Perceptions of the Impact of High-Level-Machine-Intelligence from University Students in Taiwan: The Case for Human Professions, Autonomous Vehicles, and Smart Homes

There is a “timing optimism” that artificial general intelligence will be achieved soon, but some literature has suggested that people have mixed feelings about its overall impact. This study expanded their findings by investigating how Taiwanese university students perceived the overall impact of high-level-machine-intelligence (HLMI) in three areas: a set of 12 human professions, autonomous vehicles, and smart homes. Respondents showed a relatively more positive attitude, with a median answer of “on balance good”, toward HLMI’s development corresponding to those occupations having a higher probability of automation and computerization, and a less positive attitude, with a median of “more or less neutral”, toward professions involving human judgment and social intelligence, and especially creativity, which had a median of “on balance bad”. On the other hand, they presented a highly positive attitude toward the AI application of the smart home, while they demonstrated relatively more reservation toward autonomous vehicles. Gender, area of study, and a computer science background were found as predictors in many cases, whereas traffic benefits, and safety and regulation concerns, among others, were found as the most significant predictors for the overall impact of autonomous vehicles, with comfort and support benefits being the most significant predictor for smart homes. Recommendations for educators, policy makers, and future research were provided.

[1]  Patricia Baudier,et al.  Smart home: Highly-educated students' acceptance , 2020, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[2]  Alan Bundy,et al.  Preparing for the future of Artificial Intelligence , 2016, AI & SOCIETY.

[3]  R. Penrose,et al.  How Long Until Human-Level AI ? Results from an Expert Assessment , 2011 .

[4]  John Salvatier,et al.  When Will AI Exceed Human Performance? Evidence from AI Experts , 2017, ArXiv.

[5]  Vasile Gherheș,et al.  Technical and Humanities Students’ Perspectives on the Development and Sustainability of Artificial Intelligence (AI) , 2018, Sustainability.

[6]  L. Whitmarsh,et al.  Social barriers to the adoption of smart homes , 2013 .

[7]  Csaba Csiszár,et al.  Operational Model and Impacts of Mobility Service Based on Autonomous Vehicles , 2018 .

[8]  Charlie Wilson,et al.  Benefits and risks of smart home technologies , 2017 .

[9]  Bryan Reimer,et al.  Autonomous Vehicles and Alternatives to Driving: Trust, Preferences, and Effects of Age , 2017 .

[10]  Jianhua Ma,et al.  Top Challenges for Smart Worlds: A Report on the Top10Cs Forum , 2015, IEEE Access.

[11]  Robert D. Atkinson AI Superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the New World Order , 2018 .

[12]  M. Arntz,et al.  OECD Social , Employment and Migration Working Papers No . 189 The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS , 2016 .

[13]  M. Arntz,et al.  The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis , 2016 .

[14]  Michael A. Osborne,et al.  The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? , 2017 .

[15]  Will Hurd,et al.  Rise of the Machines: Artificial Intelligence and Its Growing Impact on U.S. Policy , 2018 .

[16]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  Assessing Public Opinions of and Interest in New Vehicle Technologies: An Austin Perspective , 2016 .

[17]  Savvas Papagiannidis,et al.  A systematic review of the smart home literature: A user perspective , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[18]  Qianli Xu,et al.  Needs and attitudes of Singaporeans towards home service robots: a multi-generational perspective , 2014, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[19]  Zenobia Talati,et al.  The health benefits of autonomous vehicles: public awareness and receptivity in Australia , 2018, Australian and New Zealand journal of public health.

[20]  Dávid Földes,et al.  User expectations towards mobility services based on autonomous vehicle , 2018 .

[21]  Nick Bostrom,et al.  Future Progress in Artificial Intelligence: A Survey of Expert Opinion , 2013, PT-AI.

[22]  Riender Happee,et al.  Public opinion on automated driving: results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents , 2015 .

[23]  M. Lytras,et al.  Clustering Smart City Services: Perceptions, Expectations, Responses , 2019, Sustainability.