Feedback strategies for shared control in dexterous telemanipulation

Shared control represents a middle ground between supervisory control and traditional bilateral control in which the remote system can exert control over some aspects of the task while the human operator maintains access to low-level forces and motions. Our telemanipulation system includes tactile, force and motion sensors that allow the slave to regulate grasp forces and impart rolling motions to a grasped object. We describe a set of experiments designed to determine whether shared control can improve the ability of an operator to handle objects delicately and to determine what combinations of force, visual and audio feedback provide the best level of performance and operator sense of presence. The results demonstrate the benefits of shared control and the need to choose carefully the types and methods of direct and indirect feedback.

[1]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory , 1985 .

[2]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  Calibration and Mapping of a Human Hand for Dexterous Telemanipulation , 2000, Dynamic Systems and Control: Volume 2.

[3]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  A unified approach for motion and force control of robot manipulators: The operational space formulation , 1987, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[4]  Diane K. Michelson,et al.  Applied Statistics for Engineers and Scientists , 2001, Technometrics.

[5]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.

[6]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  Development and Testing of a Telemanipulation System with Arm and Hand Motion , 2000 .

[7]  Karsten P. Ulland,et al.  Vii. References , 2022 .

[8]  Stanley A. Schneider,et al.  Object impedance control for cooperative manipulation: theory and experimental results , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Fredrik Rehnmark,et al.  Robonaut: NASA's Space Humanoid , 2000, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[10]  Samad Hayati,et al.  Design and implementation of a robot control system with traded and shared control capability , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  R. Johansson,et al.  Factors influencing the force control during precision grip , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Performance evaluation of a six-axis generalized force-reflecting teleoperator , 1991, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[13]  Peter K. Allen,et al.  Shared autonomy in a robot hand teleoperation system , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'94).

[14]  Noriyasu Inaba,et al.  Onboard local compensation on ETS-W space robot teleoperation , 1999, 1999 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (Cat. No.99TH8399).

[15]  Paul G. Backes Multi-sensor based impedance control for task execution , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[16]  Tsuneo Yoshikawa,et al.  Manipulating and grasping forces in manipulation by multifingered robot hands , 1987, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[17]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  A phase management framework for event-driven dextrous manipulation , 1998, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..