Integrated modeling and robust control for full-envelope flight of robotic helicopters

To accomplish successfully the complex future mission in civilian and military scenarios, robotic helicopters need to have controllers that exploit their full dynamic capabilities. The absence of high-fidelity simulation models has prevented the use of well established multivariable control techniques for the design of high-bandwidth full-flight-envelope control systems. Existing model-based controllers are of low bandwidth and cover only small portions of the vehicle's flight envelope. In this paper we present the results of the synergistic use of high-fidelity integrated modeling strategies, robust multivariable control techniques, and classical gain scheduling for the rapid and reliable design of high-bandwidth full-flight envelope controllers for robotic helicopters. We implemented and flight tested a gain-scheduled H/sub /spl infin// loop-shaping controller on the Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) Yamaha R-50 robotic helicopter. During the flight tests, the CMU R-50 flew several high-speed maneuvers. We believe that our modeling/control approach quickly delivers controllers that exploit the full dynamic capabilities of the airframe and thus are ready to be used by higher level navigation systems for complex autonomous missions.

[1]  David A. Peters,et al.  Theoretical prediction of dynamic inflow derivatives , 1980 .

[2]  Keith Glover,et al.  Pole/zero cancellations in the general H ∞ problem with reference to a two block design , 1990 .

[3]  Keith Glover,et al.  A loop-shaping design procedure using H/sub infinity / synthesis , 1992 .

[4]  Bruce A. Francis,et al.  Feedback Control Theory , 1992 .

[5]  Manfred Morari,et al.  A unified framework for the study of anti-windup designs , 1994, Autom..

[6]  Hans P. Geering,et al.  Robust helicopter position control at hover , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 American Control Conference - ACC '94.

[7]  Jeffrey D. Keller,et al.  An investigation of helicopter dynamic coupling using an analytical model , 1996 .

[8]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Vision-Based Autonomous Helicopter Research at Carnegie Mellon Robotics Institute 1991-1997 , 1998 .

[9]  George Papageorgiou,et al.  H-infinity loop shaping: why is it a sensible procedure for designing robust flight controllers? , 1999 .

[10]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Attitude control optimization for a small-scale unmanned helicopter , 2000 .

[11]  K. Glover,et al.  Guaranteed multi-loop stability margins and the gap metric , 2000, Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.00CH37187).

[12]  Hyoun Jin Kim,et al.  Control system design for rotorcraft-based unmanned aerial vehicles using time-domain system identification , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000. IEEE International Conference on Control Applications. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37162).

[13]  Bernard Mettler,et al.  Design and applications of an avionics system for a miniature acrobatic helicopter , 2001, 20th DASC. 20th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (Cat. No.01CH37219).

[14]  Anthony J. Calise,et al.  Adaptive Output Feedback for High-Bandwidth Control of an Unmanned Helicopter , 2001 .

[15]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Design and Flight Testing of a High-Bandwidth H-Infinity Loop Shaping Controller for a Robotic Helicopter , 2002 .

[16]  Marco,et al.  Modeling of Small-Scale Helicopters with Integrated First-Principles and System-Identification Techniques , 2002 .

[17]  W.C. Messner,et al.  Design and flight testing of a gain-scheduled H/sub /spl infin// loop shaping controller for wide-envelope flight of a robotic helicopter , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, 2003..