Addressing Challenges in the Application of Animal Movement Ecology to Aquatic Conservation and Management

The dynamic nature of most environments forces many animals to move to meet their fundamental needs. This is especially true in aquatic environments where shifts in spatial ecology (which are a result of movements) are among the first adaptive responses of animals to changes in ecosystems. Changes in the movement and distribution of individuals will in turn alter population dynamics and ecosystem structure. Thus, understanding the drivers and impacts of variation in animal movements over time is critical to conservation and spatial planning. Here we identify key challenges that impede aquatic animal movement science from informing management and conservation, and propose strategies for overcoming them. Challenges include: 1) Insufficient communication between terrestrial and aquatic movement scientists that could be increased through cross-pollination of analytical tools and development of new tools and outputs; 2) Incomplete coverage in many studies of animal space use (e.g. entire life span not considered); 3) Insufficient data archiving and availability; 4) Barriers to incorporating movement data into decision-making processes; and 5) Limited understanding of the value of movement data for management and conservation. We argue that the field of movement ecology is at present an under-tapped resource for aquatic decision-makers, but is poised to play a critical role in future management approaches and policy development.

[1]  Mike van den Tillaart,et al.  Field-testing a new miniaturized GPS-Argos satellite transmitter (3.5 g) on migratory shorebirds , 2016 .

[2]  Eliezer Gurarie,et al.  A novel method for identifying behavioural changes in animal movement data. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[3]  D. Brockington,et al.  Nature Unbound: Conservation, Capitalism and the Future of Protected Areas , 2008 .

[4]  Heather A. Piwowar,et al.  Sharing Detailed Research Data Is Associated with Increased Citation Rate , 2007, PloS one.

[5]  P. Nelson,et al.  Residence time and habitat use of coho salmon in Humboldt Bay, California: an acoustic telemetry study , 2012, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[6]  K. M. Schaefer,et al.  Tracking apex marine predator movements in a dynamic ocean , 2011, Nature.

[7]  V. Nguyen,et al.  Mobilizing New Science into Management Practice: The Challenge of Biotelemetry for Fisheries Management, a Case Study of Canada's Fraser River , 2013 .

[8]  Christopher M Holbrook,et al.  Acoustic telemetry and fisheries management. , 2017, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[9]  R. Maloney,et al.  Financial Costs of Meeting Global Biodiversity Conservation Targets: Current Spending and Unmet Needs , 2012, Science.

[10]  William Bialek,et al.  Mapping the stereotyped behaviour of freely moving fruit flies , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[11]  Scott A. Shaffer,et al.  Perspectives in Ornithology: Application of tracking and data-logging technology in research and conservation of seabirds , 2009 .

[12]  E. Revilla,et al.  A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Nathan Young,et al.  How do potential knowledge users evaluate new claims about a contested resource? Problems of power and politics in knowledge exchange and mobilization. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[14]  Navinder J. Singh,et al.  Linking Movement Ecology with Wildlife Management and Conservation , 2016, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[15]  Christian Rutz,et al.  New frontiers in biologging science , 2009, Biology Letters.

[16]  Glen Gawarkiewicz,et al.  Population connectivity in marine systems : an overview , 2007 .

[17]  J. Browder,et al.  Modeling Larval Transport and Settlement of Pink Shrimp in South Florida: Dynamics of Behavior and Tides , 2015 .

[18]  J. Kocik,et al.  Aquatic animal telemetry: A panoramic window into the underwater world , 2015, Science.

[19]  Daniel P. Costa,et al.  New Insights into Pelagic Migrations: Implications for Ecology and Conservation , 2012 .

[20]  Alistair J. Hobday,et al.  Dynamic Ocean Management: Identifying the Critical Ingredients of Dynamic Approaches to Ocean Resource Management , 2015 .

[21]  J. Meeuwig,et al.  Freshwater Protected Areas: Strategies for Conservation , 2002, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[22]  Daniel Fortin,et al.  Logging‐induced changes in habitat network connectivity shape behavioral interactions in the wolf–caribou–moose system , 2014 .

[23]  Mark A. Lewis,et al.  State-space models’ dirty little secrets: even simple linear Gaussian models can have estimation problems , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[24]  Sam Yeaman,et al.  Mandated data archiving greatly improves access to research data , 2013, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[25]  M. Lennox Monies for marine conservation : a white paper examining new funding sources for oceans and coasts , 2012 .

[26]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Prioritizing global conservation efforts , 2006, Nature.

[27]  D. Veríssimo,et al.  Flagships or Battleships: Deconstructing the Relationship between Social Conflict and Conservation Flagship Species , 2013 .

[28]  E. Shepard,et al.  Moving in a moving medium: new perspectives on flight , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  M. Power,et al.  Personality-dependent spatial ecology occurs independently from dispersal in wild burbot (Lota lota) , 2015 .

[30]  D. Costa,et al.  Mobile receivers: releasing the mooring to ‘see’ where fish go , 2013, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[31]  D. Secor Specifying divergent migrations in the concept of stock: the contingent hypothesis , 1999 .

[32]  Ethan P. White,et al.  Nine simple ways to make it easier to (re)use your data , 2013 .

[33]  Daniel Fortin,et al.  Moving to stay in place: behavioral mechanisms for coexistence of African large carnivores. , 2013, Ecology.

[34]  M. Myjak,et al.  A small long-life acoustic transmitter for studying the behavior of aquatic animals. , 2016, The Review of scientific instruments.

[35]  Michael E. Byrne,et al.  Using first-passage time to link behaviour and habitat in foraging paths of a terrestrial predator, the racoon , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[36]  Thomas M. Grothues,et al.  Evaluating discard mortality of summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus) in the commercial trawl fishery: Developing acoustic telemetry techniques , 2012 .

[37]  Paul T. Groth,et al.  Ten Simple Rules for the Care and Feeding of Scientific Data , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[38]  Torkild Tveraa,et al.  USING FIRST‐PASSAGE TIME IN THE ANALYSIS OF AREA‐RESTRICTED SEARCH AND HABITAT SELECTION , 2003 .

[39]  Helen Bailey,et al.  Ontogeny in marine tagging and tracking science: technologies and data gaps , 2012 .

[40]  Jennifer Lynn Thornhill Bridging the Gap between Research and Decision-Making: Empirical Evidence from a Case Study of Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) Management in the U.S , 2014 .

[41]  E. Revilla,et al.  Trends and missing parts in the study of movement ecology , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  M. Whitlock Data archiving in ecology and evolution: best practices. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[43]  K. McMahon,et al.  A review of ecogeochemistry approaches to estimating movements of marine animals , 2013 .

[44]  Luc Lens,et al.  Mind the gaps when using science to address conservation concerns , 2013, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[45]  Hugh Drummond,et al.  Archiving Primary Data: Solutions for Long-Term Studies. , 2015, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[46]  J. Watson,et al.  The performance and potential of protected areas , 2014, Nature.

[47]  R. Suryan,et al.  Translocation and hand‐rearing result in short‐tailed albatrosses returning to breed in the Ogasawara Islands 80 years after extirpation , 2017 .

[48]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Integrating research using animal‐borne telemetry with the needs of conservation management , 2017 .

[49]  Jason W. Horn,et al.  Aeroecology: probing and modeling the aerosphere. , 2007, Integrative and comparative biology.

[50]  Steven J. Cooke,et al.  To share or not to share in the emerging era of big data: perspectives from fish telemetry researchers on data sharing , 2017 .

[51]  C. Layman,et al.  Size, sex and individual-level behaviour drive intrapopulation variation in cross-ecosystem foraging of a top-predator. , 2015, The Journal of animal ecology.

[52]  H. Sigurdsson,et al.  Exploring Submarine Arc Volcanoes , 2007 .

[53]  Robert Lanfear,et al.  Public Data Archiving in Ecology and Evolution: How Well Are We Doing? , 2015, PLoS biology.

[54]  W. Porter,et al.  First satellite tracks of neonate sea turtles redefine the ‘lost years’ oceanic niche , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  Steven J. Cooke,et al.  A moving target—incorporating knowledge of the spatial ecology of fish into the assessment and management of freshwater fish populations , 2016, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[56]  Steven J. Cooke,et al.  Ocean Tracking Network Canada: A Network Approach to Addressing Critical Issues in Fisheries and Resource Management with Implications for Ocean Governance , 2011 .

[57]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Applying global criteria to tracking data to define important areas for marine conservation , 2016 .

[58]  J. Navarro,et al.  Foraging movements of Audouin's gull (Larus audouinii) in the Ebro Delta, NW Mediterranean: A preliminary satellite-tracking study , 2012 .

[59]  A. Pullin,et al.  Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making? , 2004 .

[60]  J. Robinson Conservation Biology and Real‐World Conservation , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[61]  J. Wu,et al.  The optimal allocation of conservation funds , 1999 .

[62]  G. Uetz,et al.  The effect of prey movement on attack behavior and patch residence decision rules of wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) , 1997, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[63]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Achieving Conservation Science that Bridges the Knowledge–Action Boundary , 2013, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[64]  H. Possingham,et al.  Commentary: Linking Movement Ecology with Wildlife Management and Conservation , 2016, Front. Ecol. Evol..

[65]  R. Suryan,et al.  Translocation and hand-rearing of the short-tailed albatross Phoebastria albatrus: early indicators of success for species conservation and island restoration , 2013, Oryx.

[66]  S. Andelman,et al.  COMPARING MARINE AND TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DESIGN OF COASTAL MARINE RESERVES , 2003 .

[67]  Max Henrion,et al.  Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[68]  C. Tenopir,et al.  Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions , 2011, PloS one.

[69]  R. V. Hoek,et al.  The Knowing‐Doing Gap: How Smart Companies Turn Knowledge into Action , 2000 .

[70]  Sex- and habitat-specific movement of an omnivorous semi-terrestrial crab controls habitat connectivity and subsidies: a multi-parameter approach , 2015, Oecologia.

[71]  Claire Thomas,et al.  Biodiversity. Biodiversity databases spread, prompting unification call. , 2009, Science.

[72]  N. Kohler,et al.  Stock Structure of the Blue Shark (Prionace Glauca) in the North Atlantic Ocean Based on Tagging Data , 2009 .

[73]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Funding nature conservation: who pays? , 2012 .

[74]  Leigh G Torres,et al.  Classification of Animal Movement Behavior through Residence in Space and Time , 2017, PloS one.

[75]  Dustin R Rubenstein,et al.  From birds to butterflies: animal movement patterns and stable isotopes. , 2004, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[76]  T. Wiegand,et al.  Individual-based movement models reveals sex-biased effects of landscape fragmentation on animal movement , 2012 .

[77]  P. Hulme EDITORIAL: Bridging the knowing–doing gap: know‐who, know‐what, know‐why, know‐how and know‐when , 2014 .

[78]  H. Possingham,et al.  Biodiversity gains from efficient use of private sponsorship for flagship species conservation , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.