Do Humans Integrate Routes Into a Cognitive Map? Map- Versus Landmark-Based Navigation of Novel Shortcuts

Do humans integrate experience on specific routes into metric survey knowledge of the environment, or do they depend on a simpler strategy of landmark navigation? The authors tested this question using a novel shortcut paradigm during walking in a virtual environment. The authors find that participants could not take successful shortcuts in a desert world but could do so with dispersed landmarks in a forest. On catch trials, participants were drawn toward the displaced landmarks whether the landmarks were clustered near the target location or along the shortcut route. However, when landmarks appeared unreliable, participants fell back on coarse survey knowledge. Like honeybees (F. C. Dyer, 1991), humans do not appear to derive accurate cognitive maps from path integration to guide navigation but, instead, depend on landmarks when they are available.

[1]  Edward Chace Tolman,et al.  "Insight" in rats , 1930 .

[2]  E. Tolman Cognitive maps in rats and men. , 1948, Psychological review.

[3]  F. Restle Discrimination of cues in mazes: a resolution of the place-vs.-response question. , 1957, Psychological review.

[4]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[5]  F. N. Shemyakin General problems of orientation in space and space representations , 1962 .

[6]  Terence Lee “Brennan's Law” of Shopping Behaviour , 1962 .

[7]  C. Doxiadis Ekistics: An introduction to the science of human settlements , 1968 .

[8]  Donald Appleyard,et al.  Why Buildings Are Known , 1969 .

[9]  D. Appleyard Styles and Methods of Structuring a City , 1970 .

[10]  R. Hart,et al.  The Development of Spatial Cognition: A Review. , 1973 .

[11]  R. Downs,et al.  Image and Environment: Cognitive Mapping and Spatial Behavior , 2017 .

[12]  A. Siegel,et al.  The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. , 1975, Advances in child development and behavior.

[13]  G. Stratton University of California publications in psychology , 1976 .

[14]  L. Nadel,et al.  The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map , 1978 .

[15]  G. Allen,et al.  Developmental issues in cognitive mapping: the selection and utilization of environmental landmarks. , 1979, Child development.

[16]  L. Anooshian,et al.  Developmental Changes in Cognitive Maps of a Familiar Neighborhood. , 1981 .

[17]  E. Batschelet Circular statistics in biology , 1981 .

[18]  R. Morris,et al.  Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions , 1982, Nature.

[19]  Irwin N. Jankovic,et al.  Principles of spatial problem solving. , 1982 .

[20]  Horst Mittelstaedt,et al.  Homing by Path Integration , 1982 .

[21]  J. L. Gould,et al.  The Insect Mind: Physics or Metaphysics? , 1982 .

[22]  Donald R. Griffin,et al.  Animal Mind — Human Mind , 1982 .

[23]  Avian navigation : International Symposium on Avian Navigation (ISAN), held at Tirrenia (Pisa), September 11-14, 1981 , 1982 .

[24]  U. Paul Do Geese Use Path Integration for Walking Home , 1982 .

[25]  Barbara Hayes-Roth,et al.  Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  John A. Sloboda,et al.  The Acquisition of Symbolic Skills , 1983 .

[27]  W. Chase Spatial Representations of Taxi Drivers , 1983 .

[28]  J. Jonides,et al.  Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[29]  N. Newcombe,et al.  Turn Left at the Church, Or Three Miles North , 1986 .

[30]  J. L. Gould The Locale Map of Honey Bees: Do Insects Have Cognitive Maps? , 1986, Science.

[31]  C. Thinus-Blanc The Cognitive Map Concept and its Consequences , 1987 .

[32]  R. Sutherland,et al.  Some limitations on the use of distal cues in place navigation by rats , 1987, Psychobiology.

[33]  Patrick Péruch,et al.  Spatio-temporal aspects of the mental representation of urban space , 1988 .

[34]  R Wehner,et al.  Path integration in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  T. Gärling,et al.  Distance cognition by taxi drivers and the general public , 1989 .

[36]  D. Holding,et al.  Acquisition of Route Network Knowledge by Males and Females , 1989 .

[37]  Patrick Suppes,et al.  Foundations of Measurement, Vol. II: Geometrical, Threshold, and Probabilistic Representations , 1989 .

[38]  Lynn Nadel,et al.  Varieties of Spatial Cognition , 1990 .

[39]  R. Menzel,et al.  Do insects have cognitive maps? , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[40]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Acquisition of route and survey knowledge in the absence of vision. , 1990, Journal of motor behavior.

[41]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Dominance of Celestial Cues over Landmarks Disproves Map-Like Orientation in Honey Bees , 1990 .

[42]  C. Gallistel The organization of learning , 1990 .

[43]  Stefan Glasauer,et al.  Idiothetic navigation in Gerbils and Humans , 1991 .

[44]  F. Dyer Bees acquire route-based memories but not cognitive maps in a familiar landscape , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[45]  F. Ciancia Tolman and Honzik (1930) revisited or the mazes of psychology (1930-1980) , 1991 .

[46]  C. Holding Clusters and reference points in cognitive representations of the environment , 1992 .

[47]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Distortions in cognitive maps , 1992 .

[48]  G. Allen,et al.  Age-related differences in adults' macrospatial cognitive processes. , 1992, Experimental aging research.

[49]  D. Kimura Sex differences in the brain. , 1992, Scientific American.

[50]  B. Poucet Spatial cognitive maps in animals: new hypotheses on their structure and neural mechanisms. , 1993, Psychological review.

[51]  F. Dyer,et al.  Honey bee spatial memory: use of route-based memories after displacement , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[52]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: assessment of path integration ability. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[53]  D. Kimura,et al.  Sex differences in route-learning , 1993 .

[54]  Roland Maurer,et al.  What is modelling for? a critical review of the models of path integration , 1995 .

[55]  A. Devlin,et al.  Interactive wayfinding: Use of cues by men and women , 1995 .

[56]  James T. Todd,et al.  Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. , 1995 .

[57]  A Berthoz,et al.  Spatial memory of body linear displacement: what is being stored? , 1995, Science.

[58]  C. Lawton,et al.  Individual- and Gender-Related Differences in Indoor Wayfinding , 1996 .

[59]  A. Bennett,et al.  Do animals have cognitive maps? , 1996, The Journal of experimental biology.

[60]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Pictorial surface attitude and local depth comparisons , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[61]  P Péruch,et al.  Homing in Virtual Environments: Effects of Field of View and Path Layout , 1997, Perception.

[62]  A. Devlin,et al.  Interactive way-finding : Map style and effectiveness , 1997 .

[63]  Zhang,et al.  Visually mediated odometry in honeybees , 1997, The Journal of experimental biology.

[64]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Recalling Routes around London: Activation of the Right Hippocampus in Taxi Drivers , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[65]  Ken Cheng,et al.  Use of Landmark Configuration in Pigeons and Humans: II. Generality Across Search Tasks , 1997 .

[66]  Jean-Arcady Meyer,et al.  BIOLOGICALLY BASED ARTIFICIAL NAVIGATION SYSTEMS: REVIEW AND PROSPECTS , 1997, Progress in Neurobiology.

[67]  S. Huettel,et al.  Males and females use different distal cues in a virtual environment navigation task. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[68]  Roy A. Ruddle,et al.  Navigating Large-Scale Desk-Top Virtual Buildings: Effects of Orientation Aids and Familiarity , 1998, Presence.

[69]  Sarah S. Chance,et al.  Spatial Updating of Self-Position and Orientation During Real, Imagined, and Virtual Locomotion , 1998 .

[70]  S. Moffat,et al.  Navigation in a “Virtual” Maze: Sex Differences and Correlation With Psychometric Measures of Spatial Ability in Humans , 1998 .

[71]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Knowing where and getting there: a human navigation network. , 1998, Science.

[72]  J. Todd,et al.  The perception of surface curvature from optical motion , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[73]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Sex, Lies And Virtual Reality , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[74]  Hanspeter A. Mallot,et al.  Navigation and Acquisition of Spatial Knowledge in a Virtual Maze , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[75]  P E Patterson,et al.  Gender differences in navigating virtual worlds. , 1999, Biomedical sciences instrumentation.

[76]  Joseph R. Madsen,et al.  Human theta oscillations exhibit task dependence during virtual maze navigation , 1999, Nature.

[77]  T. Collett,et al.  Calibration of vector navigation in desert ants , 1999, Current Biology.

[78]  Roy A. Ruddle,et al.  Navigating Large-Scale Virtual Environments: What Differences Occur Between Helmet-Mounted and Desk-Top Displays? , 1999, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[79]  D. Kimura Sex and cognition , 1999 .

[80]  K. Jeffery,et al.  The Hippocampal and Parietal Foundations of Spatial Cognition , 1999 .

[81]  A. Wunderlich,et al.  Brain activation during human navigation: gender-different neural networks as substrate of performance , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[82]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  The Spatial Semantic Hierarchy , 2000, Artif. Intell..

[83]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Place learning in humans: The role of distance and direction information , 2001, Spatial Cogn. Comput..

[84]  Thomas S. Collett,et al.  How do insects use path integration for their navigation? , 2000, Biological Cybernetics.

[85]  A. Devlin Mind and Maze: Spatial Cognition and Environmental Behavior , 2001 .

[86]  Timothy P. McNamara,et al.  Systems of Spatial Reference in Human Memory , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[87]  Lorin J. Elias,et al.  Are sex differences in navigation caused by sexually dimorphic strategies or by differences in the ability to use the strategies , 2002 .

[88]  R. Sutherland,et al.  Human place learning in a virtual Morris water task: some important constraints on the flexibility of place navigation , 2002, Behavioural Brain Research.

[89]  William H Warren,et al.  Path Integration from Optic Flow and Body Senses in a Homing Task , 2002, Perception.

[90]  E. Spelke,et al.  Human Spatial Representation: Insights from Animals , 2002 .

[91]  M. Tarr,et al.  Virtual reality in behavioral neuroscience and beyond , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[92]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Visual Homing Is Possible Without Landmarks: A Path Integration Study in Virtual Reality , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[93]  J. Todd,et al.  Perceptual representation of visible surfaces , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[94]  Arne D. Ekstrom,et al.  Cellular networks underlying human spatial navigation , 2003, Nature.

[95]  T. McNamara,et al.  Egocentric and geocentric frames of reference in memory of large-scale space , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[96]  B. Kuipers,et al.  The Skeleton In The Cognitive Map , 2003 .

[97]  T. McNamara,et al.  Cognitive maps and the hippocampus , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[98]  C. Gutwin,et al.  Female advantage for spatial location memory in both static and dynamic environments , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[99]  A. Devlin Giving Directions: Gender and Perceived Quality , 2003 .

[100]  D. Saucier,et al.  Males and females scan maps similarly, but give directions differently , 2003, Brain and Cognition.

[101]  E. Maguire,et al.  The Well-Worn Route and the Path Less Traveled Distinct Neural Bases of Route Following and Wayfinding in Humans , 2003, Neuron.

[102]  Sibylle D. Steck,et al.  Inertial cues do not enhance knowledge of environmental layout , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[103]  M. Tarr,et al.  Rotation direction affects object recognition , 2004, Vision Research.

[104]  G. Allen,et al.  Aging and path integration skill: Kinesthetic and vestibular contributions to wayfinding , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[105]  J. Loomis,et al.  Body-based senses enhance knowledge of directions in large-scale environments , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[106]  T. S. Collett,et al.  Landmark learning in bees , 1983, Journal of comparative physiology.

[107]  C. Nievergelt,et al.  Bees navigate by using vectors and routes rather than maps , 1990, Naturwissenschaften.

[108]  Andrew P. Duchon,et al.  Humans do not switch between path knowledge and landmarks when learning a new environment , 2007, Psychological research.