The detection of structure in glass patterns: Psychophysics and computational models

Experiments are reported which examine the judgement of the mean orientation of textures composed either of short lines or dipoles (Glass patterns). The effects of element length, density, and orientation variation are described. Psychophysical data are compared with predictions from four schemes for extracting features from Glass patterns: token matching, isotropic filtering, oriented filtering, and "adaptive" filtering (selection of local peak output from multiply oriented filters). Glass patterns are spatially broadband but only contain orientation structure at a narrow range of scales making them suitable for examining how filter size is selected for texture processing. A criterion for scale selection is proposed: that local variation of feature orientation should be minimized. Simulations indicate that neither models using isotropic filtering nor token matching achieve human levels of performance on certain tasks. Adaptive filtering, operating at a scale selected using the criterion described, provides good agreement with the psychophysical data reported and is a practical scheme for deriving features using oriented filters.

[1]  Alan L. Yuille,et al.  Scaling Theorems for Zero Crossings , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  D. Burr,et al.  Functional implications of cross-orientation inhibition of cortical visual cells. I. Neurophysiological evidence , 1982, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[3]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  Steven W. Zucker,et al.  Local Scale Control for Edge Detection and Blur Estimation , 1996, ECCV.

[5]  Richard Fryer,et al.  Texture Boundary Detection — A Structural Approach , 1991 .

[6]  P Perona,et al.  Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[7]  Andrew P. Witkin,et al.  Uniqueness of the Gaussian Kernel for Scale-Space Filtering , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[8]  Wen Wen,et al.  Texture Boundary Detection - A Structural Approach , 1991, BMVC.

[9]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[10]  O. Braddick Visual hyperacuity. , 1984, Nature.

[11]  M. Georgeson Human vision combines oriented filters to compute edges , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[12]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  The Design and Use of Steerable Filters , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[13]  B Jenkins,et al.  Spatial limits to the detection of transpositional symmetry in dynamic dot textures. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  K. Prazdny Psychophysical and computational studies of random-dot Moire patterns. , 1986, Spatial vision.

[15]  David C. Burr,et al.  Evidence for the existence and development of visual inhibition in humans , 1986, Nature.

[16]  H. Barlow,et al.  Limit to the detection of Glass patterns in the presence of noise. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[17]  D. Watt Visual Processing: Computational Psychophysical and Cognitive Research , 1990 .

[18]  Andrew P. Witkin,et al.  Scale-Space Filtering , 1983, IJCAI.

[19]  Ramakant Nevatia,et al.  Structural Analysis of Natural Textures , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[20]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Higher-order structure in regularity detection , 1993, Vision Research.

[21]  D. P. Andrews,et al.  APE: Adaptive probit estimation of psychometric functions , 1981 .

[22]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration across depth , 1995, Vision Research.

[23]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Computing texture boundaries from images , 1988, Nature.

[24]  M. Fahle,et al.  Effects of pattern element density upon displacement limits for motion detection in random binary luminance patterns , 1992, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  S. Appelle Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals. , 1972, Psychological bulletin.

[26]  B Jenkins,et al.  Orientational anisotropy in the human visual system , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  H. Wilson,et al.  Modified line-element theory for spatial-frequency and width discrimination. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[28]  D Marr,et al.  Early processing of visual information. , 1976, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[29]  H. Wilson,et al.  Orientation bandwidths of spatial mechanisms measured by masking. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[30]  B Julesz,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for global feature processing in visual texture discrimination. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[31]  Andrew P. Witkin,et al.  Analyzing Oriented Patterns , 1985, IJCAI.

[32]  L. Glass,et al.  Pattern Recognition in Humans: Correlations Which Cannot be Perceived , 1976, Perception.

[33]  R. Pérez,et al.  Perception of Random Dot Interference Patterns , 1973, Nature.