Biodiversity Through Sexual Selection

What engenders biodiversity? Natural selection certainly adapts species to their ecological niches, but does it really create all of the new niches and new species to ll them? Consider: the most successful, complex, and numerous species on earth are composed of sexually-reproducing animals and owering plants. Both groups typically undergo a form of sexual selection through mate choice: animals are selected by conspeci cs and owering plants are selected by heterospeci c pollinators. This common feature suggests that the evolution of biodiversity may be driven not simply by natural-selective adaptation to ecological niches, but by subtle interactions between natural selection and sexual selection. This paper presents theoretical arguments and simulation results in support of our view that sexual selection creates new tness peaks (and thus new niches), helps species escape from old local optima to nd new, better peaks, and promotes speciation to increase the number of lineages searching for peaks. Natural selection is a precondition for biodiversity (because it permits ecological adaptation), but sexual selection may often be a more direct cause of species diversity for animals and owering plants. The paper concludes with implications for evolutionary engineering, human evolution, and conservation priorities.

[1]  A. Zahavi Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. , 1975, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  Robert M. May,et al.  How Many Species Inhabit the Earth , 1992 .

[3]  Frederick S. Szalay,et al.  Evolution of permanent estrus displays in hominids , 1991 .

[4]  M. Watve The Red Queen: Sex and the evolution of human nature , 1998 .

[5]  Edward O. Wilson,et al.  The Current State of Biological Diversity , 1988 .

[6]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning , 1988 .

[7]  C. LLOYD MORGAN,et al.  Natural Selection and Elimination , 1888, Nature.

[8]  Michael Taylor Diversity of life , 1994, Nature.

[9]  F. Eeckman,et al.  Evolution and Biocomputation: Computational Models of Evolution , 1995 .

[10]  J. Huxley Evolution: The Modern Synthesis , 1943 .

[11]  ダーウィン チャールス,et al.  The descent of man and selection in relation to sex , 1907 .

[12]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  The Role of Mate Choice in Biocomputation: Sexual Selection as a Process of Search, Optimization and Diversification , 1995, Evolution and Biocomputation.

[13]  S. Gould,et al.  Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism , 1972 .

[14]  J. Baldwin A New Factor in Evolution , 1896, The American Naturalist.

[15]  H. Cronin,et al.  The ant and the peacock : altruism and sexual selection from Darwin to today , 1991 .

[16]  Donald A. Dewsbury,et al.  Effects of novelty of copulatory behavior: The Coolidge effect and related phenomena. , 1981 .

[17]  A. Hallam,et al.  How many species? , 1977, Nature.

[18]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[19]  F J Ayala,et al.  Tempo and mode in evolution. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  M. Wilson The ant and the peacock: altruism and sexual selection from darwin to today , 1992 .

[21]  Roger Catchpole,et al.  Quantitative Genetic Studies of Behavioral Evolution , 1995 .

[22]  James D. Murray,et al.  Genetic and ecological diversity: The sport of nature , 1991 .

[23]  L Partridge,et al.  Genetic and non-genetic approaches to questions about sexual selection , 1994 .

[24]  Manfred Milinski,et al.  Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice , 1994 .

[25]  M. Ryan,et al.  Directional Patterns of Female Mate Choice and the Role of Sensory Biases , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[26]  Geoffrey F. Miller,et al.  A Review of Sexual Selection and Human Evolution: How Mate Choice shaped Human Nature , 1998 .

[27]  M. Kirkpatrick SEXUAL SELECTION AND THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE CHOICE , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[28]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Parental Guidance Suggested: How Parental Imprinting Evolves Through Sexual Selection as an Adaptive Learning Mechanism , 1993, Adapt. Behav..

[29]  William G. Eberhard,et al.  Sexual Selection And Animal Genitalia , 1985 .

[30]  W. Eberhard,et al.  COPULATORY COURTSHIP AND CRYPTIC FEMALE CHOICE IN INSECTS , 1991 .

[31]  D. Futuyma,et al.  Reflections on reflections: Ecology and evolutionary biology , 1986, Journal of the history of biology.

[32]  Sewall Wright,et al.  CHARACTER CHANGE, SPECIATION, AND THE HIGHER TAXA , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[33]  P. Todd Sexual selection and the evolution of learning , 1996 .

[34]  R. Lande,et al.  SEXUAL DIMORPHISM, SEXUAL SELECTION, AND ADAPTATION IN POLYGENIC CHARACTERS , 1980, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  M. Ryan Sexual selection, sensory systems and sensory exploitation. , 1990 .

[36]  P. Pye-Smith The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex , 1871, Nature.

[37]  T. Dobzhansky Genetics and the Origin of Species , 1937 .

[38]  M. Ryan,et al.  Neuroanatomy influences speciation rates among anurans. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  Evolutionary wanderlust: sexual selection with directional mate preferences , 1993 .

[40]  Inman Harvey,et al.  Issues in evolutionary robotics , 1993 .

[41]  Peter M. Todd,et al.  On the Sympatric Origin of Species: Mercurial Mating in the Quicksilver Model , 1991, ICGA.

[42]  T. Guilford,et al.  Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  John Maynard Smith,et al.  When learning guides evolution , 1987, Nature.

[44]  R. Punnett,et al.  The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.

[45]  A. Rowell,et al.  Models in Paleobiology , 1973 .

[46]  B. Clarke The evidence for apostatic selection , 1969, Heredity.

[47]  W. Eberhard,et al.  SPECIES ISOLATION, GENITAL MECHANICS, AND THE EVOLUTION OF SPECIES‐SPECIFIC GENITALIA IN THREE SPECIES OF MACRODACTYLUS BEETLES (COLEOPTERA, SCARABEIDAE, MELOLONTHINAE) , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[48]  N. Pierce Origin of Species , 1914, Nature.