Teamwork in Integrated Design Projects: Understanding the Effects of Trust, Conflict, and Collaboration on Performance

Teamwork during integrated design projects is complex. We address this by investigating how trust, collaboration, and conflict evolve over time to affect performance. Our results stem from data gathered using validated self-report questionnaires with 38 participants in 5 multidisciplinary teams at three points in time during a 6-week integrated design competition. Results show that without collaboration, trust and conflict have no bearing on performance. In addition to an unambiguous practical outcome—fostering collaboration helps build trust and manage conflict—our study points to theoretical developments: as trust- and conflict-performance relations grow over time, so does collaboration's mediating effect.

[1]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[2]  R. Peterson,et al.  Task Conflict snd Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. , 1998 .

[3]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[4]  B. Tuckman.  DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[5]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[6]  Kara A. Incalcaterra,et al.  A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  V. Druskat,et al.  Learning versus Performance in Short-Term Project Teams , 2000 .

[8]  Kenneth E. Boulding,et al.  Conflict and Defense: A General Theory , 1962 .

[9]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Trust within organisations , 2003 .

[10]  Kenneth E. Boulding,et al.  Conflict and Defense: A General Theory , 1962 .

[11]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  Contracts and production , 2006 .

[12]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[13]  M. D. Dunnette.  Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology , 2005 .

[14]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Does Team Building Work? , 2009 .

[15]  J. McGrath.  Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[16]  Jane S. Halonen,et al.  Quality benchmarks in undergraduate psychology programs. , 2007, The American psychologist.

[17]  Amitai Etzioni,et al.  Conflict and Defense: A General Theory. , 1963 .

[18]  Cary L. Cooper,et al.  The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Behavior , 2008 .

[19]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  W. Newstetter,et al.  Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education , 2001 .

[21]  Kenneth L. Bettenhausen.  Five Years of Groups Research: What We Have Learned and What Needs to Be Addressed , 1991 .

[22]  Laurie R. Weingart,et al.  Communication Processes and Conflict Management , 2007 .

[23]  S. M. Kinsella.  Activity-Based Costing: Does it Warrant Inclusion in a Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)? , 2002 .

[24]  Ronald F. Piccolo,et al.  A META‐ANALYSIS OF TEAMWORK PROCESSES: TESTS OF A MULTIDIMENSIONAL MODEL AND RELATIONSHIPS WITH TEAM EFFECTIVENESS CRITERIA , 2008 .

[25]  François Chiocchio,et al.  Project Team Performance: A Study of Electronic Task and Coordination Communication , 2007 .

[26]  Bill Burke,et al.  Fundamentals of Integrated Design for Sustainable Building , 2009 .

[27]  Larry A. Samovar,et al.  Small Group Communication , 1991 .

[28]  S. Parker,et al.  A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts , 2007 .

[29]  F. Blackler,et al.  Managing Experts and Competing through Innovation: An Activity Theoretical Analysis , 1999 .

[30]  Hj Norussis,et al.  SPSS for Windows , 1993 .

[31]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Work Groups and Teams in Organizations , 2003 .

[32]  E. Mannix,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance. , 2001 .

[33]  Kenneth S. Law,et al.  CONFLICT MANAGEMENT, EFFICACY, AND PERFORMANCE IN ORGANIZATIONAL TEAMS , 2000 .

[34]  A. Banks,et al.  Effective self‐regulating teams: a generative psychological approach , 2010 .

[35]  Şule Taşlı Pektaş,et al.  Modelling detailed information flows in building design with the parameter-based design structure matrix , 2006 .

[36]  L. Pondy.  Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. , 1967 .

[37]  Megan Lee Endres,et al.  Preparing students for success in team work environments: The importance of building confidence , 2002 .

[38]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  INTRAGROUP CONFLICT IN ORGANIZATIONS: A CONTINGENCY PERSPECTIVE ON THE CONFLICT-OUTCOME RELATIONSHIP , 2003 .

[39]  David Zager,et al.  Collaboration as an Activity Coordinating with Pseudo-Collective Objects , 2002, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[40]  B. Tuckman,et al.  Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited , 1977 .

[41]  Obata Kassabaum Hellmuth,et al.  The HOK guidebook to sustainable design , 2000 .

[42]  W. Newstetter,et al.  Novice Conceptions of Design: Implications for the Design of Learning Environments , 2001 .

[43]  K. Jehn.  A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[44]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[45]  Eddy Krygiel,et al.  Green BIM: Successful Sustainable Design with Building Information Modeling , 2008 .

[46]  M. Beaulieu,et al.  The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frameworks , 2005, Journal of interprofessional care.

[47]  Remus Ilies,et al.  Goal regulation across time: the effects of feedback and affect. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[48]  David Arditi,et al.  FACTORS THAT AFFECT PROCESS QUALITY IN THE LIFE CYCLE OF BUILDING PROJECTS , 1998 .

[49]  Michael A. West,et al.  International handbook of organizational teamwork and cooperative working , 2008 .

[50]  Ana Cristina Costa,et al.  Work team trust and effectiveness , 2003 .

[51]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: a meta-analytic review and test of two theories. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[52]  Mary Lou Maher,et al.  The Impact of Tangible User Interfaces on Designers' Spatial Cognition , 2008, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[53]  G. Stewart.  A Meta-Analytic Review of Relationships Between Team Design Features and Team Performance , 2006 .

[54]  Geoff Rounce.  Quality, waste and cost considerations in architectural building design management , 1998 .

[55]  M. Deutsch.  Cooperation and Conflict: A Personal Perspective on the History of the Social Psychological Study of Conflict Resolution , 2008 .

[56]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Multilevel Theory, Research, a n d M e t h o d s i n Organizations Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions , 2022 .

[57]  H. Williams.  Teams at work. , 2008 .

[58]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[59]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[60]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified , 1990 .

[61]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[62]  Karen A. Jehn,et al.  Conflict, Diversity, and Faultlines in Workgroups , 2008 .

[63]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[64]  G. R. Brundtland.  Our Common Future World Commission on Environment and Development , 1987 .

[65]  R. Golembiewski.  Handbook of Organizational Behavior , 2001 .