The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6

Abstract. Projections of future climate change play a fundamental role in improving understanding of the climate system as well as characterizing societal risks and response options. The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) is the primary activity within Phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) that will provide multi-model climate projections based on alternative scenarios of future emissions and land use changes produced with integrated assessment models. In this paper, we describe ScenarioMIP's objectives, experimental design, and its relation to other activities within CMIP6. The ScenarioMIP design is one component of a larger scenario process that aims to facilitate a wide range of integrated studies across the climate science, integrated assessment modeling, and impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability communities, and will form an important part of the evidence base in the forthcoming Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessments. At the same time, it will provide the basis for investigating a number of targeted science and policy questions that are especially relevant to scenario-based analysis, including the role of specific forcings such as land use and aerosols, the effect of a peak and decline in forcing, the consequences of scenarios that limit warming to below 2 °C, the relative contributions to uncertainty from scenarios, climate models, and internal variability, and long-term climate system outcomes beyond the 21st century. To serve this wide range of scientific communities and address these questions, a design has been identified consisting of eight alternative 21st century scenarios plus one large initial condition ensemble and a set of long-term extensions, divided into two tiers defined by relative priority. Some of these scenarios will also provide a basis for variants planned to be run in other CMIP6-Endorsed MIPs to investigate questions related to specific forcings. Harmonized, spatially explicit emissions and land use scenarios generated with integrated assessment models will be provided to participating climate modeling groups by late 2016, with the climate model simulations run within the 2017–2018 time frame, and output from the climate model projections made available and analyses performed over the 2018–2020 period.

[1]  Wolfgang Lutz,et al.  The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: Population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100 , 2017, Global environmental change : human and policy dimensions.

[2]  B. O’Neill,et al.  Global urbanization projections for the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways , 2017 .

[3]  Jean Chateau,et al.  Long-term economic growth projections in the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways , 2017 .

[4]  K. Riahi,et al.  The roads ahead: Narratives for shared socioeconomic pathways describing world futures in the 21st century , 2017 .

[5]  M. Strubegger,et al.  Shared Socio-Economic Pathways of the Energy Sector – Quantifying the Narratives , 2017 .

[6]  J. Eom,et al.  The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview , 2017 .

[7]  P. Kyle,et al.  Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways , 2017 .

[8]  Eric Larour,et al.  Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project (ISMIP6) contribution to CMIP6. , 2016, Geoscientific model development.

[9]  Reto Knutti,et al.  The Detection and Attribution Model Intercomparison Project (DAMIP v1.0)contribution to CMIP6 , 2016 .

[10]  Robert Pincus,et al.  The Radiative Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (RFMIP): Experimental Protocol for CMIP6 , 2016 .

[11]  George C. Hurtt,et al.  The Land Use Model Intercomparison Project (LUMIP) contribution to CMIP6:rationale and experimental design , 2016 .

[12]  Pierre Friedlingstein,et al.  C4MIP – The Coupled Climate–Carbon Cycle Model Intercomparison Project: Experimental protocol for CMIP6 , 2016 .

[13]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Historical greenhouse gas concentrations , 2016 .

[14]  J. Lamarque,et al.  AerChemMIP: quantifying the effects of chemistry and aerosols in CMIP6 , 2016 .

[15]  Paul Charbonneau,et al.  Solar Forcing for CMIP6 (v3.1) , 2016 .

[16]  The Decadal Climate Prediction Project , 2016 .

[17]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  The Vulnerability, Impacts, Adaptation, and Climate Services (VIACS) Advisory Board for CMIP6 , 2016 .

[18]  B. Stevens,et al.  The Radiative Forcing Model Intercomparison Project (RFMIP): Experimental Protocol for CMIP6 (in open review: 10.5194/gmd-2016-88) , 2016 .

[19]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Constraining Future Summer Austral Jet Stream Positions in the CMIP5 Ensemble by Process-Oriented Multiple Diagnostic Regression* , 2016 .

[20]  Veronika Eyring,et al.  Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization , 2015 .

[21]  L. Feyen,et al.  Ensemble flood risk assessment in Europe under high end climate scenarios , 2015 .

[22]  Shingo Watanabe,et al.  The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (GeoMIP6): simulation design and preliminary results , 2015 .

[23]  S. Klein,et al.  Emergent Constraints for Cloud Feedbacks , 2015, Current Climate Change Reports.

[24]  Benjamin M. Sanderson,et al.  Recent Progress in Constraining Climate Sensitivity With Model Ensembles , 2015, Current Climate Change Reports.

[25]  Ying Liu,et al.  21st century United States emissions mitigation could increase water stress more than the climate change it is mitigating , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Brian C. O'Neill,et al.  Sensitivity of regional climate to global temperature and forcing , 2015 .

[27]  G. Luderer,et al.  Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C , 2015 .

[28]  Reto Knutti,et al.  Improved pattern scaling approaches for the use in climate impact studies , 2015 .

[29]  Qiuhong Tang,et al.  New climate and socio-economic scenarios for assessing global human health challenges due to heat risk , 2015, Climatic Change.

[30]  C. Flachsland Mitigation of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2015 .

[31]  Kenichi Wada,et al.  Technological Forecasting & Social Change Locked into Copenhagen pledges — Implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals , 2014 .

[32]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Developing Climate Model Comparisons , 2014 .

[33]  P. Cox,et al.  Emergent constraints on climate‐carbon cycle feedbacks in the CMIP5 Earth system models , 2014 .

[34]  R. Moss,et al.  Climate model intercomparisons: Preparing for the next phase , 2014 .

[35]  John P. Weyant,et al.  The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies , 2014, Climatic Change.

[36]  Claudia Tebaldi,et al.  Pattern scaling: Its strengths and limitations, and an update on the latest model simulations , 2014, Climatic Change.

[37]  S. Bony,et al.  Spread in model climate sensitivity traced to atmospheric convective mixing , 2014, Nature.

[38]  L. Clarke,et al.  Assessing Transformation Pathways , 2014 .

[39]  D. Shindell,et al.  Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing , 2014 .

[40]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared climate policy assumptions , 2014, Climatic Change.

[41]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  A new scenario framework for Climate Change Research: scenario matrix architecture , 2014, Climatic Change.

[42]  R. Knutti,et al.  Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections , 2013 .

[43]  P. Cox,et al.  Sensitivity of tropical carbon to climate change constrained by carbon dioxide variability , 2013, Nature.

[44]  N. Arnell,et al.  The global-scale impacts of climate change on water resources and flooding under new climate and socio-economic scenarios , 2013, Climatic Change.

[45]  Keywan Riahi,et al.  A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways , 2013, Climatic Change.

[46]  M. Holland,et al.  Constraining projections of summer Arctic sea ice , 2012 .

[47]  K. Trenberth,et al.  A Less Cloudy Future: The Role of Subtropical Subsidence in Climate Sensitivity , 2012, Science.

[48]  Brian C. O'Neill,et al.  The Need for and Use of Socio-Economic Scenarios for Climate Change Analysis , 2012 .

[49]  Karl E. Taylor,et al.  An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design , 2012 .

[50]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  A proposal for a new scenario framework to support research and assessment in different climate research communities , 2012 .

[51]  D. Stephenson,et al.  On the Robustness of Emergent Constraints Used in Multimodel Climate Change Projections of Arctic Warming , 2012 .

[52]  R. Knutti,et al.  September Arctic sea ice predicted to disappear near 2°C global warming above present , 2011 .

[53]  K. Calvin,et al.  The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300 , 2011 .

[54]  John P. Weyant,et al.  A special issue on the RCPs , 2011 .

[55]  A. Thomson,et al.  The representative concentration pathways: an overview , 2011 .

[56]  Tom M. L. Wigley,et al.  Emulating atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 – Part 2: Applications , 2011 .

[57]  T. Wigley,et al.  Emulating coupled atmosphere-ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 - Part 1: Model description and calibration , 2011 .

[58]  J. Fasullo,et al.  Constraints on Climate Sensitivity from Radiation Patterns in Climate Models , 2011 .

[59]  J. Rogelj,et al.  Which emission pathways are consistent with a 2° C or 1.5° C temperature limit? , 2010 .

[60]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment , 2010, Nature.

[61]  L. Clarke,et al.  International climate policy architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios , 2009 .

[62]  A. Hall,et al.  September sea-ice cover in the Arctic Ocean projected to vanish by 2100 , 2009 .

[63]  Jean-Pascal van Ypersele de Strihou,et al.  Towards New Scenarios for Analysis of Emissions, Climate Change, Impacts, and Response Strategies , 2008 .

[64]  R. Knutti,et al.  Constraints on the transient climate response from observed global temperature and ocean heat uptake , 2008 .

[65]  John F. B. Mitchell,et al.  THE WCRP CMIP3 Multimodel Dataset: A New Era in Climate Change Research , 2007 .

[66]  S. Solomon The Physical Science Basis : Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[67]  B. Metz,et al.  Climate change 2007 : mitigation of climate change :contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth assessmentreport of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[68]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. , 2007 .

[69]  G. Meehl,et al.  Constraining Climate Sensitivity from the Seasonal Cycle in Surface Temperature , 2006 .

[70]  A. Hall,et al.  Using the current seasonal cycle to constrain snow albedo feedback in future climate change , 2006 .

[71]  M. Allen,et al.  Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle , 2002, Nature.

[72]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Special report on emissions scenarios : a special report of Working group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2000 .