Selective entorhinal and nonselective cortical-hippocampal region lesions, but not selective hippocampal lesions, disrupt learned irrelevance in rabbit eyeblink conditioning

Prior experiments, as well as computational models, have implicated the hippocampal region in mediating the influence of nonreinforced stimulus preexposure on subsequent learning. Learned irrelevance (LIRR) is a preexposure task in which uncorrelated preexposures to the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the unconditioned stimulus (US) produce a retardation of subsequent CS-US conditioning. In the work presented here, we report the results of tests of LIRR in eyeblink conditioning in rabbits with sham lesions, nonselective cortical-hippocampal region lesions, selective hippocampal lesions, and selective entorhinal lesions. Sham-lesioned rabbits that had been preexposed to the CS and the US exhibited slower acquisition of conditioned responses, as compared with context-preexposed controls. Nonselective cortical-hippocampal region lesions disrupted LIRR, whereas selective hippocampal lesions had no detrimental effect on LIRR. Selective entorhinal lesions disrupted LIRR. These findings fit other recent empirical findings and theoretical predictions that some classical conditioning tasks previously thought to depend on the hippocampus depend, rather, on the entorhinal cortex.

[1]  H. T. Blair,et al.  Stimulus configuration, spatial learning, and hippocampal function , 1993, Behavioural Brain Research.

[2]  C. Buhusi,et al.  Stimulus configuration, occasion setting, and the hippocampus. , 1997, Behavioral neuroscience.

[3]  R. Lubow.  Latent inhibition. , 1973, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  M. Gluck,et al.  Hippocampal mediation of stimulus representation: A computational theory , 1993, Hippocampus.

[5]  L. Jarrard.  5 - Use of Ibotenic Acid to Selectively Lesion Brain Structures , 1991 .

[6]  P. Solomon,et al.  Latent inhibition and stimulus generalization of the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) following dorsal hippocampal ablation. , 1975, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[7]  L. Jarrard.  On the role of the hippocampus in learning and memory in the rat. , 1993, Behavioral and neural biology.

[8]  R. Lubow.  Latent Inhibition and Conditioned Attention Theory , 1989 .

[9]  W. B. Orr,et al.  Hippocampectomy selectively disrupts discrimination reversal conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response , 1983, Behavioural Brain Research.

[10]  Joseph E. Steinmetz,et al.  A general-purpose computer system for behavioral conditioning and neural recording experiments , 1998 .

[11]  Involvement of entorhinal cortex or parietal cortex in long-term spatial discrimination memory in rats: retrograde amnesia. , 1996, Behavioral neuroscience.

[12]  Tim Otto,et al.  Combined Lesions of Perirhinal and Entorhinal Cortex Impair Rats’ Performance in Two Versions of the Spatially Guided Radial-Arm Maze , 1997, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[13]  Geoffrey Hall,et al.  Learned Irrelevance: No More Than the Sum of CS and US Preexposure Effects? , 1996 .

[14]  L. Jarrard.  Selective hippocampal lesions and behavior , 1980 .

[15]  A. G. Baker.  Learned Irrelevance and Learned Helplessness: Rats Learn that Stimuli, Reinforcers, and Responses are Uncorrelated. , 1976 .

[16]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Learned Irrelevance is not the Sum of Exposure to CS and US , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[17]  M. Gallagher,et al.  Hippocampal lesions disrupt decrements but not increments in conditioned stimulus processing , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[18]  L. Jarrard.  On the use of ibotenic acid to lesion selectively different components of the hippocampal formation , 1989, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[19]  JOHN W. Moore,et al.  The hippocampus and the classically conditioned nictitating membrane response: A real-time attentional-associative model , 1988, Psychobiology.

[20]  N. Schmajuk,et al.  A neural network approach to hippocampal function in classical conditioning. , 1991, Behavioral neuroscience.

[21]  I. Weiner,et al.  The switching model of latent inhibition: an update of neural substrates , 1997, Behavioural Brain Research.

[22]  J. Rawlins,et al.  A comparison between the effects of medial septal lesions and entorhinal cortex lesions on performance of nonspatial working memory tasks and reversal learning , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[23]  R. C. Honey,et al.  Selective hippocampal lesions abolish the contextual specificity of latent inhibition and conditioning. , 1993, Behavioral neuroscience.

[24]  A. G. Baker,et al.  Preexposure to the CS alone, US alone, or CS and US uncorrelated: Latent inhibition, blocking by context or learned irrelevance? , 1979 .

[25]  D. Amaral,et al.  Lesions of the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices in the monkey produce long-lasting memory impairment in the visual and tactual modalities , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[26]  M. M. Glasier,et al.  Effects of Unilateral Entorhinal Cortex Lesion on Retention of Water Maze Performance , 1999, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[27]  Stephen Maren,et al.  Muscimol Inactivation of the Dorsal Hippocampus Impairs Contextual Retrieval of Fear Memory , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  L. Jarrard,et al.  Selective excitotoxic pathology in the rat hippocampus , 1993, Neuropathology and applied neurobiology.

[29]  N. Schmajuk,et al.  Latent inhibition: a neural network approach. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[30]  H. Eichenbaum,et al.  Two functional components of the hippocampal memory system , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[31]  J. Pearce,et al.  Hippocampal Lesions Attenuate Latent Inhibition and the Decline of the Orienting Response in Rats , 1987, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.

[32]  J. Gray,et al.  Psychoarithmetic or pick your own? , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[33]  M. Gluck,et al.  Dissociating entorhinal and hippocampal involvement in latent inhibition. , 2000, Behavioral neuroscience.

[34]  John F. Disterhoft,et al.  A system for quantitative analysis of associative learning. Part 1. Hardware interfaces with cross-species applications , 1994, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[35]  M. Gluck,et al.  Dissociation of hippocampal and entorhinal function in associative learning: A computational approach , 1995, Psychobiology.

[36]  C. Buhusi,et al.  Perplexing effects of hippocampal lesions on latent inhibition: a neural network solution. , 1998, Behavioral neuroscience.

[37]  N. Schmajuk,et al.  Latent inhibition of the rat eyeblink response: Effect of hippocampal aspiration lesions , 1994, Physiology & Behavior.

[38]  Ralph R. Miller,et al.  Learned irrelevance exceeds the sum of CS-preexposure and US-preexposure deficits. , 1988 .

[39]  M. Gluck,et al.  Dissociating entorhinal and hippocampal involvement in latent inhibition , 2000 .

[40]  H Eichenbaum,et al.  Critical role of the parahippocampal region for paired-associate learning in rats. , 1993, Behavioral neuroscience.

[41]  L. Jarrard,et al.  Acquisition of concurrent conditional discriminations in rats with ibotenate lesions of hippocampus and of subiculum , 1990, Psychobiology.

[42]  R. Lubow,et al.  Latent inhibition: The effects of ITI and CS intensity during preexposure☆ , 1976 .

[43]  Geoffrey Hall.  Perceptual and associative learning , 1991 .

[44]  Catherine E. Myers,et al.  Dissociating basal forebrain and medial temporal amnesic syndromes: Insights from classical conditioning , 2002, Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society.

[45]  M. Gluck,et al.  A computational perspective on dissociating hippocampal and entorhinal function , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.