Quantum verification of NP problems with single photons and linear optics

Quantum computing is seeking to realize hardware-optimized algorithms for application-related computational tasks. NP (nondeterministic-polynomial-time) is a complexity class containing many important but intractable problems like the satisfiability of potentially conflict constraints (SAT). According to the well-founded exponential time hypothesis, verifying an SAT instance of size n requires generally the complete solution in an O ( n )-bit proof. In contrast, quantum verification algorithms, which encode the solution into quantum bits rather than classical bit strings, can perform the verification task with quadratically reduced information about the solution in $$\tilde O(\sqrt n )$$ O ̃ ( n ) qubits. Here we realize the quantum verification machine of SAT with single photons and linear optics. By using tunable optical setups, we efficiently verify satisfiable and unsatisfiable SAT instances and achieve a clear completeness-soundness gap even in the presence of experimental imperfections. The protocol requires only unentangled photons, linear operations on multiple modes and at most two-photon joint measurements. These features make the protocol suitable for photonic realization and scalable to large problem sizes with the advances in high-dimensional quantum information manipulation and large scale linear-optical systems. Our results open an essentially new route toward quantum advantages and extend the computational capability of optical quantum computing.

[1]  John Watrous,et al.  Succinct quantum proofs for properties of finite groups , 2000, Proceedings 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.

[2]  J. O'Brien,et al.  Witnessing eigenstates for quantum simulation of Hamiltonian spectra , 2016, Science Advances.

[3]  Fabio Sciarrino,et al.  Integrated photonic quantum technologies , 2019, Nature Photonics.

[4]  Mikhail N. Vyalyi,et al.  Classical and Quantum Computation , 2002, Graduate studies in mathematics.

[5]  Elham Kashefi,et al.  Demonstration of Blind Quantum Computing , 2011, Science.

[6]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  Photonic quantum simulators , 2012, Nature Physics.

[7]  Jing Chen,et al.  Short Multi-Prover Quantum Proofs for SAT without Entangled Measurements , 2010, 1011.0716.

[8]  Christian Schneider,et al.  High-efficiency multiphoton boson sampling , 2017, Nature Photonics.

[9]  Aram W. Harrow,et al.  Quantum computational supremacy , 2017, Nature.

[10]  Michael A. Forbes,et al.  Improved Soundness for QMA with Multiple Provers , 2011, Electron. Colloquium Comput. Complex..

[11]  Andrew G. White,et al.  Photonic Boson Sampling in a Tunable Circuit , 2012, Science.

[12]  Stephen A. Cook,et al.  The complexity of theorem-proving procedures , 1971, STOC.

[13]  Humphreys,et al.  An Optimal Design for Universal Multiport Interferometers , 2016, 1603.08788.

[14]  E. Kashefi,et al.  Experimental verification of quantum computation , 2013, Nature Physics.

[15]  Philip Walther,et al.  Experimental boson sampling , 2012, Nature Photonics.

[16]  J. Rarity,et al.  Photonic quantum technologies , 2009, 1003.3928.

[17]  Travis S. Humble,et al.  Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor , 2019, Nature.

[18]  Guangwen Yang,et al.  Quantum computational advantage using photons , 2020, Science.

[19]  J. O'Brien,et al.  Universal linear optics , 2015, Science.

[20]  Rahul Jain,et al.  QIP = PSPACE , 2011, JACM.

[21]  Scott Aaronson,et al.  The computational complexity of linear optics , 2010, STOC '11.

[22]  Niraj Kumar,et al.  Experimental demonstration of quantum advantage for NP verification with limited information , 2020, Nature Communications.

[23]  Bill Fefferman,et al.  The Power of Unentanglement , 2008, 2008 23rd Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity.

[24]  N. Spagnolo,et al.  Photonic quantum information processing: a review , 2018, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[25]  Pedro Chamorro-Posada,et al.  swap test and Hong-Ou-Mandel effect are equivalent , 2013, 1303.6814.

[26]  Nicolò Spagnolo,et al.  Experimental validation of photonic boson sampling , 2014, Nature Photonics.

[27]  Matthias Christandl,et al.  Quantum computational complexity of the N-representability problem: QMA complete. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[28]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor , 2013, Nature Communications.

[29]  Umesh V. Vazirani,et al.  Classical command of quantum systems , 2013, Nature.

[30]  Reck,et al.  Experimental realization of any discrete unitary operator. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[31]  Dmitri Maslov,et al.  Quantum advantage for computations with limited space , 2020, Nature Physics.

[32]  Hong,et al.  Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[33]  Jian-Wei Pan,et al.  18-Qubit Entanglement with Six Photons' Three Degrees of Freedom. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[34]  Alain Tapp,et al.  All Languages in NP Have Very Short Quantum Proofs , 2007, 2009 Third International Conference on Quantum, Nano and Micro Technologies.

[35]  Juan Miguel Arrazola,et al.  Quantum superiority for verifying NP-complete problems with linear optics , 2017, npj Quantum Information.

[36]  A. Schreiber,et al.  A 2D Quantum Walk Simulation of Two-Particle Dynamics , 2012, Science.

[37]  Russell Impagliazzo,et al.  On the Complexity of k-SAT , 2001, J. Comput. Syst. Sci..

[38]  Giovanni Di Giuseppe,et al.  Single-photon three-qubit quantum logic using spatial light modulators , 2017, Nature Communications.

[39]  Peter W. Shor,et al.  Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer , 1995, SIAM Rev..

[40]  John Preskill,et al.  Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond , 2018, Quantum.

[41]  Quantum de Finetti Theorems Under Local Measurements with Applications , 2017 .

[42]  Jun Gao,et al.  Experimental quantum fast hitting on hexagonal graphs , 2018, Nature Photonics.

[43]  M. Christandl,et al.  N-representability is QMA-complete , 2006 .

[44]  B. J. Metcalf,et al.  Boson Sampling on a Photonic Chip , 2012, Science.

[45]  Sharad Malik,et al.  Boolean satisfiability from theoretical hardness to practical success , 2009, Commun. ACM.

[46]  Experimental demonstration of quantum advantage for NP verification with limited information. , 2021, Nature communications.

[47]  I. V. Kondratyev,et al.  Robust Architecture for Programmable Universal Unitaries. , 2019, Physical review letters.

[48]  A. Crespi,et al.  Integrated multimode interferometers with arbitrary designs for photonic boson sampling , 2013, Nature Photonics.

[49]  Lov K. Grover A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search , 1996, STOC '96.

[50]  Keiji Matsumoto,et al.  Quantum Merlin-Arthur Proof Systems: Are Multiple Merlins More Helpful to Arthur? , 2009, Chic. J. Theor. Comput. Sci..

[51]  R. Prevedel,et al.  Quantum computing on encrypted data , 2013, Nature Communications.

[52]  Ashley Montanaro,et al.  Testing Product States, Quantum Merlin-Arthur Games and Tensor Optimization , 2010, JACM.