Digitized Residential Address System: A Necessity Towards the Faster Service Delivery and Smart Cities Development in India

The Economic development of the country also depends on its IT enabled services available to common citizens. The cost effective services, delivery mode and delivery time make the governance friendly to the citizens. But the conflicting and lengthy house’s address system in India causes a lot of delays in services delivery. A house or building address can be used for various purposes like postal services, courier services, logistics services delivery, meetings, party venue etc. A high degree of failed service deliveries provide a gap to digitize the house address system to deliver accurate and faster services to the citizens. The paper proposes a conceptual method to digitize the house address system which may be stored electronically into a centralized database to reduce the time consuming process of writing and storing a lengthy address repeatedly for delivering the various services. The paper also explores the possibilities of how this digitized address could be integrated with the aadhaar database system to make it more potentially applied in terms of citizens’ oriented applications and services. The digitized address would contribute significantly to transform India into a digitally empowered society and knowledge economy.

[1]  Lori Tavasszy,et al.  Improving Home Delivery Efficiency by Using Principles of Address Intelligence for B2C Deliveries , 2016 .

[2]  Khaldoun Batiha,et al.  Measuring user satisfaction from e-Government services: Lessons from Jordan , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[3]  Tomasz Janowski,et al.  Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[4]  T. Jung,et al.  The role of stakeholder collaboration in culture-led urban regeneration: A case study of the Gwangju project, Korea , 2015 .

[5]  Omar E. M. Khalil,et al.  e-Government readiness: Does national culture matter? , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[6]  Sheng Zhong,et al.  Artists and Shanghai's culture-led urban regeneration , 2016 .

[7]  S. Miles,et al.  Introduction: The Rise and Rise of Culture-led Urban Regeneration , 2005 .

[8]  Stephen M. Mutula Digital divide and economic development: case study of sub-Saharan Africa , 2008, Electron. Libr..

[9]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Research note: Toward a reference process model for citizen‐oriented evaluation of e‐Government services , 2008 .

[10]  Daniel Belanche,et al.  City attachment and use of urban services: Benefits for smart cities , 2016 .

[11]  Anteneh Ayanso,et al.  An analytics approach to exploring the link between ICT development and affordability , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[12]  M. P. Gupta,et al.  E-government evaluation: a framework and case study , 2003, Gov. Inf. Q..

[13]  Dennis Linders,et al.  From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  P. Nagabhushan,et al.  A Knowledge based Fast PIN code Validation System for Dispatch Sorting of Postal Mail 1 , 2003 .

[15]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  The endless wire: e-government as global phenomenon , 2003, Gov. Inf. Q..

[16]  Sarah Cotterill,et al.  Transformational Government? The role of information technology in delivering citizen-centric local public services , 2007 .

[17]  Inger Brännström,et al.  Gender and digital divide 2000-2008 in two low-income economies in Sub-Saharan Africa: Kenya and Somalia in official statistics , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[18]  Anna Corinna Cagliano,et al.  Current trends in Smart City initiatives: some stylised facts , 2014 .