Social interaction shapes babbling: Testing parallels between birdsong and speech

Birdsong is considered a model of human speech development at behavioral and neural levels. Few direct tests of the proposed analogs exist, however. Here we test a mechanism of phonological development in human infants that is based on social shaping, a selective learning process first documented in songbirds. By manipulating mothers' reactions to their 8-month-old infants' vocalizations, we demonstrate that phonological features of babbling are sensitive to nonimitative social stimulation. Contingent, but not noncontingent, maternal behavior facilitates more complex and mature vocal behavior. Changes in vocalizations persist after the manipulation. The data show that human infants use social feedback, facilitating immediate transitions in vocal behavior. Social interaction creates rapid shifts to developmentally more advanced sounds. These transitions mirror the normal development of speech, supporting the predictions of the avian social shaping model. These data provide strong support for a parallel in function between vocal precursors of songbirds and infants. Because imitation is usually considered the mechanism for vocal learning in both taxa, the findings introduce social shaping as a general process underlying the development of speech and song.

[1]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  J. L. Gewirtz,et al.  Social conditioning of vocalizations in the infant. , 1959, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[3]  P. Weisberg.  Social and nonsocial conditioning of infant vocalizations. , 1963, Child development.

[4]  Donald K. Routh,et al.  Conditioning of vocal response differentiation in infants. , 1969 .

[5]  P. Marler.  Birdsong and speech development: could there be parallels? , 1970, American scientist.

[6]  Fernando Nottebohm,et al.  The Origins of Vocal Learning , 1972, The American Naturalist.

[7]  Richard F. Thompson,et al.  Advances in Psychobiology , 1972 .

[8]  D. Klisz,et al.  Synchronous reinforcement of vocal responses in failure-to-thrive infants. , 1972, Child development.

[9]  R. Jakobson.  Child Language, Aphasia and Phonological Universals , 1980 .

[10]  Child development and behavior. , 1980, American journal of public health.

[11]  P. Marler,et al.  Developmental overproduction and selective attrition: new processes in the epigenesis of birdsong. , 1982, Developmental psychobiology.

[12]  A. King,et al.  Epigenesis of cowbird song—A joint endeavour of males and females , 1983, Nature.

[13]  E. Gibson,et al.  The development of perception , 1983 .

[14]  K. Bloom,et al.  Turn taking affects the quality of infant vocalizations , 1987, Journal of Child Language.

[15]  Andrew P. King,et al.  Searching for the functional origins of song in eastern brown-headed cowbirds, Molothrus ater ater , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[16]  A. King,et al.  Female visual displays affect the development of male song in the cowbird , 1988, Nature.

[17]  A. Meltzoff,et al.  Imitation in Newborn Infants: Exploring the Range of Gestures Imitated and the Underlying Mechanisms. , 1989, Developmental psychology.

[18]  Andrew P. King,et al.  Mozart's Starling , 1990 .

[19]  D. Cicchetti,et al.  The self in transition: Infancy to childhood. , 1990 .

[20]  A. King,et al.  Communicating about communicating: when innate is not enough. , 1990, Developmental psychobiology.

[21]  Giacomo Mauro DAriano.  Advances in child development and behavior. , 1991, Advances in child development and behavior.

[22]  P. Marler,et al.  Action-Based Learning: a New Form of Developmental Plasticity in Bird Song , 1992 .

[23]  P. Giovacchini,et al.  The Self in Transition: Infancy to Childhood , 1992 .

[24]  Kathleen Bloom,et al.  Adults' attributions of intentionality to vocalizing infants , 1993 .

[25]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Understanding other minds : perspectives from autism , 1994 .

[26]  P. Marler,et al.  Selection-based learning in bird song development. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  R N Aslin,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996, Science.

[28]  S. S. Jones,et al.  Imitation or exploration? Young infants' matching of adults' oral gestures. , 1996, Child development.

[29]  Andrew P. King,et al.  A Brain of Her Own: A Neural Correlate of Song Assessment in a Female Songbird , 1997, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[30]  D. Sengelaub,et al.  Visual and song nuclei correlate with courtship skills in brown-headed cowbirds , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[31]  F. Nottebohm,et al.  For Whom The Bird Sings Context-Dependent Gene Expression , 1998, Neuron.

[32]  M. Goldstein,et al.  Consistent responses of human mothers to prelinguistic infants: the effect of prelinguistic repertoire size. , 1999, Journal of comparative psychology.

[33]  L. Petitto,et al.  Biological Foundations of Language , 1967, Neurology.

[34]  Andrew P. King,et al.  A role of her own: female cowbirds, Molothrus ater, influence the development and outcome of song learning , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  D. Oller.  The emergence of the speech capacity , 2000 .

[36]  Kathryn Hirsh-Pasek,et al.  Becoming a Word Learner , 2000 .

[37]  D. Wilkin,et al.  Neuron , 2001, Brain Research.

[38]  G. Turkewitz,et al.  No Compelling Evidence That Newborns Imitate Oral Gestures. , 2001, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[39]  Alan Fogel,et al.  Infant Vocal Development in a Dynamic Mother-Infant Communication System. , 2001, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[40]  Jodie A. Baird,et al.  Infants parse dynamic action. , 2001, Child development.

[41]  D. Sengelaub,et al.  Cultures, genes, and neurons in the development of song and singing in brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) , 2002, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.