain control in the cat visual cortex , 1982, Nature.

[7]  C. Rocha-Miranda,et al.  Receptive field properties of single units in the opossum striate cortex , 1976, Brain Research.

[8]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  M. Carandini,et al.  Orientation tuning of input conductance, excitation, and inhibition in cat primary visual cortex. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  On the distinctness of simple and complex cells in the visual cortex of the cat. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  M. Ibbotson,et al.  On the division of cortical cells into simple and complex types: a comparative viewpoint. , 2005, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[12]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  Membrane Mechanisms Underlying Contrast Adaptation in Cat Area 17In Vivo , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  M. Carandini,et al.  Membrane Potential and Firing Rate in Cat Primary Visual Cortex , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  B. Dreher,et al.  Relationship between contrast adaptation and orientation tuning in V1 and V2 of cat visual cortex. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  J. Movshon,et al.  Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[16]  R. Shapley,et al.  Contrast's effect on spatial summation by macaque V1 neurons , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  M. Hawken,et al.  Laminar organization and contrast sensitivity of direction-selective cells in the striate cortex of the Old World monkey , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  J. Movshon,et al.  Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[19]  R. Reid,et al.  Attention Modulates the Responses of Simple Cells in Monkey Primary Visual Cortex , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  R. Reid,et al.  Receptive field structure varies with layer in the primary visual cortex , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  Robert J. Snowden,et al.  Perceived contrast as a function of adaptation duration , 1994, Vision Research.

[23]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  The effects of contrast on the linearity of spatial summation of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Spatial‐frequency tuning and geniculocortical projections in the visual cortex (areas 17 and 18) of the pigmented ferret , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.

[25]  D. Ringach,et al.  On the classification of simple and complex cells , 2002, Vision Research.

[26]  BsnNr C. Srorn,et al.  CLASSIFYING SIMPLE AND COMPLEX CELLS ON THE BASIS OF RESPONSE MODULATION , 2002 .

[27]  Norberto M. Grzywacz,et al.  Occlusions and their relationship with the distribution of contrasts in natural images , 2000, Vision Research.

[28]  Bogdan Dreher,et al.  ‘Simplification’ of responses of complex cells in cat striate cortex: suppressive surrounds and ‘feedback’ inactivation , 2006, The Journal of physiology.

[29]  William Bialek,et al.  Statistics of Natural Images: Scaling in the Woods , 1993, NIPS.

[30]  Frances S. Chance,et al.  Complex cells as cortically amplified simple cells , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  A. Peters,et al.  The cat primary visual cortex , 2002 .

[32]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  Calculating the contrasts that retinal ganglion cells and LGN neurones encounter in natural scenes , 2000, Vision Research.

[33]  D. Snodderly,et al.  Spatial organization of receptive fields of V1 neurons of alert monkeys: comparison with responses to gratings. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  R. Lund,et al.  Receptive field properties of single neurons in rat primary visual cortex. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  David J Tolhurst,et al.  Coding of the contrasts in natural images by visual cortex (V1) neurons: a Bayesian approach. , 2003, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[36]  A. Peters,et al.  The Concept of Cat Primary Visual Cortex , 2002 .

[37]  R. Shapley,et al.  Orientation Selectivity in Macaque V1: Diversity and Laminar Dependence , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  R. Shapley,et al.  Area (mt) Spatial Summation, End Inhibition and Side Inhibition in the Middle Temporal Visual Adaptation Complex Cells Increase Their Phase Sensitivity at Low Contrasts and following Dependence of Response Properties on Sparse Connectivity in a Spiking Neuron Model Of , 2022 .

[39]  F. Mechler,et al.  Formal and attribute-specific information in primary visual cortex. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[41]  F. Mechler,et al.  Detection and Discrimination of Relative Spatial Phase by V1 Neurons , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  M. R. Ibbotson,et al.  Orientation and spatiotemporal tuning of cells in the primary visual cortex of an Australian marsupial, the wallaby Macropus eugenii , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[43]  W. G. Owen,et al.  Linear transduction of natural stimuli by dark‐adapted and light‐adapted rods of the salamander, Ambystoma tigrinum , 1997, The Journal of physiology.

[44]  M. Ibbotson,et al.  Neurons in V1, V2, and PMLS of cat cortex are speed tuned but not acceleration tuned: the influence of motion adaptation. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  Nicholas J. Priebe,et al.  The contribution of spike threshold to the dichotomy of cortical simple and complex cells , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  J. Touryan,et al.  Spatial Structure of Complex Cell Receptive Fields Measured with Natural Images , 2005, Neuron.

[47]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Contrast gain control in the cat's visual system. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.