Differences in Regional Brain Activities during Memory Acquisition Depending on Individual Working Memory Capacity

Individual capacity of recall memory varies greatly even among healthy young adults. Nevertheless, the difference in brain circuitry underlying varied memory capacity has yet to be fully investigated. We acquired electroencephalographic measurements from 43 healthy young adults while performing a demanding working memory task and studied the changes in regional cortical activity in relation to different levels of memory performance. The memory task involved sequentially presenting seven arrow pictures to a participant during the encoding period, who was then asked to recall the direction of one of the arrows in the sequence within the retrieval period. We divided the participants into three groups of high, intermediate, and low performance based on the weighted hierarchical grouping method. Regional brain activities were source-localized using multiple sparse priors method in the highand low-performance groups, and group differences were determined by non-parametric permutation tests. Our ndings showed that participants with higher memory performance exhibited wider distribution of cortical activity including the prefrontal and parieto-posterior cortices, whereas lower performance participants only exhibited stable activations across occipital regions. The results implied the importance of selective attention in order to attain optimal individual working memory performance. Furthermore, we suggest the potential role of the angular gyrus as an interplay between the prefrontal and posterior regions for the management of stimulus ow and signal control. Future works should focus on conducting more thorough connectivity analysis to investigate the relationship of cortical activations with individual working memory performance.

[1]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[2]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Is the rostro-caudal axis of the frontal lobe hierarchical? , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  E. Vogel,et al.  Interactions between attention and working memory , 2006, Neuroscience.

[4]  Koichi Yokosawa,et al.  Alpha-band Amplitude During Memory Encoding Is an Index of Memory Performance , 2016 .

[5]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding reveals the contents of visual working memory in early visual areas , 2009, Nature.

[6]  Adam C. Riggall,et al.  Distributed Patterns of Activity in Sensory Cortex Reflect the Precision of Multiple Items Maintained in Visual Short-Term Memory , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[8]  Andrew N. Meltzoff,et al.  The Role of Visual Association Cortex in Associative Memory Formation across Development , 2018, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Dezhong Yao,et al.  The Competitive Influences of Perceptual Load and Working Memory Guidance on Selective Attention , 2015, PloS one.

[10]  Theodore P. Zanto,et al.  Causal role of the prefrontal cortex in top-down modulation of visual processing and working memory , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Early Top–Down Control of Visual Processing Predicts Working Memory Performance , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Markus Siegel,et al.  Cortical information flow during flexible sensorimotor decisions , 2015, Science.

[13]  Robert R. Sokal,et al.  A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships , 1958 .

[14]  M. Seghier The Angular Gyrus , 2013, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[15]  A. Lansner,et al.  Neurocognitive Architecture of Working Memory , 2015, Neuron.

[16]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Goal-directed attention alters the tuning of object-based representations in extrastriate cortex , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[17]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[18]  E. Vogel,et al.  Visual working memory capacity: from psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Neural Evidence for Representation-Specific Response Selection , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Jesper Tegnér,et al.  Mechanism for top-down control of working memory capacity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem , 2008, NeuroImage.

[22]  Edward F. Ester,et al.  Parietal and Frontal Cortex Encode Stimulus-Specific Mnemonic Representations during Visual Working Memory , 2015, Neuron.

[23]  John T. Serences,et al.  Reconstructions of Information in Visual Spatial Working Memory Degrade with Memory Load , 2014, Current Biology.

[24]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Distributed and Dynamic Storage of Working Memory Stimulus Information in Extrastriate Cortex , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.